The MRI
2025–26 · Final
MRI Champion · 3 basketball titles 2004–05, 2006–07, 2008–09

North Carolina

ACC · 24–9

Power+17.7#29 of 365
Résumé+14.22#24 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winDuke (71–68)
Worst lossCalifornia (78–84)
Schedule faced+9.4 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 vs Central Arkansas W 94–54 +22.2 +17.8
1 vs Kansas W 87–74 +0.2 +12.8
2 vs Radford W 89–74 +24.7 -9.7
2 vs North Carolina Central W 97–53 +34.6 +9.4
3 vs Navy W 73–61 +20.0 -8.0
4 N St. Bonaventure W 85–70 +15.1 -0.1
4 N Michigan State L 58–74 -6.7 -9.3
5 at Kentucky W 67–64 -3.2 +6.2
5 vs Georgetown W 81–61 +13.5 +6.5
6 vs South Carolina Upstate W 80–62 +29.9 -11.9
7 vs East Tennessee State W 77–58 +17.0 +2.0
7 N Ohio State W 71–70 +0.1 +0.9
8 vs East Carolina W 99–51 +27.8 +20.2
9 vs Florida State W 79–66 +11.7 +1.3
9 at SMU L 83–97 +1.0 -15.0
10 vs Wake Forest W 87–84 +11.6 -8.6
11 at Stanford L 90–95 +5.9 -10.9
11 at California L 78–84 +7.9 -13.9
12 vs Notre Dame W 91–69 +15.4 +6.6
12 at Virginia W 85–80 -3.3 +8.3
13 at Georgia Tech W 91–75 +16.2 -0.2
14 vs Syracuse W 87–77 +14.4 -4.4
14 vs Duke W 71–68 -11.4 +14.4
15 at Miami L 66–75 +1.4 -10.4
15 vs Pittsburgh W 79–65 +14.8 -0.8
16 at NC State L 58–82 +1.2 -25.2
16 at Syracuse W 77–64 +8.9 +4.1
17 vs Louisville W 77–74 +0.5 +2.5
17 vs Virginia Tech W 89–82 +11.5 -4.5
18 vs Clemson W 67–63 +4.5 -0.5
18 at Duke L 61–76 -16.8 +1.8
19 N Clemson L 79–80 +1.8 -2.8
20 N VCU L 78–82 +2.6 -6.6

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #1 in 2008–09. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 150 2004–05: #1 of 326 (33-4)2005–06: #11 of 326 (23-8)2006–07: #1 of 326 (31-7)2007–08: #3 of 328 (36-3)2008–09: #1 of 330 (34-4)2009–10: #78 of 335 (20-17)2010–11: #15 of 346 (29-8)2011–12: #3 of 345 (32-6)2012–13: #29 of 347 (23-10)2013–14: #33 of 351 (24-10)2014–15: #10 of 351 (26-12)2015–16: #2 of 351 (33-7)2016–17: #2 of 351 (33-7)2017–18: #8 of 351 (26-11)2018–19: #4 of 353 (29-7)2019–20: #109 of 353 (14-19)2020–21: #46 of 347 (18-11)2021–22: #18 of 358 (29-10)2022–23: #32 of 363 (20-13)2023–24: #9 of 362 (29-8)2024–25: #25 of 364 (23-14)2025–26: #29 of 365 (24-9) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 150 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 29 of 365 24–9 17.69 Power
2024–25 25 of 364 23–14 16.99 Power
2023–24 9 of 362 29–8 20.27 Power
2022–23 32 of 363 20–13 13.14 Power
2021–22 18 of 358 29–10 14.93 Power
2020–21 46 of 347 18–11 10.05 Power
2019–20 109 of 353 14–19 60.51 MRI
2018–19 4 of 353 29–7 208.42 MRI
2017–18 8 of 351 26–11 174.29 MRI
2016–17 2 of 351 33–7 233.20 MRI
2015–16 2 of 351 33–7 230.85 MRI
2014–15 10 of 351 26–12 165.71 MRI
2013–14 33 of 351 24–10 130.78 MRI
2012–13 29 of 347 23–10 125.29 MRI
2011–12 3 of 345 32–6 232.98 MRI
2010–11 15 of 346 29–8 157.93 MRI
2009–10 78 of 335 20–17 84.98 MRI
2008–09 1 of 330 34–4 259.81 MRI
2007–08 3 of 328 36–3 265.70 MRI
2006–07 1 of 326 31–7 258.60 MRI
2005–06 11 of 326 23–8 149.42 MRI
2004–05 1 of 326 33–4 247.54 MRI