The MRI
2026–27 · Week 3

Northern Arizona

Big Sky · 0–3

Power-11.1#305 of 365
Résumé-0.41#281 · wins above average
Movement+2up from #307 last week
Worst lossUNLV (77–89)
Schedule faced+14.5 avg opponent
Schedule ahead-4.6 avg opponent
Returning production39% of last season's win shares · #69 of 364
Incoming production0.3 win shares from other schools' players

How this rating is built

Power = w × (average margin counted + average opponent rating) + (1 − w) × preseason prior, where w = games ÷ (games + 8). After 3 games, w is 27%, so the preseason prior is 73% of this rating — mostly preseason, for now. Every game played shrinks that share.

PartValueWeightAdds
Margin counted-22.5 avg× 27%-6.1
Opponents faced+14.5 avg× 27%+4.0
Preseason prior-12.3× 73%-9.0
Power-11.1

This explains how the model reached the number. The opponent ratings come out of the same fitted model, so it is not independent proof that the rating is right.

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the result against expectation. Adds is a different question: how many points of Power the game contributes, counting its margin and the strength of the opponent together. A game can beat expectation and still add little, or the reverse. Adds, plus the preseason prior, sum to Power (figures are rounded so the column adds up). Hover an Adds figure for its arithmetic.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerfAdds
2 at UNLV L 77–89 -18.6 +6.6 -0.4
2 at New Mexico L 65–94 -28.3 -0.7 -1.3
3 at Arizona L 59–90 -39.0 +8.0 -0.4
Preseason prior (73% of the rating)-9.0
Power-11.1

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
3 at Kentucky -31.7 0%
4 vs Embry-Riddle (AZ) non-D1 +25.0 99%
4 at Cal Poly -9.7 19%
5 at Cal State Bakersfield -2.8 40%
6 vs Montana -4.9 33%
6 vs Montana State -9.8 19%
9 at Iowa State -41.4 0%
10 at Weber State -1.9 43%

Season by season

Best finish: #107 in 2007–08. 22 seasons rated. The two columns' numbers are not comparable; the rank within each is. Season links open that year's game log.

25 1 400 2004–05 (MRI Classic): #212 of 326 (10-17)2005–06 (MRI Classic): #121 of 326 (21-11)2006–07 (MRI Classic): #132 of 326 (18-12)2007–08 (MRI Classic): #107 of 328 (21-11)2008–09 (MRI Classic): #238 of 330 (8-19)2009–10 (MRI Classic): #223 of 335 (14-14)2010–11 (MRI Classic): #125 of 346 (19-13)2011–12 (MRI Classic): #326 of 345 (5-23)2012–13 (MRI Classic): #302 of 347 (11-21)2013–14 (MRI Classic): #229 of 351 (15-17)2014–15 (MRI Classic): #139 of 351 (23-15)2015–16 (MRI Classic): #341 of 351 (5-25)2016–17 (MRI Classic): #321 of 351 (9-23)2017–18 (MRI Classic): #337 of 351 (5-27)2018–19 (MRI Classic): #296 of 353 (10-21)2019–20 (MRI Classic): #204 of 353 (14-14)2020–21 (MRI 2.0): #297 of 347 (6-16)2021–22 (MRI 2.0): #312 of 358 (9-23)2022–23 (MRI 2.0): #234 of 363 (12-23)2023–24 (MRI 2.0): #313 of 362 (14-19)2024–25 (MRI 2.0): #237 of 364 (18-16)2025–26 (MRI 2.0): #314 of 365 (10-22) MRI 2.0Classic 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 400 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Two lines where both ratings cover a season - MRI 2.0 in red, Classic in grey. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRec MRI 2.0MRI Classic
2025–26 10–22 #314 of 365 · -11.75 –
2024–25 18–16 #237 of 364 · -5.18 –
2023–24 14–19 #313 of 362 · -10.21 –
2022–23 12–23 #234 of 363 · -4.44 –
2021–22 9–23 #312 of 358 · -10.93 –
2020–21 6–16 #297 of 347 · -9.13 –
2019–20 14–14 – #204 of 353 · 16.85
2018–19 10–21 – #296 of 353 · -26.75
2017–18 5–27 – #337 of 351 · -64.06
2016–17 9–23 – #321 of 351 · -42.46
2015–16 5–25 – #341 of 351 · -71.23
2014–15 23–15 – #139 of 351 · 50.20
2013–14 15–17 – #229 of 351 · 13.55
2012–13 11–21 – #302 of 347 · -33.81
2011–12 5–23 – #326 of 345 · -60.31
2010–11 19–13 – #125 of 346 · 56.82
2009–10 14–14 – #223 of 335 · 9.91
2008–09 8–19 – #238 of 330 · 1.07
2007–08 21–11 – #107 of 328 · 67.32
2006–07 18–12 – #132 of 326 · 48.16
2005–06 21–11 – #121 of 326 · 53.92
2004–05 10–17 – #212 of 326 · 14.75