The MRI
2026 · Week 11

Tulane

American · 4–5 · 2–3 in conference · MRI Classic #115

Power-8.2#98 of 138
Résumé-1.30#187 · wins above average
Playoff chance<0.1%out of the picture
Trendrating by week

Who to root for this week

Nothing this weekend moves the needle.

Nothing this weekend moves the needle.

Best winMemphis (31–17)
Worst lossTulsa (10–60)
Schedule faced-3.7 avg opponent
Schedule ahead-3.8 avg opponent
Roster talent#68 of 127 · worth -1.0, rated -8.2: short of it
Returning production21% of last year's · #94 of 128 · counted against its preseason rating
Home field+3.3 pts · 34th of 131

How this rating is built

Power = w × (average margin counted + average opponent rating) + (1 − w) × preseason prior, where w = games ÷ (games + 4). After 9 games, w is 69%, so the preseason prior is 31% of this rating. Every game played shrinks that share.

PartValueWeightAdds
Margin counted-8.5 avg× 69%-5.9
Opponents faced-3.7 avg× 69%-2.5
Preseason prior+0.7× 31%+0.2
Power-8.2

This explains how the model reached the number. The opponent ratings come out of the same fitted model, so it is not independent proof that the rating is right.

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the result against expectation. Adds is a different question: how many points of Power the game contributes, counting its margin and the strength of the opponent together. A game can beat expectation and still add little, or the reverse. Adds, plus the preseason prior, sum to Power (figures are rounded so the column adds up). Hover an Adds figure for its arithmetic.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerfAdds
1 at Duke L 3–17 -21.2 +7.2 -0.4
2 vs South Alabama W 28–24 +3.5 +0.5 -0.5
3 at Kansas State L 20–31 -12.1 +1.1 -0.8
4 vs Southern Miss W 24–21 +10.3 -7.3 -1.1
6 at Army L 17–20 -11.5 +8.5 -0.1
7 vs Memphis W 31–17 -9.2 +23.2 +1.5
8 vs UTSA L 19–42 -6.5 -16.5 -2.3
9 at Charlotte W 38–31 +11.9 -4.9 -0.8
10 vs Tulsa L 10–60 -3.1 -46.9 -3.9
Preseason prior (31% of the rating)+0.2
Power-8.2

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
11 at Rice +4.7 61%
12 vs North Texas -8.3 31%
13 at USF -12.7 22%

Coaches

Mean added leaves out 1978–1980, the first seasons rated, which have no preseason prior to measure against.

CoachYearsRecordMean added
Larry Smith1978–197913-10–
Vince Gibson1980–198217-17-2.3
Wally English1983–19847-15+0.0
Mack Brown1985–198711-23-2.9
Greg Davis1988–199114-31-4.8
Buddy Teevens1992–199610-46-3.6
Tommy Bowden1997–199818-4+9.2
Chris Scelfo1999–200636-57-5.8
Bob Toledo2007–201115-40-7.6
Curtis Johnson2013–201513-24-3.5
Willie Fritz2016–202354-47+2.1
Jon Sumrall2024–202520-8+6.3
Will Hall20264-5-0.1

Season by season

Best finish: #22 in 1998. 48 seasons rated. The two columns' numbers are not comparable; the rank within each is. Season links open that year's game log.

25 1 150 2003 (MRI Classic): #86 of 117 (5-7)2004 (MRI Classic): #90 of 117 (5-6)2005 (MRI Classic): #104 of 119 (2-9)2006 (MRI Classic): #106 of 119 (4-8)2007 (MRI Classic): #89 of 120 (4-8)2008 (MRI Classic): #113 of 120 (2-10)2009 (MRI Classic): #114 of 120 (3-9)2010 (MRI Classic): #101 of 120 (4-8)2011 (MRI Classic): #117 of 120 (2-11)2012 (MRI Classic): #118 of 124 (2-10)2013 (MRI Classic): #65 of 126 (7-6)2014 (MRI Classic): #107 of 128 (3-9)2015 (MRI Classic): #121 of 128 (3-9)2016 (MRI Classic): #91 of 128 (4-8)2017 (MRI Classic): #75 of 130 (5-7)2018 (MRI Classic): #71 of 130 (7-6)2019 (MRI Classic): #42 of 130 (7-6)1978 (MRI 2.0): #93 of 138 (4-7)1979 (MRI 2.0): #35 of 138 (9-3)1980 (MRI 2.0): #43 of 138 (7-5)1981 (MRI 2.0): #39 of 136 (6-5)1982 (MRI 2.0): #60 of 105 (4-7)1983 (MRI 2.0): #55 of 105 (4-7)1984 (MRI 2.0): #65 of 106 (3-8)1985 (MRI 2.0): #84 of 106 (1-10)1986 (MRI 2.0): #87 of 105 (4-7)1987 (MRI 2.0): #59 of 104 (6-6)1988 (MRI 2.0): #79 of 104 (5-6)1989 (MRI 2.0): #72 of 106 (4-8)1990 (MRI 2.0): #66 of 107 (4-7)1991 (MRI 2.0): #94 of 107 (1-10)1992 (MRI 2.0): #97 of 107 (2-9)1993 (MRI 2.0): #101 of 106 (3-9)1994 (MRI 2.0): #99 of 107 (1-10)1995 (MRI 2.0): #95 of 108 (2-9)1996 (MRI 2.0): #77 of 111 (2-9)1997 (MRI 2.0): #38 of 112 (7-4)1998 (MRI 2.0): #22 of 112 (12-0)1999 (MRI 2.0): #80 of 114 (3-8)2000 (MRI 2.0): #83 of 116 (6-5)2001 (MRI 2.0): #89 of 117 (3-9)2002 (MRI 2.0): #69 of 117 (8-5)2003 (MRI 2.0): #91 of 117 (5-7)2004 (MRI 2.0): #95 of 117 (5-6)2005 (MRI 2.0): #107 of 119 (2-9)2006 (MRI 2.0): #108 of 119 (4-8)2007 (MRI 2.0): #107 of 119 (4-8)2008 (MRI 2.0): #118 of 120 (2-10)2009 (MRI 2.0): #117 of 120 (3-9)2010 (MRI 2.0): #114 of 120 (4-8)2011 (MRI 2.0): #116 of 120 (2-11)2012 (MRI 2.0): #121 of 124 (2-10)2013 (MRI 2.0): #90 of 125 (7-6)2014 (MRI 2.0): #109 of 128 (3-9)2015 (MRI 2.0): #114 of 128 (3-9)2016 (MRI 2.0): #101 of 128 (4-8)2017 (MRI 2.0): #87 of 130 (5-7)2018 (MRI 2.0): #87 of 130 (7-6)2019 (MRI 2.0): #52 of 130 (7-6)2020 (MRI 2.0): #47 of 128 (6-6)2021 (MRI 2.0): #89 of 130 (2-10)2022 (MRI 2.0): #26 of 131 (12-2)2023 (MRI 2.0): #50 of 133 (11-3)2024 (MRI 2.0): #40 of 134 (9-5)2025 (MRI 2.0): #50 of 136 (11-3) MRI 2.0Classic 1978 2025

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 150 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Two lines where both ratings cover a season - MRI 2.0 in red, Classic in grey. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRec MRI 2.0MRI Classic
2025 11–3 #50 of 136 · 4.46 –
2024 9–5 #40 of 134 · 7.70 –
2023 11–3 #50 of 133 · 3.48 –
2022 12–2 #26 of 131 · 10.79 –
2021 2–10 #89 of 130 · -3.86 –
2020 6–6 #47 of 128 · 4.25 –
2019 7–6 #52 of 130 · 2.95 #42 of 130 · 33.79
2018 7–6 #87 of 130 · -4.24 #71 of 130 · 20.51
2017 5–7 #87 of 130 · -6.08 #75 of 130 · 16.87
2016 4–8 #101 of 128 · -12.11 #91 of 128 · -1.95
2015 3–9 #114 of 128 · -19.68 #121 of 128 · -46.69
2014 3–9 #109 of 128 · -13.38 #107 of 128 · -20.42
2013 7–6 #90 of 125 · -8.37 #65 of 126 · 22.86
2012 2–10 #121 of 124 · -22.81 #118 of 124 · -47.72
2011 2–11 #116 of 120 · -24.51 #117 of 120 · -68.37
2010 4–8 #114 of 120 · -21.41 #101 of 120 · -20.35
2009 3–9 #117 of 120 · -24.28 #114 of 120 · -52.18
2008 2–10 #118 of 120 · -21.43 #113 of 120 · -47.29
2007 4–8 #107 of 119 · -15.91 #89 of 120 · -4.19
2006 4–8 #108 of 119 · -16.86 #106 of 119 · -22.75
2005 2–9 #107 of 119 · -18.41 #104 of 119 · -22.70
2004 5–6 #95 of 117 · -11.59 #90 of 117 · -2.18
2003 5–7 #91 of 117 · -10.51 #86 of 117 · -0.77
2002 8–5 #69 of 117 · -2.13 –
2001 3–9 #89 of 117 · -10.80 –
2000 6–5 #83 of 116 · -5.68 –
1999 3–8 #80 of 114 · -5.67 –
1998 12–0 #22 of 112 · 12.12 –
1997 7–4 #38 of 112 · 5.26 –
1996 2–9 #77 of 111 · -6.88 –
1995 2–9 #95 of 108 · -16.79 –
1994 1–10 #99 of 107 · -19.28 –
1993 3–9 #101 of 106 · -19.74 –
1992 2–9 #97 of 107 · -14.20 –
1991 1–10 #94 of 107 · -14.96 –
1990 4–7 #66 of 107 · -3.82 –
1989 4–8 #72 of 106 · -6.88 –
1988 5–6 #79 of 104 · -10.15 –
1987 6–6 #59 of 104 · -2.46 –
1986 4–7 #87 of 105 · -12.32 –
1985 1–10 #84 of 106 · -11.37 –
1984 3–8 #65 of 106 · -1.84 –
1983 4–7 #55 of 105 · -1.95 –
1982 4–7 #60 of 105 · -2.56 –
1981 6–5 #39 of 136 · 6.65 –
1980 7–5 #43 of 138 · 4.90 –
1979 9–3 #35 of 138 · 7.85 –
1978 4–7 #93 of 138 · -4.75 –