The MRI
2026–27 · Week 3

Wright State

Horizon · 3–0

Power+6.3#100 of 365
Résumé+1.19#24 · wins above average
Movement+11up from #111 last week
Best winFlorida Atlantic (97–71)
Schedule faced-3.1 avg opponent
Schedule ahead-1.8 avg opponent
Returning production31% of last season's win shares · #120 of 364
Incoming production4.8 win shares from other schools' players

How this rating is built

Power = w × (average margin counted + average opponent rating) + (1 − w) × preseason prior, where w = games ÷ (games + 8). After 3 games, w is 27%, so the preseason prior is 73% of this rating — mostly preseason, for now. Every game played shrinks that share.

PartValueWeightAdds
Margin counted+25.3 avg× 27%+6.9
Opponents faced-3.1 avg× 27%-0.8
Preseason prior+0.3× 73%+0.2
Power+6.3

This explains how the model reached the number. The opponent ratings come out of the same fitted model, so it is not independent proof that the rating is right.

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the result against expectation. Adds is a different question: how many points of Power the game contributes, counting its margin and the strength of the opponent together. A game can beat expectation and still add little, or the reverse. Adds, plus the preseason prior, sum to Power (figures are rounded so the column adds up). Hover an Adds figure for its arithmetic.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerfAdds
2 vs Air Force W 102–71 +20.0 +11.0 +1.7
2 vs Florida Atlantic W 97–71 +8.0 +18.0 +2.5
3 at Toledo W 76–68 +3.2 +4.8 +1.9
Preseason prior (73% of the rating)+0.2
Power+6.3

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
3 at Samford +4.6 66%
4 vs Malone non-D1 +42.5 100%
5 N Akron -5.1 32%
5 N St. Bonaventure +4.8 67%
5 N Yale +3.0 61%
9 at Miami (OH) -4.1 36%

Season by season

Best finish: #43 in 2020–21. 22 seasons rated. The two columns' numbers are not comparable; the rank within each is. Season links open that year's game log.

25 1 300 2004–05 (MRI Classic): #168 of 326 (15-15)2005–06 (MRI Classic): #204 of 326 (13-15)2006–07 (MRI Classic): #88 of 326 (23-10)2007–08 (MRI Classic): #134 of 328 (21-10)2008–09 (MRI Classic): #110 of 330 (20-13)2009–10 (MRI Classic): #63 of 335 (20-12)2010–11 (MRI Classic): #127 of 346 (19-14)2011–12 (MRI Classic): #236 of 345 (13-19)2012–13 (MRI Classic): #120 of 347 (20-12)2013–14 (MRI Classic): #124 of 351 (21-15)2014–15 (MRI Classic): #277 of 351 (11-20)2015–16 (MRI Classic): #159 of 351 (22-13)2016–17 (MRI Classic): #137 of 351 (20-12)2017–18 (MRI Classic): #92 of 351 (25-10)2018–19 (MRI Classic): #93 of 353 (19-14)2019–20 (MRI Classic): #70 of 353 (23-7)2020–21 (MRI 2.0): #43 of 347 (18-6)2021–22 (MRI 2.0): #138 of 358 (22-14)2022–23 (MRI 2.0): #167 of 363 (18-15)2023–24 (MRI 2.0): #159 of 362 (18-14)2024–25 (MRI 2.0): #207 of 364 (15-18)2025–26 (MRI 2.0): #137 of 365 (23-12) MRI 2.0Classic 2004–05 2025–26

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 300 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Two lines where both ratings cover a season - MRI 2.0 in red, Classic in grey. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRec MRI 2.0MRI Classic
2025–26 23–12 #137 of 365 · 2.02 –
2024–25 15–18 #207 of 364 · -3.09 –
2023–24 18–14 #159 of 362 · 0.96 –
2022–23 18–15 #167 of 363 · 0.03 –
2021–22 22–14 #138 of 358 · 2.76 –
2020–21 18–6 #43 of 347 · 10.72 –
2019–20 23–7 – #70 of 353 · 83.02
2018–19 19–14 – #93 of 353 · 67.31
2017–18 25–10 – #92 of 351 · 78.75
2016–17 20–12 – #137 of 351 · 51.45
2015–16 22–13 – #159 of 351 · 47.89
2014–15 11–20 – #277 of 351 · -9.29
2013–14 21–15 – #124 of 351 · 56.26
2012–13 20–12 – #120 of 347 · 51.92
2011–12 13–19 – #236 of 345 · 5.82
2010–11 19–14 – #127 of 346 · 55.88
2009–10 20–12 – #63 of 335 · 96.54
2008–09 20–13 – #110 of 330 · 61.48
2007–08 21–10 – #134 of 328 · 51.09
2006–07 23–10 – #88 of 326 · 74.39
2005–06 13–15 – #204 of 326 · 19.01
2004–05 15–15 – #168 of 326 · 29.84