The MRI
2025–26 · Final

Indiana

Big Ten · 18–14

Power+14.2#42 of 365
Résumé+8.42#63 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winPurdue (72–67)
Worst lossMinnesota (64–73)
Schedule faced+10.0 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 vs Alabama A&M W 98–51 +29.7 +17.3
1 N Marquette W 100–77 +5.4 +17.6
2 vs Milwaukee W 101–70 +22.4 +8.6
2 vs Incarnate Word W 69–61 +24.5 -16.5
3 vs Lindenwood W 73–53 +23.2 -3.2
4 vs Kansas State W 86–69 +12.0 +5.0
4 vs Bethune-Cookman W 100–56 +23.6 +20.4
5 at Minnesota L 64–73 +4.4 -13.4
5 N Louisville L 78–87 -5.7 -3.3
6 vs Penn State W 113–72 +14.4 +26.6
6 at Kentucky L 60–72 -6.6 -5.4
7 vs Chicago State W 78–58 +34.5 -14.5
8 vs Siena W 81–60 +17.8 +3.2
10 vs Washington W 90–80 +6.1 +3.9
10 at Maryland W 84–66 +6.2 +11.8
10 vs Nebraska L 77–83 -4.0 -2.0
11 at Michigan State L 60–81 -12.8 -8.2
11 vs Iowa L 57–74 -0.8 -16.2
12 at Michigan L 72–86 -21.1 +7.1
12 at Rutgers W 82–59 +8.8 +14.2
13 vs Purdue W 72–67 -8.6 +13.6
13 at UCLA W 98–97 -5.5 +6.5
14 at USC L 75–81 +2.8 -8.8
14 vs Wisconsin W 78–77 -2.5 +3.5
15 vs Oregon W 92–74 +9.8 +8.2
15 at Illinois L 51–71 -15.1 -4.9
16 at Purdue L 64–93 -14.1 -14.9
17 vs Northwestern L 68–72 +6.6 -10.6
17 vs Michigan State L 64–77 -7.4 -5.6
18 vs Minnesota W 77–47 +9.9 +20.1
18 at Ohio State L 78–91 -6.1 -6.9
19 N Northwestern L 61–74 +3.9 -16.9

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #3 in 2012–13. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 300 2004–05: #121 of 326 (15-14)2005–06: #73 of 326 (19-12)2006–07: #37 of 326 (21-11)2007–08: #22 of 328 (25-8)2008–09: #290 of 330 (6-25)2009–10: #259 of 335 (10-21)2010–11: #128 of 346 (12-20)2011–12: #14 of 345 (27-9)2012–13: #3 of 347 (27-6)2013–14: #65 of 351 (17-15)2014–15: #58 of 351 (20-14)2015–16: #11 of 351 (27-8)2016–17: #56 of 351 (18-15)2017–18: #112 of 351 (16-15)2018–19: #95 of 353 (19-16)2019–20: #55 of 353 (20-12)2020–21: #82 of 347 (12-15)2021–22: #47 of 358 (21-14)2022–23: #27 of 363 (23-12)2023–24: #85 of 362 (19-14)2024–25: #55 of 364 (19-13)2025–26: #42 of 365 (18-14) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 300 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 42 of 365 18–14 14.24 Power
2024–25 55 of 364 19–13 11.59 Power
2023–24 85 of 362 19–14 6.91 Power
2022–23 27 of 363 23–12 13.58 Power
2021–22 47 of 358 21–14 10.97 Power
2020–21 82 of 347 12–15 7.34 Power
2019–20 55 of 353 20–12 88.96 MRI
2018–19 95 of 353 19–16 66.56 MRI
2017–18 112 of 351 16–15 64.57 MRI
2016–17 56 of 351 18–15 97.03 MRI
2015–16 11 of 351 27–8 176.68 MRI
2014–15 58 of 351 20–14 93.77 MRI
2013–14 65 of 351 17–15 89.24 MRI
2012–13 3 of 347 27–6 201.81 MRI
2011–12 14 of 345 27–9 153.43 MRI
2010–11 128 of 346 12–20 54.03 MRI
2009–10 259 of 335 10–21 -6.48 MRI
2008–09 290 of 330 6–25 -26.61 MRI
2007–08 22 of 328 25–8 138.43 MRI
2006–07 37 of 326 21–11 121.46 MRI
2005–06 73 of 326 19–12 84.32 MRI
2004–05 121 of 326 15–14 51.05 MRI