The MRI
2025–26 · Final

SE Louisiana

Southland · 9–22

Power-9.6#298 of 365
Résumé-9.26#686 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winNavy (69–65)
Worst lossEast Texas A&M (69–70)
Schedule faced-4.5 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 at Ole Miss L 58–88 -22.0 -8.0
1 at Louisiana L 52–58 -0.3 -5.7
2 at Georgia Tech L 60–70 -11.1 +1.1
2 at Mississippi State L 68–75 -18.4 +11.4
3 vs William Carey non-D1 W 71–45 +31.0 -5.0
4 at UNC Wilmington L 57–70 -17.3 +4.3
4 N Gardner-Webb W 76–68 +11.5 -3.5
4 at Navy W 69–65 -12.8 +16.8
5 vs Northwestern State L 68–76 +3.7 -11.8
6 at Houston Christian W 74–71 -0.0 +3.0
7 vs East Texas A&M L 69–70 +5.7 -6.7
7 at LSU L 65–78 -21.8 +8.8
9 at Incarnate Word L 70–79 -4.8 -4.2
9 vs Stephen F. Austin L 63–73 -11.3 +1.3
10 vs Lamar W 60–52 -1.6 +9.6
10 at McNeese L 61–73 -22.2 +10.2
11 vs New Orleans L 76–79 -0.1 -2.9
11 at Texas A&M-Corpus Christi L 56–68 -10.4 -1.6
12 at UT Rio Grande Valley L 65–68 -12.4 +9.4
12 vs Nicholls W 67–61 -0.1 +6.1
13 vs McNeese L 66–76 -16.8 +6.8
13 at Stephen F. Austin L 58–85 -16.8 -10.2
14 at Lamar L 54–73 -7.1 -11.9
14 vs Houston Christian W 55–47 +5.4 +2.6
15 vs Incarnate Word W 74–62 +0.7 +11.3
15 at Northwestern State L 66–69 -1.7 -1.3
16 at East Texas A&M L 53–70 +0.2 -17.2
16 vs UT Rio Grande Valley L 75–96 -6.9 -14.1
17 vs Texas A&M-Corpus Christi L 68–73 -5.0 -0.0
17 at Nicholls L 60–68 -5.6 -2.4
18 at New Orleans W 82–78 -5.6 +9.6

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #87 in 2004–05. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 400 2004–05: #87 of 326 (23-9)2005–06: #160 of 326 (16-12)2006–07: #224 of 326 (16-14)2007–08: #163 of 328 (17-13)2008–09: #188 of 330 (13-17)2009–10: #177 of 335 (19-12)2010–11: #218 of 346 (15-14)2011–12: #262 of 345 (12-17)2012–13: #274 of 347 (11-18)2013–14: #293 of 351 (12-18)2014–15: #293 of 351 (9-23)2015–16: #305 of 351 (12-21)2016–17: #191 of 351 (16-16)2017–18: #188 of 351 (22-12)2018–19: #202 of 353 (15-16)2019–20: #341 of 353 (5-23)2020–21: #322 of 347 (8-18)2021–22: #271 of 358 (19-15)2022–23: #260 of 363 (18-14)2023–24: #296 of 362 (15-17)2024–25: #220 of 364 (18-14)2025–26: #298 of 365 (9-22) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 400 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 298 of 365 9–22 -9.56 Power
2024–25 220 of 364 18–14 -3.59 Power
2023–24 296 of 362 15–17 -8.14 Power
2022–23 260 of 363 18–14 -5.69 Power
2021–22 271 of 358 19–15 -7.19 Power
2020–21 322 of 347 8–18 -12.50 Power
2019–20 341 of 353 5–23 -71.83 MRI
2018–19 202 of 353 15–16 15.88 MRI
2017–18 188 of 351 22–12 29.84 MRI
2016–17 191 of 351 16–16 31.76 MRI
2015–16 305 of 351 12–21 -31.89 MRI
2014–15 293 of 351 9–23 -20.58 MRI
2013–14 293 of 351 12–18 -22.50 MRI
2012–13 274 of 347 11–18 -21.41 MRI
2011–12 262 of 345 12–17 -7.38 MRI
2010–11 218 of 346 15–14 16.19 MRI
2009–10 177 of 335 19–12 32.27 MRI
2008–09 188 of 330 13–17 25.19 MRI
2007–08 163 of 328 17–13 34.97 MRI
2006–07 224 of 326 16–14 6.34 MRI
2005–06 160 of 326 16–12 34.57 MRI
2004–05 87 of 326 23–9 70.01 MRI