The MRI
2026 · Week 11

Tulsa

American · 5–4 · 2–3 in conference · MRI Classic #63

Power-2.1#78 of 138
Résumé-0.78#158 · wins above average
Playoff chance<0.1%out of the picture
Trendrating by week

Who to root for this week

Nothing this weekend moves the needle.

Nothing this weekend moves the needle.

Best winOklahoma State (24–10)
Worst lossNavy (26–34)
Schedule faced-8.5 avg opponent
Schedule ahead-9.3 avg opponent
Roster talent#82 of 127 · worth -3.2, rated -2.1: in line with it
Returning production41% of last year's · #63 of 128
Home field+2.5 pts · 102nd of 131

How this rating is built

Power = w × (average margin counted + average opponent rating) + (1 − w) × preseason prior, where w = games ÷ (games + 4). After 9 games, w is 69%, so the preseason prior is 31% of this rating. Every game played shrinks that share.

PartValueWeightAdds
Margin counted+10.5 avg× 69%+7.3
Opponents faced-8.5 avg× 69%-5.9
Preseason prior-11.4× 31%-3.5
Power-2.1

This explains how the model reached the number. The opponent ratings come out of the same fitted model, so it is not independent proof that the rating is right.

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the result against expectation. Adds is a different question: how many points of Power the game contributes, counting its margin and the strength of the opponent together. A game can beat expectation and still add little, or the reverse. Adds, plus the preseason prior, sum to Power (figures are rounded so the column adds up). Hover an Adds figure for its arithmetic.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerfAdds
1 vs Oklahoma State W 24–10 -6.1 +20.1 +1.7
2 at Sam Houston W 23–17 +16.9 -10.9 -0.8
3 vs East Texas A&M FCS W 42–0 +34.6 +7.4 +0.1
4 at Arkansas L 6–34 -6.3 -21.7 -2.2
5 vs North Texas L 44–45 -2.2 +1.2 -0.1
6 at Navy L 26–34 -1.1 -6.9 -0.9
7 at Rice W 38–17 +10.8 +10.2 +1.0
8 vs Army L 35–38 +0.6 -3.6 -0.5
10 at Tulane W 60–10 +3.1 +46.9 +3.1
Preseason prior (31% of the rating)-3.5
Power-2.1

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
11 vs Florida Atlantic +6.9 66%
12 vs Charlotte +24.0 93%
13 at UTSA -6.5 35%

Coaches

Mean added leaves out 1978–1980, the first seasons rated, which have no preseason prior to measure against.

CoachYearsRecordMean added
John Cooper1978–198453-24+0.4
Don Morton1985–198613-9-0.9
George Henshaw19873-8-11.9
David Rader1988–199950-83-1-2.9
Keith Burns2000–20027-28-6.9
Steve Kragthorpe2003–200629-22+3.0
Todd Graham2007–201036-17+1.2
Bill Blankenship2011–201424-27-5.1
Philip Montgomery2015–202243-53+0.1
Kevin Wilson2023–20247-16-10.2
Tre Lamb2025–20269-12+2.2

Season by season

Best finish: #11 in 2008. 48 seasons rated. The two columns' numbers are not comparable; the rank within each is. Season links open that year's game log.

25 1 150 2003 (MRI Classic): #60 of 117 (8-5)2004 (MRI Classic): #95 of 117 (4-8)2005 (MRI Classic): #21 of 119 (9-4)2006 (MRI Classic): #35 of 119 (8-5)2007 (MRI Classic): #26 of 120 (10-4)2008 (MRI Classic): #11 of 120 (11-3)2009 (MRI Classic): #81 of 120 (5-7)2010 (MRI Classic): #28 of 120 (10-3)2011 (MRI Classic): #25 of 120 (8-5)2012 (MRI Classic): #25 of 124 (11-3)2013 (MRI Classic): #103 of 126 (3-9)2014 (MRI Classic): #118 of 128 (2-10)2015 (MRI Classic): #84 of 128 (6-7)2016 (MRI Classic): #21 of 128 (10-3)2017 (MRI Classic): #106 of 130 (2-10)2018 (MRI Classic): #104 of 130 (3-9)2019 (MRI Classic): #76 of 130 (4-8)1978 (MRI 2.0): #39 of 138 (9-2)1979 (MRI 2.0): #74 of 138 (6-5)1980 (MRI 2.0): #55 of 138 (8-3)1981 (MRI 2.0): #42 of 136 (6-5)1982 (MRI 2.0): #33 of 105 (10-1)1983 (MRI 2.0): #47 of 105 (8-3)1984 (MRI 2.0): #60 of 106 (6-5)1985 (MRI 2.0): #68 of 106 (6-5)1986 (MRI 2.0): #54 of 105 (7-4)1987 (MRI 2.0): #86 of 104 (3-8)1988 (MRI 2.0): #69 of 104 (4-7)1989 (MRI 2.0): #62 of 106 (6-6)1990 (MRI 2.0): #89 of 107 (3-8)1991 (MRI 2.0): #50 of 107 (10-2)1992 (MRI 2.0): #78 of 107 (4-7)1993 (MRI 2.0): #66 of 106 (4-7)1994 (MRI 2.0): #81 of 107 (3-8)1995 (MRI 2.0): #85 of 108 (4-7)1996 (MRI 2.0): #84 of 111 (4-7)1997 (MRI 2.0): #93 of 112 (2-9)1998 (MRI 2.0): #82 of 112 (4-7)1999 (MRI 2.0): #105 of 114 (2-9)2000 (MRI 2.0): #93 of 116 (5-7)2001 (MRI 2.0): #110 of 117 (1-10)2002 (MRI 2.0): #112 of 117 (1-11)2003 (MRI 2.0): #82 of 117 (8-5)2004 (MRI 2.0): #94 of 117 (4-8)2005 (MRI 2.0): #54 of 119 (9-4)2006 (MRI 2.0): #50 of 119 (8-5)2007 (MRI 2.0): #56 of 119 (10-4)2008 (MRI 2.0): #28 of 120 (11-3)2009 (MRI 2.0): #64 of 120 (5-7)2010 (MRI 2.0): #49 of 120 (10-3)2011 (MRI 2.0): #37 of 120 (8-5)2012 (MRI 2.0): #36 of 124 (11-3)2013 (MRI 2.0): #99 of 125 (3-9)2014 (MRI 2.0): #116 of 128 (2-10)2015 (MRI 2.0): #94 of 128 (6-7)2016 (MRI 2.0): #54 of 128 (10-3)2017 (MRI 2.0): #90 of 130 (2-10)2018 (MRI 2.0): #101 of 130 (3-9)2019 (MRI 2.0): #85 of 130 (4-8)2020 (MRI 2.0): #35 of 128 (6-3)2021 (MRI 2.0): #75 of 130 (7-6)2022 (MRI 2.0): #84 of 131 (5-7)2023 (MRI 2.0): #113 of 133 (4-8)2024 (MRI 2.0): #130 of 134 (3-9)2025 (MRI 2.0): #120 of 136 (4-8) MRI 2.0Classic 1978 2025

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 150 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Two lines where both ratings cover a season - MRI 2.0 in red, Classic in grey. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRec MRI 2.0MRI Classic
2025 4–8 #120 of 136 · -15.44 –
2024 3–9 #130 of 134 · -23.18 –
2023 4–8 #113 of 133 · -11.67 –
2022 5–7 #84 of 131 · -4.29 –
2021 7–6 #75 of 130 · 0.04 –
2020 6–3 #35 of 128 · 7.62 –
2019 4–8 #85 of 130 · -4.75 #76 of 130 · 9.87
2018 3–9 #101 of 130 · -11.18 #104 of 130 · -23.66
2017 2–10 #90 of 130 · -6.75 #106 of 130 · -16.05
2016 10–3 #54 of 128 · 4.98 #21 of 128 · 60.08
2015 6–7 #94 of 128 · -8.79 #84 of 128 · 8.13
2014 2–10 #116 of 128 · -17.23 #118 of 128 · -37.19
2013 3–9 #99 of 125 · -11.33 #103 of 126 · -19.15
2012 11–3 #36 of 124 · 7.22 #25 of 124 · 56.84
2011 8–5 #37 of 120 · 6.12 #25 of 120 · 58.17
2010 10–3 #49 of 120 · 3.99 #28 of 120 · 57.95
2009 5–7 #64 of 120 · -1.30 #81 of 120 · 4.74
2008 11–3 #28 of 120 · 8.83 #11 of 120 · 79.68
2007 10–4 #56 of 119 · 1.86 #26 of 120 · 55.20
2006 8–5 #50 of 119 · 2.37 #35 of 119 · 48.81
2005 9–4 #54 of 119 · 2.35 #21 of 119 · 62.98
2004 4–8 #94 of 117 · -11.14 #95 of 117 · -7.38
2003 8–5 #82 of 117 · -7.77 #60 of 117 · 29.95
2002 1–11 #112 of 117 · -22.69 –
2001 1–10 #110 of 117 · -21.31 –
2000 5–7 #93 of 116 · -11.62 –
1999 2–9 #105 of 114 · -18.15 –
1998 4–7 #82 of 112 · -8.26 –
1997 2–9 #93 of 112 · -14.10 –
1996 4–7 #84 of 111 · -10.05 –
1995 4–7 #85 of 108 · -10.79 –
1994 3–8 #81 of 107 · -11.54 –
1993 4–7 #66 of 106 · -3.95 –
1992 4–7 #78 of 107 · -5.97 –
1991 10–2 #50 of 107 · 1.55 –
1990 3–8 #89 of 107 · -12.83 –
1989 6–6 #62 of 106 · -3.30 –
1988 4–7 #69 of 104 · -5.51 –
1987 3–8 #86 of 104 · -12.31 –
1986 7–4 #54 of 105 · -0.42 –
1985 6–5 #68 of 106 · -4.87 –
1984 6–5 #60 of 106 · -0.75 –
1983 8–3 #47 of 105 · 1.24 –
1982 10–1 #33 of 105 · 5.29 –
1981 6–5 #42 of 136 · 5.39 –
1980 8–3 #55 of 138 · 1.68 –
1979 6–5 #74 of 138 · -1.88 –
1978 9–2 #39 of 138 · 6.27 –