The MRI
2025–26 · Final

South Florida

American · 25–9

Power+12.6#51 of 365
Résumé+10.32#50 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winUtah State (74–61)
Worst lossTemple (78–79)
Schedule faced+1.9 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 vs Florida A&M W 102–67 +28.1 +6.9
1 N George Washington L 95–99 +4.8 -8.8
2 vs Coppin State W 100–50 +38.4 +11.6
2 at Kennesaw State W 108–89 +7.3 +11.7
3 at Oklahoma State L 95–103 +2.0 -10.0
4 N VCU L 66–78 -2.5 -9.5
4 N Western Kentucky W 97–91 +11.6 -5.6
4 N Colorado State L 68–83 +3.9 -18.9
5 vs Utah State W 74–61 -2.8 +15.8
6 vs Charleston W 81–75 +14.9 -8.9
7 at Alabama L 93–104 -14.6 +3.6
7 vs UMBC W 94–69 +16.3 +8.7
9 vs Georgia College non-D1 W 111–50 +53.1 +7.9
9 vs UAB L 106–109 +11.0 -14.0
10 at North Texas W 74–70 +6.6 -2.6
10 at Tulsa W 93–78 +0.3 +14.7
11 vs East Carolina W 82–71 +22.7 -11.7
11 vs Wichita State L 85–86 +6.7 -7.7
12 at UAB W 82–69 +5.5 +7.5
12 vs Florida Atlantic W 89–75 +11.1 +2.9
13 at Tulane W 97–83 +13.5 +0.5
13 at Temple L 78–79 +9.7 -10.7
14 vs UTSA W 109–88 +30.0 -9.0
14 vs Tulsa W 80–74 +5.8 +0.2
15 at Wichita State W 66–58 +1.3 +6.8
15 at Florida Atlantic W 83–81 +5.7 -3.7
16 vs Memphis W 87–66 +11.3 +9.7
17 at Rice W 75–56 +15.1 +3.9
17 vs Tulane W 90–62 +19.0 +9.0
18 at Memphis W 96–89 +5.9 +1.1
18 vs Charlotte W 83–60 +18.2 +4.8
19 N Charlotte W 86–64 +15.5 +6.5
19 N Wichita State W 70–55 +4.0 +11.0
20 N Louisville L 79–83 -7.4 +3.4

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #51 in 2025–26. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 400 2004–05: #142 of 326 (14-16)2005–06: #248 of 326 (7-22)2006–07: #184 of 326 (12-18)2007–08: #164 of 328 (12-19)2008–09: #240 of 330 (9-22)2009–10: #102 of 335 (20-13)2010–11: #235 of 346 (10-23)2011–12: #83 of 345 (22-12)2012–13: #185 of 347 (12-19)2013–14: #233 of 351 (12-20)2014–15: #302 of 351 (9-23)2015–16: #297 of 351 (8-25)2016–17: #327 of 351 (7-23)2017–18: #306 of 351 (10-22)2018–19: #66 of 353 (23-14)2019–20: #141 of 353 (14-17)2020–21: #219 of 347 (9-13)2021–22: #269 of 358 (8-23)2022–23: #193 of 363 (14-18)2023–24: #97 of 362 (25-8)2024–25: #181 of 364 (13-19)2025–26: #51 of 365 (25-9) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 400 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 51 of 365 25–9 12.55 Power
2024–25 181 of 364 13–19 -1.16 Power
2023–24 97 of 362 25–8 5.81 Power
2022–23 193 of 363 14–18 -1.22 Power
2021–22 269 of 358 8–23 -6.85 Power
2020–21 219 of 347 9–13 -3.20 Power
2019–20 141 of 353 14–17 45.31 MRI
2018–19 66 of 353 23–14 85.09 MRI
2017–18 306 of 351 10–22 -28.92 MRI
2016–17 327 of 351 7–23 -47.34 MRI
2015–16 297 of 351 8–25 -25.78 MRI
2014–15 302 of 351 9–23 -26.23 MRI
2013–14 233 of 351 12–20 10.76 MRI
2012–13 185 of 347 12–19 23.82 MRI
2011–12 83 of 345 22–12 81.04 MRI
2010–11 235 of 346 10–23 5.68 MRI
2009–10 102 of 335 20–13 67.09 MRI
2008–09 240 of 330 9–22 0.73 MRI
2007–08 164 of 328 12–19 34.85 MRI
2006–07 184 of 326 12–18 23.46 MRI
2005–06 248 of 326 7–22 -4.39 MRI
2004–05 142 of 326 14–16 40.00 MRI