The MRI
2026 · Week 11

Memphis

American · 8–2 · 5–1 in conference · MRI Classic #19

Power+4.0#50 of 138
Résumé+1.28#44 · wins above average
Playoff chance3.0%#33 most likely · +1.5 pts this week
Trendrating by week

Who to root for this week

2 games · top: Oregon State over Boise State, +4.1 pts playoff odds

The games this week that move its playoff odds most, and the side to cheer. Other teams’ games only; its own game is in the schedule below. How these are worked out.

Best winUSF (52–41)
Worst lossTulane (17–31)
Schedule faced-8.9 avg opponent
Schedule ahead-7.5 avg opponent
Roster talent#65 of 127 · worth -0.7, rated +4.0: in line with it
Returning production6% of last year's · #121 of 128 · counted against its preseason rating
Home field+3.0 pts · 63rd of 131
The Hidden Heisman Hidden HeismanJaylin Carter · Week 1

How this rating is built

Power = w × (average margin counted + average opponent rating) + (1 − w) × preseason prior, where w = games ÷ (games + 4). After 10 games, w is 71%, so the preseason prior is 29% of this rating. Every game played shrinks that share.

PartValueWeightAdds
Margin counted+15.1 avg× 71%+10.8
Opponents faced-8.9 avg× 71%-6.3
Preseason prior-1.7× 29%-0.5
Power+4.0

This explains how the model reached the number. The opponent ratings come out of the same fitted model, so it is not independent proof that the rating is right.

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the result against expectation. Adds is a different question: how many points of Power the game contributes, counting its margin and the strength of the opponent together. A game can beat expectation and still add little, or the reverse. Adds, plus the preseason prior, sum to Power (figures are rounded so the column adds up). Hover an Adds figure for its arithmetic.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerfAdds
1 at UNLV W 27–21 +7.1 -1.1 +0.4
1 vs Arkansas State W 42–24 +18.0 +0.0 +0.6
2 at Boise State L 20–38 -10.5 -7.5 -0.6
3 vs UT Martin FCS W 45–21 +40.7 -16.7 -0.8
5 at Charlotte W 59–8 +24.1 +26.9 +1.9
6 vs UAB W 38–13 +17.6 +7.4 +1.2
7 at Tulane L 17–31 +9.2 -23.2 -1.7
8 vs East Carolina W 41–34 +12.6 -5.6 +0.1
9 vs Army W 49–22 +6.7 +20.3 +2.1
11 at USF W 52–41 -0.5 +11.5 +1.3
Preseason prior (29% of the rating)-0.5
Power+4.0

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
12 at Navy +4.9 62%
13 vs Temple +18.1 86%

The Hidden Heisman Hidden Heisman

The week’s biggest game from outside the power conferences, from a player the Heisman odds were not talking about. How it is picked.

SeasonWkPlayerOpponentLine
20261Jaylin Cartervs Arkansas State183 rush, 4 TD

Coaches

Mean added leaves out 1978–1980, the first seasons rated, which have no preseason prior to measure against.

CoachYearsRecordMean added
Richard Williamson1978–198011-22–
Rex Dockery1981–19838-24-1+1.3
Rey Dempsey1984–19857-12-3-1.6
Charlie Bailey1986–198812-20-1-2.4
Chuck Stobart1989–199429-36-1-0.3
Rip Scherer1995–200022-44-2.0
Tommy West2001–200949-61-3.1
Larry Porter2010–20113-21-12.0
Justin Fuente2012–201526-23+4.9
Mike Norvell2016–201938-16+3.0
Ryan Silverfield2020–202550-24+1.1
Charles Huff20268-2+0.1

Season by season

Best finish: #19 in 2003. 48 seasons rated. The two columns' numbers are not comparable; the rank within each is. Season links open that year's game log.

25 1 150 2003 (MRI Classic): #19 of 117 (9-4)2004 (MRI Classic): #43 of 117 (8-4)2005 (MRI Classic): #63 of 119 (7-5)2006 (MRI Classic): #102 of 119 (2-10)2007 (MRI Classic): #77 of 120 (7-6)2008 (MRI Classic): #69 of 120 (6-7)2009 (MRI Classic): #111 of 120 (2-10)2010 (MRI Classic): #120 of 120 (1-11)2011 (MRI Classic): #115 of 120 (2-10)2012 (MRI Classic): #104 of 124 (4-8)2013 (MRI Classic): #104 of 126 (3-9)2014 (MRI Classic): #21 of 128 (10-3)2015 (MRI Classic): #41 of 128 (9-4)2016 (MRI Classic): #54 of 128 (8-5)2017 (MRI Classic): #26 of 130 (10-3)2018 (MRI Classic): #49 of 130 (8-6)2019 (MRI Classic): #20 of 130 (12-2)1978 (MRI 2.0): #104 of 138 (4-7)1979 (MRI 2.0): #102 of 138 (5-6)1980 (MRI 2.0): #123 of 138 (2-9)1981 (MRI 2.0): #117 of 136 (1-10)1982 (MRI 2.0): #92 of 105 (1-10)1983 (MRI 2.0): #43 of 105 (6-5)1984 (MRI 2.0): #46 of 106 (5-6)1985 (MRI 2.0): #63 of 106 (2-9)1986 (MRI 2.0): #97 of 105 (1-10)1987 (MRI 2.0): #68 of 104 (5-6)1988 (MRI 2.0): #59 of 104 (6-5)1989 (MRI 2.0): #85 of 106 (2-9)1990 (MRI 2.0): #72 of 107 (4-7)1991 (MRI 2.0): #57 of 107 (5-6)1992 (MRI 2.0): #31 of 107 (6-5)1993 (MRI 2.0): #40 of 106 (6-5)1994 (MRI 2.0): #63 of 107 (6-5)1995 (MRI 2.0): #75 of 108 (3-8)1996 (MRI 2.0): #71 of 111 (4-7)1997 (MRI 2.0): #77 of 112 (4-7)1998 (MRI 2.0): #87 of 112 (2-9)1999 (MRI 2.0): #55 of 114 (5-6)2000 (MRI 2.0): #75 of 116 (4-7)2001 (MRI 2.0): #71 of 117 (5-6)2002 (MRI 2.0): #80 of 117 (3-9)2003 (MRI 2.0): #57 of 117 (9-4)2004 (MRI 2.0): #58 of 117 (8-4)2005 (MRI 2.0): #69 of 119 (7-5)2006 (MRI 2.0): #98 of 119 (2-10)2007 (MRI 2.0): #98 of 119 (7-6)2008 (MRI 2.0): #90 of 120 (6-7)2009 (MRI 2.0): #106 of 120 (2-10)2010 (MRI 2.0): #116 of 120 (1-11)2011 (MRI 2.0): #117 of 120 (2-10)2012 (MRI 2.0): #114 of 124 (4-8)2013 (MRI 2.0): #100 of 125 (3-9)2014 (MRI 2.0): #42 of 128 (10-3)2015 (MRI 2.0): #40 of 128 (9-4)2016 (MRI 2.0): #48 of 128 (8-5)2017 (MRI 2.0): #33 of 130 (10-3)2018 (MRI 2.0): #51 of 130 (8-6)2019 (MRI 2.0): #20 of 130 (12-2)2020 (MRI 2.0): #53 of 128 (8-3)2021 (MRI 2.0): #81 of 130 (6-6)2022 (MRI 2.0): #53 of 131 (7-6)2023 (MRI 2.0): #45 of 133 (10-3)2024 (MRI 2.0): #45 of 134 (11-2)2025 (MRI 2.0): #60 of 136 (8-5) MRI 2.0Classic 1978 2025

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 150 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Two lines where both ratings cover a season - MRI 2.0 in red, Classic in grey. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRec MRI 2.0MRI Classic
2025 8–5 #60 of 136 · 2.89 –
2024 11–2 #45 of 134 · 5.48 –
2023 10–3 #45 of 133 · 5.50 –
2022 7–6 #53 of 131 · 5.07 –
2021 6–6 #81 of 130 · -2.14 –
2020 8–3 #53 of 128 · 3.26 –
2019 12–2 #20 of 130 · 13.15 #20 of 130 · 69.59
2018 8–6 #51 of 130 · 5.39 #49 of 130 · 34.57
2017 10–3 #33 of 130 · 8.96 #26 of 130 · 60.25
2016 8–5 #48 of 128 · 5.85 #54 of 128 · 29.30
2015 9–4 #40 of 128 · 8.62 #41 of 128 · 46.98
2014 10–3 #42 of 128 · 6.46 #21 of 128 · 61.83
2013 3–9 #100 of 125 · -11.97 #104 of 126 · -20.29
2012 4–8 #114 of 124 · -18.04 #104 of 124 · -20.59
2011 2–10 #117 of 120 · -26.62 #115 of 120 · -59.93
2010 1–11 #116 of 120 · -25.74 #120 of 120 · -79.27
2009 2–10 #106 of 120 · -15.22 #111 of 120 · -40.19
2008 6–7 #90 of 120 · -9.41 #69 of 120 · 15.67
2007 7–6 #98 of 119 · -13.33 #77 of 120 · 12.14
2006 2–10 #98 of 119 · -11.02 #102 of 119 · -18.03
2005 7–5 #69 of 119 · -1.45 #63 of 119 · 26.48
2004 8–4 #58 of 117 · 1.10 #43 of 117 · 38.26
2003 9–4 #57 of 117 · 1.84 #19 of 117 · 69.79
2002 3–9 #80 of 117 · -7.32 –
2001 5–6 #71 of 117 · -2.44 –
2000 4–7 #75 of 116 · -4.05 –
1999 5–6 #55 of 114 · 1.29 –
1998 2–9 #87 of 112 · -10.52 –
1997 4–7 #77 of 112 · -6.20 –
1996 4–7 #71 of 111 · -6.08 –
1995 3–8 #75 of 108 · -7.33 –
1994 6–5 #63 of 107 · -1.17 –
1993 6–5 #40 of 106 · 4.03 –
1992 6–5 #31 of 107 · 5.89 –
1991 5–6 #57 of 107 · -0.71 –
1990 4–7 #72 of 107 · -5.25 –
1989 2–9 #85 of 106 · -11.67 –
1988 6–5 #59 of 104 · -2.35 –
1987 5–6 #68 of 104 · -5.65 –
1986 1–10 #97 of 105 · -17.31 –
1985 2–9 #63 of 106 · -2.36 –
1984 5–6 #46 of 106 · 2.20 –
1983 6–5 #43 of 105 · 2.48 –
1982 1–10 #92 of 105 · -14.74 –
1981 1–10 #117 of 136 · -10.03 –
1980 2–9 #123 of 138 · -13.02 –
1979 5–6 #102 of 138 · -6.84 –
1978 4–7 #104 of 138 · -7.78 –