The MRI
2026–27 · Week 3

Howard

MEAC · 2–2

Power-2.1#172 of 365
Résumé-0.48#307 · wins above average
Movement-16down from #156 last week
Best winStetson (75–62)
Worst lossPennsylvania (65–78)
Schedule faced-7.1 avg opponent
Schedule ahead+2.3 avg opponent
Returning production63% of last season's win shares · #15 of 364
Incoming production1.1 win shares from other schools' players

How this rating is built

Power = w × (average margin counted + average opponent rating) + (1 − w) × preseason prior, where w = games ÷ (games + 8). After 4 games, w is 33%, so the preseason prior is 67% of this rating — mostly preseason, for now. Every game played shrinks that share.

PartValueWeightAdds
Margin counted+4.5 avg× 33%+1.5
Opponents faced-7.1 avg× 33%-2.4
Preseason prior-1.9× 67%-1.2
Power-2.1

This explains how the model reached the number. The opponent ratings come out of the same fitted model, so it is not independent proof that the rating is right.

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the result against expectation. Adds is a different question: how many points of Power the game contributes, counting its margin and the strength of the opponent together. A game can beat expectation and still add little, or the reverse. Adds, plus the preseason prior, sum to Power (figures are rounded so the column adds up). Hover an Adds figure for its arithmetic.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerfAdds
2 at Yale L 62–72 -8.4 -1.6 -0.3
2 at Alcorn State W 94–83 +15.9 -4.9 +0.3
3 at Pennsylvania L 65–78 -5.6 -7.4 -0.9
3 vs Stetson W 75–62 +12.0 +1.0 +0.0
Preseason prior (67% of the rating)-1.2
Power-2.1

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
3 at Davidson -10.7 16%
4 N Duquesne +0.8 53%
5 at Charleston -9.4 20%

Season by season

Best finish: #196 in 2025–26. 22 seasons rated. The two columns' numbers are not comparable; the rank within each is. Season links open that year's game log.

25 1 400 2004–05 (MRI Classic): #319 of 326 (5-23)2005–06 (MRI Classic): #301 of 326 (7-22)2006–07 (MRI Classic): #316 of 326 (9-22)2007–08 (MRI Classic): #326 of 328 (6-25)2008–09 (MRI Classic): #321 of 330 (8-23)2009–10 (MRI Classic): #330 of 335 (7-25)2010–11 (MRI Classic): #334 of 346 (6-24)2011–12 (MRI Classic): #306 of 345 (10-21)2012–13 (MRI Classic): #316 of 347 (6-23)2013–14 (MRI Classic): #347 of 351 (8-25)2014–15 (MRI Classic): #243 of 351 (16-16)2015–16 (MRI Classic): #304 of 351 (12-20)2016–17 (MRI Classic): #335 of 351 (10-24)2017–18 (MRI Classic): #332 of 351 (10-23)2018–19 (MRI Classic): #281 of 353 (14-17)2019–20 (MRI Classic): #350 of 353 (3-28)2020–21 (MRI 2.0): #344 of 347 (1-4)2021–22 (MRI 2.0): #249 of 358 (16-13)2022–23 (MRI 2.0): #219 of 363 (22-13)2023–24 (MRI 2.0): #264 of 362 (18-17)2024–25 (MRI 2.0): #317 of 364 (12-20)2025–26 (MRI 2.0): #196 of 365 (24-11) MRI 2.0Classic 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 400 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Two lines where both ratings cover a season - MRI 2.0 in red, Classic in grey. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRec MRI 2.0MRI Classic
2025–26 24–11 #196 of 365 · -2.26 –
2024–25 12–20 #317 of 364 · -11.06 –
2023–24 18–17 #264 of 362 · -6.08 –
2022–23 22–13 #219 of 363 · -3.33 –
2021–22 16–13 #249 of 358 · -5.81 –
2020–21 1–4 #344 of 347 · -19.91 –
2019–20 3–28 – #350 of 353 · -126.02
2018–19 14–17 – #281 of 353 · -20.16
2017–18 10–23 – #332 of 351 · -58.96
2016–17 10–24 – #335 of 351 · -62.31
2015–16 12–20 – #304 of 351 · -30.96
2014–15 16–16 – #243 of 351 · 5.38
2013–14 8–25 – #347 of 351 · -76.50
2012–13 6–23 – #316 of 347 · -49.56
2011–12 10–21 – #306 of 345 · -34.76
2010–11 6–24 – #334 of 346 · -68.24
2009–10 7–25 – #330 of 335 · -78.77
2008–09 8–23 – #321 of 330 · -70.11
2007–08 6–25 – #326 of 328 · -87.89
2006–07 9–22 – #316 of 326 · -54.27
2005–06 7–22 – #301 of 326 · -39.06
2004–05 5–23 – #319 of 326 · -76.40