The MRI
2026 · Week 11

Charlotte

American · 1–8 · 1–4 in conference · MRI Classic #132

Power-23.1#134 of 138
Résumé-4.49#231 · wins above average
Playoff chance<0.1%out of the picture
Trendrating by week

Who to root for this week

Nothing this weekend moves the needle.

Nothing this weekend moves the needle.

Best winTemple (38–31)
Worst lossThe Citadel (41–43)
Schedule faced-5.6 avg opponent
Schedule ahead-3.9 avg opponent
Roster talent#100 of 127 · worth -5.7, rated -23.1: short of it
Returning production41% of last year's · #64 of 128
Home field+2.4 pts · 109th of 131

How this rating is built

Power = w × (average margin counted + average opponent rating) + (1 − w) × preseason prior, where w = games ÷ (games + 4). After 9 games, w is 69%, so the preseason prior is 31% of this rating. Every game played shrinks that share.

PartValueWeightAdds
Margin counted-19.6 avg× 69%-13.5
Opponents faced-5.6 avg× 69%-3.9
Preseason prior-18.4× 31%-5.7
Power-23.1

This explains how the model reached the number. The opponent ratings come out of the same fitted model, so it is not independent proof that the rating is right.

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the result against expectation. Adds is a different question: how many points of Power the game contributes, counting its margin and the strength of the opponent together. A game can beat expectation and still add little, or the reverse. Adds, plus the preseason prior, sum to Power (figures are rounded so the column adds up). Hover an Adds figure for its arithmetic.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerfAdds
1 vs The Citadel FCS L 41–43 +13.6 -15.6 -3.1
2 at Ole Miss L 9–41 -47.7 +15.7 -0.9
3 at Appalachian State L 21–26 -14.6 +9.6 -1.2
4 vs Louisiana L 7–34 -17.5 -9.5 -2.9
5 vs Memphis L 8–59 -24.1 -26.9 -3.5
6 at North Texas L 10–50 -29.2 -10.8 -2.7
7 at Temple W 38–31 -15.0 +22.0 +0.1
9 vs Tulane L 31–38 -11.9 +4.9 -1.5
10 at UAB L 12–23 -15.6 +4.6 -1.7
Preseason prior (31% of the rating)-5.7
Power-23.1

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
11 vs East Carolina -14.5 19%
12 at Tulsa -24.0 7%
13 vs Navy -16.1 16%

Coaches

CoachYearsRecordMean added
Brad Lambert2015–201812-36-5.9
Will Healy2019–202215-24-8.8
Biff Poggi2023–20246-16-5.2
Tim Albin2025–20262-19-8.2

Season by season

Best finish: #83 in 2019. 11 seasons rated. The two columns' numbers are not comparable; the rank within each is. Season links open that year's game log.

25 1 150 2015 (MRI Classic): #123 of 128 (2-10)2016 (MRI Classic): #100 of 128 (4-8)2017 (MRI Classic): #124 of 130 (1-11)2018 (MRI Classic): #92 of 130 (5-7)2019 (MRI Classic): #83 of 130 (7-6)2015 (MRI 2.0): #127 of 128 (2-10)2016 (MRI 2.0): #123 of 128 (4-8)2017 (MRI 2.0): #128 of 130 (1-11)2018 (MRI 2.0): #113 of 130 (5-7)2019 (MRI 2.0): #111 of 130 (7-6)2020 (MRI 2.0): #104 of 128 (2-4)2021 (MRI 2.0): #113 of 130 (5-7)2022 (MRI 2.0): #128 of 131 (3-9)2023 (MRI 2.0): #123 of 133 (3-9)2024 (MRI 2.0): #114 of 134 (5-7)2025 (MRI 2.0): #135 of 136 (1-11) MRI 2.0Classic 2015 2025

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 150 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Two lines where both ratings cover a season - MRI 2.0 in red, Classic in grey. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRec MRI 2.0MRI Classic
2025 1–11 #135 of 136 · -23.66 –
2024 5–7 #114 of 134 · -13.21 –
2023 3–9 #123 of 133 · -16.89 –
2022 3–9 #128 of 131 · -19.65 –
2021 5–7 #113 of 130 · -15.08 –
2020 2–4 #104 of 128 · -11.39 –
2019 7–6 #111 of 130 · -11.83 #83 of 130 · 7.32
2018 5–7 #113 of 130 · -16.43 #92 of 130 · 0.78
2017 1–11 #128 of 130 · -27.21 #124 of 130 · -59.68
2016 4–8 #123 of 128 · -20.38 #100 of 128 · -13.61
2015 2–10 #127 of 128 · -27.41 #123 of 128 · -58.70