The MRI
2025–26 · Final

Loyola Chicago

A-10 · 9–24

Power-7.7#277 of 365
Résumé-5.30#619 · wins above average
Trendrating by week
Best winSanta Clara (80–78)
Worst lossChicago State (75–84)
Schedule faced+2.6 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 vs Cleveland State W 91–88 +5.7 -2.7
1 vs Mercyhurst L 65–73 +3.9 -11.9
1 N North Texas L 62–64 -10.9 +8.9
2 at Wichita State L 74–95 -19.0 -2.0
2 vs Colorado State L 67–80 -13.6 +0.6
3 vs Northern Illinois L 59–76 +9.9 -26.9
4 N Northern Iowa L 51–72 -17.1 -3.9
4 N San José State L 51–63 -2.0 -10.0
5 vs Central Michigan W 83–72 +2.3 +8.7
5 vs Princeton W 73–68 -0.3 +5.2
6 vs Chicago State L 75–84 +12.6 -21.6
7 N San Francisco L 71–85 -11.7 -2.3
7 at Santa Clara W 80–78 -25.6 +27.6
9 at Rhode Island W 61–57 -11.7 +15.7
9 vs Dayton L 68–70 -14.8 +12.8
10 vs Davidson L 64–79 -8.0 -7.0
10 at George Washington L 66–101 -18.1 -16.9
11 vs George Mason L 74–82 -11.9 +3.9
11 at Dayton L 51–78 -20.3 -6.7
12 at St. Bonaventure L 70–84 -13.0 -1.0
12 vs Duquesne L 59–71 -6.9 -5.1
13 vs Saint Joseph's L 64–85 -9.2 -11.8
13 at VCU L 75–89 -25.5 +11.5
14 vs La Salle W 71–61 +1.0 +9.0
14 at Davidson L 64–84 -13.5 -6.5
15 vs Saint Louis L 59–86 -21.4 -5.6
16 at Fordham L 59–62 -8.8 +5.8
16 at Saint Joseph's L 61–75 -14.7 +0.7
17 vs Richmond W 69–66 -5.0 +8.0
18 at Saint Louis L 65–79 -26.9 +12.9
18 vs George Washington W 68–62 -12.7 +18.7
19 N Richmond W 75–67 -7.8 +15.8
19 N Davidson L 59–64 -10.7 +5.7

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
Season complete.

Season by season

Best finish: #12 in 2020–21. 22 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 300 2004–05: #228 of 326 (13-17)2005–06: #129 of 326 (19-11)2006–07: #90 of 326 (21-11)2007–08: #219 of 328 (12-19)2008–09: #245 of 330 (14-18)2009–10: #235 of 335 (14-16)2010–11: #122 of 346 (16-15)2011–12: #299 of 345 (7-23)2012–13: #172 of 347 (14-16)2013–14: #265 of 351 (10-22)2014–15: #123 of 351 (24-13)2015–16: #212 of 351 (15-17)2016–17: #101 of 351 (18-14)2017–18: #23 of 351 (32-6)2018–19: #91 of 353 (19-14)2019–20: #92 of 353 (20-11)2020–21: #12 of 347 (26-5)2021–22: #22 of 358 (25-8)2022–23: #220 of 363 (10-21)2023–24: #118 of 362 (23-10)2024–25: #104 of 364 (26-11)2025–26: #277 of 365 (9-24) 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 300 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025–26 277 of 365 9–24 -7.66 Power
2024–25 104 of 364 26–11 4.94 Power
2023–24 118 of 362 23–10 4.22 Power
2022–23 220 of 363 10–21 -3.22 Power
2021–22 22 of 358 25–8 14.34 Power
2020–21 12 of 347 26–5 16.15 Power
2019–20 92 of 353 20–11 71.49 MRI
2018–19 91 of 353 19–14 67.74 MRI
2017–18 23 of 351 32–6 137.07 MRI
2016–17 101 of 351 18–14 67.26 MRI
2015–16 212 of 351 15–17 14.31 MRI
2014–15 123 of 351 24–13 56.29 MRI
2013–14 265 of 351 10–22 -4.13 MRI
2012–13 172 of 347 14–16 27.96 MRI
2011–12 299 of 345 7–23 -30.26 MRI
2010–11 122 of 346 16–15 58.47 MRI
2009–10 235 of 335 14–16 6.10 MRI
2008–09 245 of 330 14–18 -0.06 MRI
2007–08 219 of 328 12–19 6.79 MRI
2006–07 90 of 326 21–11 73.44 MRI
2005–06 129 of 326 19–11 46.69 MRI
2004–05 228 of 326 13–17 8.45 MRI