The MRI
2025–26 · Final

Wofford

SoCon · 19–13

Power-2.6#206 of 365
Résumé-1.41#509 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winEast Tennessee State (72–69)
Worst lossThe Citadel (90–93)
Schedule faced-6.5 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 at George Mason L 46–70 -12.3 -11.7
1 vs Milwaukee W 86–76 +5.6 +4.4
2 at Auburn L 62–93 -23.8 -7.2
2 at Bellarmine W 94–86 +4.1 +3.9
3 vs North Florida W 86–78 +13.5 -5.5
3 vs Erskine non-D1 W 81–57 +38.0 -14.0
4 at Northern Kentucky L 83–93 -5.2 -4.8
4 at Eastern Kentucky W 83–77 +2.3 +3.7
5 vs Presbyterian W 63–56 +6.4 +0.6
5 vs Elon L 52–73 +4.8 -25.8
7 at Gardner-Webb W 83–57 +15.8 +10.2
7 at Wichita State L 73–84 -13.9 +2.9
8 vs Union (KY) non-D1 W 88–54 +38.0 -4.0
9 at Western Carolina W 79–74 -0.4 +5.4
9 at The Citadel W 95–86 +10.4 -1.4
10 vs UNC Greensboro W 97–85 +7.6 +4.4
10 at Mercer L 97–109 -6.0 -6.0
11 vs Chattanooga L 67–76 +4.9 -13.9
11 at Furman W 74–70 -6.9 +10.9
12 vs Samford W 88–78 -0.7 +10.7
12 vs Mercer W 80–77 -0.6 +3.6
13 at Chattanooga W 81–55 -0.6 +26.6
14 vs East Tennessee State L 72–86 -3.2 -10.8
14 at VMI W 81–67 +12.6 +1.4
14 vs Western Carolina W 77–66 +5.1 +5.9
15 at Samford L 80–97 -6.1 -10.9
15 at UNC Greensboro L 89–99 +2.2 -12.2
16 vs VMI W 82–76 +18.1 -12.1
16 vs Furman L 67–76 -1.5 -7.5
17 at East Tennessee State W 72–69 -8.7 +11.7
17 vs The Citadel L 90–93 +15.9 -18.9
18 N UNC Greensboro L 72–75 +4.9 -7.9

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #17 in 2018–19. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 300 2004–05: #198 of 326 (14-14)2005–06: #231 of 326 (11-18)2006–07: #288 of 326 (10-20)2007–08: #206 of 328 (16-16)2008–09: #179 of 330 (16-14)2009–10: #61 of 335 (26-9)2010–11: #76 of 346 (21-13)2011–12: #147 of 345 (19-13)2012–13: #241 of 347 (12-19)2013–14: #125 of 351 (20-13)2014–15: #54 of 351 (28-7)2015–16: #189 of 351 (15-17)2016–17: #177 of 351 (16-17)2017–18: #148 of 351 (21-13)2018–19: #17 of 353 (27-5)2019–20: #171 of 353 (17-16)2020–21: #102 of 347 (15-9)2021–22: #93 of 358 (19-13)2022–23: #172 of 363 (17-16)2023–24: #187 of 362 (17-15)2024–25: #124 of 364 (19-16)2025–26: #206 of 365 (19-13) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 300 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 206 of 365 19–13 -2.59 Power
2024–25 124 of 364 19–16 3.18 Power
2023–24 187 of 362 17–15 -1.80 Power
2022–23 172 of 363 17–16 -0.14 Power
2021–22 93 of 358 19–13 6.18 Power
2020–21 102 of 347 15–9 5.86 Power
2019–20 171 of 353 17–16 34.46 MRI
2018–19 17 of 353 27–5 150.40 MRI
2017–18 148 of 351 21–13 49.31 MRI
2016–17 177 of 351 16–17 36.97 MRI
2015–16 189 of 351 15–17 26.95 MRI
2014–15 54 of 351 28–7 95.92 MRI
2013–14 125 of 351 20–13 55.17 MRI
2012–13 241 of 347 12–19 -2.21 MRI
2011–12 147 of 345 19–13 47.23 MRI
2010–11 76 of 346 21–13 81.42 MRI
2009–10 61 of 335 26–9 100.31 MRI
2008–09 179 of 330 16–14 29.96 MRI
2007–08 206 of 328 16–16 15.05 MRI
2006–07 288 of 326 10–20 -30.11 MRI
2005–06 231 of 326 11–18 2.10 MRI
2004–05 198 of 326 14–14 19.47 MRI