The MRI
2025–26 · Final

Oklahoma State

Big 12 · 20–15

Power+7.8#83 of 365
Résumé+9.55#56 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winBYU (99–92)
Worst lossArizona State (76–85)
Schedule faced+9.3 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 vs Oral Roberts W 95–71 +21.8 +2.2
1 vs Texas A&M W 87–63 -5.0 +29.0
2 vs Prairie View A&M W 94–67 +21.6 +5.4
2 vs Texas A&M-Corpus Christi W 85–69 +12.4 +3.6
3 vs South Florida W 103–95 -2.0 +10.0
3 vs Nicholls W 95–81 +17.2 -3.2
4 at Northwestern W 86–81 -5.3 +10.3
5 vs Sam Houston W 93–83 +6.3 +3.7
5 N Grand Canyon W 84–78 -2.7 +8.7
6 N Oklahoma L 76–85 -6.1 -2.9
7 vs Kansas City W 91–79 +29.4 -17.4
7 vs Cal State Fullerton W 94–89 +15.1 -10.1
9 vs Bethune-Cookman W 103–77 +17.2 +8.8
9 at Texas Tech L 80–102 -16.4 -5.6
10 vs UCF W 87–76 -0.7 +11.7
10 at Iowa State L 71–83 -21.6 +9.6
11 vs Baylor L 79–94 -2.9 -12.1
11 vs Kansas State W 84–83 +5.6 -4.6
12 at TCU L 65–68 -7.8 +4.8
12 vs Iowa State L 71–84 -16.1 +3.1
13 at Utah W 81–69 +2.2 +9.8
14 vs BYU W 99–92 -8.7 +15.7
14 at Arizona L 47–84 -26.3 -10.7
15 at Arizona State L 76–85 -3.3 -5.7
15 vs TCU L 92–95 -2.4 -0.6
16 vs Kansas L 69–81 -9.7 -2.3
16 at Colorado L 69–83 -3.5 -10.5
17 vs West Virginia W 91–84 -1.2 +8.2
17 at Cincinnati L 68–91 -9.3 -13.7
18 at UCF W 111–104 -6.2 +13.2
18 vs Houston L 75–82 -17.6 +10.6
19 N Colorado W 92–83 -0.8 +9.8
19 N TCU L 88–95 -5.1 -1.9
20 vs Davidson W 84–80 +7.5 -3.5
21 vs Wichita State L 70–96 +2.0 -28.0

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #6 in 2004–05. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 200 2004–05: #6 of 326 (25-7)2005–06: #68 of 326 (17-16)2006–07: #79 of 326 (22-13)2007–08: #124 of 328 (17-16)2008–09: #38 of 330 (23-12)2009–10: #50 of 335 (22-11)2010–11: #74 of 346 (20-14)2011–12: #200 of 345 (15-18)2012–13: #30 of 347 (24-8)2013–14: #34 of 351 (21-13)2014–15: #86 of 351 (18-14)2015–16: #171 of 351 (12-20)2016–17: #28 of 351 (20-13)2017–18: #87 of 351 (20-14)2018–19: #168 of 353 (12-20)2019–20: #100 of 353 (18-14)2020–21: #34 of 347 (21-9)2021–22: #39 of 358 (15-15)2022–23: #46 of 363 (20-16)2023–24: #110 of 362 (12-20)2024–25: #108 of 364 (17-18)2025–26: #83 of 365 (20-15) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 200 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 83 of 365 20–15 7.83 Power
2024–25 108 of 364 17–18 4.49 Power
2023–24 110 of 362 12–20 4.83 Power
2022–23 46 of 363 20–16 11.47 Power
2021–22 39 of 358 15–15 11.30 Power
2020–21 34 of 347 21–9 11.58 Power
2019–20 100 of 353 18–14 67.20 MRI
2018–19 168 of 353 12–20 31.69 MRI
2017–18 87 of 351 20–14 80.07 MRI
2016–17 28 of 351 20–13 127.46 MRI
2015–16 171 of 351 12–20 38.73 MRI
2014–15 86 of 351 18–14 78.79 MRI
2013–14 34 of 351 21–13 128.66 MRI
2012–13 30 of 347 24–8 124.23 MRI
2011–12 200 of 345 15–18 19.90 MRI
2010–11 74 of 346 20–14 82.73 MRI
2009–10 50 of 335 22–11 110.42 MRI
2008–09 38 of 330 23–12 113.20 MRI
2007–08 124 of 328 17–16 56.36 MRI
2006–07 79 of 326 22–13 83.20 MRI
2005–06 68 of 326 17–16 86.87 MRI
2004–05 6 of 326 25–7 168.11 MRI