The MRI
2026 · Week 11

Louisiana

Sun Belt · 7–3 · 4–2 in conference · MRI Classic #42

Power-2.6#79 of 138
Résumé-0.58#135 · wins above average
Playoff chance<0.1%out of the picture
Trendrating by week

Who to root for this week

Nothing this weekend moves the needle.

Nothing this weekend moves the needle.

Best winSouth Alabama (28–26)
Worst lossSouthern Miss (31–35)
Schedule faced-12.7 avg opponent
Schedule ahead-11.3 avg opponent
Roster talent#95 of 127 · worth -4.9, rated -2.6: in line with it
Returning production92% of last year's · #4 of 128
Home field+2.2 pts · 120th of 131

How this rating is built

Power = w × (average margin counted + average opponent rating) + (1 − w) × preseason prior, where w = games ÷ (games + 4). After 10 games, w is 71%, so the preseason prior is 29% of this rating. Every game played shrinks that share.

PartValueWeightAdds
Margin counted+11.0 avg× 71%+7.9
Opponents faced-12.7 avg× 71%-9.1
Preseason prior-4.9× 29%-1.4
Power-2.6

This explains how the model reached the number. The opponent ratings come out of the same fitted model, so it is not independent proof that the rating is right.

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the result against expectation. Adds is a different question: how many points of Power the game contributes, counting its margin and the strength of the opponent together. A game can beat expectation and still add little, or the reverse. Adds, plus the preseason prior, sum to Power (figures are rounded so the column adds up). Hover an Adds figure for its arithmetic.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerfAdds
1 vs Lamar FCS W 38–7 +34.1 -3.1 -0.5
2 at USC L 30–49 -23.1 +4.1 -0.3
3 vs UAB W 21–14 +11.0 -4.0 -0.3
4 at Charlotte W 34–7 +17.5 +9.5 +0.8
5 vs Arkansas State W 23–20 +11.4 -8.4 -0.7
6 at Louisiana Tech L 31–32 -6.0 +5.0 +0.1
7 vs Troy W 33–6 +12.7 +14.3 +1.2
8 at Southern Miss L 31–35 +9.9 -13.9 -1.3
10 vs South Alabama W 28–26 +9.1 -7.1 -0.6
11 at Louisiana-Monroe W 42–21 +18.2 +2.8 +0.4
Preseason prior (29% of the rating)-1.4
Power-2.6

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
12 vs Coastal Carolina +14.0 80%
13 at Georgia State +3.4 58%

Coaches

Mean added leaves out 1978–1980, the first seasons rated, which have no preseason prior to measure against.

CoachYearsRecordMean added
Augie Tammariello1978–19797-15–
Sam Robertson1980–198529-34-2-4.7
Nelson Stokley1986–199862-80-1-4.4
Jerry Baldwin1999–20016-27-7.6
Rickey Bustle2002–201041-65-4.8
Mark Hudspeth2011–201751-38-2.7
Billy Napier2018–202140-12+5.9
Michael Desormeaux2022–202635-28-1.3

Season by season

Best finish: #23 in 2019. 48 seasons rated. The two columns' numbers are not comparable; the rank within each is. Season links open that year's game log.

25 1 150 2003 (MRI Classic): #98 of 117 (4-8)2004 (MRI Classic): #83 of 117 (4-7)2005 (MRI Classic): #80 of 119 (6-5)2006 (MRI Classic): #85 of 119 (6-6)2007 (MRI Classic): #107 of 120 (3-9)2008 (MRI Classic): #78 of 120 (6-6)2009 (MRI Classic): #88 of 120 (6-6)2010 (MRI Classic): #113 of 120 (3-9)2011 (MRI Classic): #57 of 120 (9-4)2012 (MRI Classic): #54 of 124 (9-4)2013 (MRI Classic): #64 of 126 (9-4)2014 (MRI Classic): #62 of 128 (9-4)2015 (MRI Classic): #104 of 128 (4-8)2016 (MRI Classic): #75 of 128 (6-7)2017 (MRI Classic): #117 of 130 (5-7)2018 (MRI Classic): #87 of 130 (7-7)2019 (MRI Classic): #23 of 130 (11-3)1978 (MRI 2.0): #117 of 138 (3-8)1979 (MRI 2.0): #109 of 138 (4-7)1980 (MRI 2.0): #88 of 138 (7-4)1981 (MRI 2.0): #115 of 136 (1-10)1982 (MRI 2.0): #81 of 105 (7-4)1983 (MRI 2.0): #87 of 105 (4-6)1984 (MRI 2.0): #76 of 106 (6-5)1985 (MRI 2.0): #95 of 106 (4-7)1986 (MRI 2.0): #79 of 105 (6-5)1987 (MRI 2.0): #78 of 104 (6-5)1988 (MRI 2.0): #62 of 104 (6-5)1989 (MRI 2.0): #67 of 106 (7-4)1990 (MRI 2.0): #74 of 107 (5-6)1991 (MRI 2.0): #89 of 107 (2-9)1992 (MRI 2.0): #102 of 107 (2-9)1993 (MRI 2.0): #85 of 106 (8-3)1994 (MRI 2.0): #88 of 107 (6-5)1995 (MRI 2.0): #76 of 108 (6-5)1996 (MRI 2.0): #80 of 111 (5-6)1997 (MRI 2.0): #109 of 112 (1-10)1998 (MRI 2.0): #111 of 112 (2-9)1999 (MRI 2.0): #112 of 114 (2-9)2000 (MRI 2.0): #114 of 116 (1-10)2001 (MRI 2.0): #113 of 117 (3-8)2002 (MRI 2.0): #110 of 117 (3-9)2003 (MRI 2.0): #109 of 117 (4-8)2004 (MRI 2.0): #103 of 117 (4-7)2005 (MRI 2.0): #98 of 119 (6-5)2006 (MRI 2.0): #105 of 119 (6-6)2007 (MRI 2.0): #115 of 119 (3-9)2008 (MRI 2.0): #95 of 120 (6-6)2009 (MRI 2.0): #104 of 120 (6-6)2010 (MRI 2.0): #113 of 120 (3-9)2011 (MRI 2.0): #89 of 120 (9-4)2012 (MRI 2.0): #63 of 124 (9-4)2013 (MRI 2.0): #70 of 125 (9-4)2014 (MRI 2.0): #78 of 128 (9-4)2015 (MRI 2.0): #104 of 128 (4-8)2016 (MRI 2.0): #102 of 128 (6-7)2017 (MRI 2.0): #121 of 130 (5-7)2018 (MRI 2.0): #99 of 130 (7-7)2019 (MRI 2.0): #42 of 130 (11-3)2020 (MRI 2.0): #31 of 128 (10-1)2021 (MRI 2.0): #47 of 130 (13-1)2022 (MRI 2.0): #75 of 131 (6-7)2023 (MRI 2.0): #86 of 133 (6-7)2024 (MRI 2.0): #72 of 134 (10-4)2025 (MRI 2.0): #105 of 136 (6-7) MRI 2.0Classic 1978 2025

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 150 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Two lines where both ratings cover a season - MRI 2.0 in red, Classic in grey. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRec MRI 2.0MRI Classic
2025 6–7 #105 of 136 · -11.82 –
2024 10–4 #72 of 134 · -2.16 –
2023 6–7 #86 of 133 · -4.92 –
2022 6–7 #75 of 131 · -2.42 –
2021 13–1 #47 of 130 · 6.14 –
2020 10–1 #31 of 128 · 8.56 –
2019 11–3 #42 of 130 · 6.60 #23 of 130 · 65.51
2018 7–7 #99 of 130 · -9.56 #87 of 130 · 9.62
2017 5–7 #121 of 130 · -19.32 #117 of 130 · -35.89
2016 6–7 #102 of 128 · -12.22 #75 of 128 · 12.01
2015 4–8 #104 of 128 · -15.05 #104 of 128 · -18.35
2014 9–4 #78 of 128 · -3.97 #62 of 128 · 25.56
2013 9–4 #70 of 125 · -2.68 #64 of 126 · 24.24
2012 9–4 #63 of 124 · -0.54 #54 of 124 · 33.54
2011 9–4 #89 of 120 · -8.63 #57 of 120 · 27.23
2010 3–9 #113 of 120 · -20.70 #113 of 120 · -39.28
2009 6–6 #104 of 120 · -14.17 #88 of 120 · -0.05
2008 6–6 #95 of 120 · -10.61 #78 of 120 · 10.87
2007 3–9 #115 of 119 · -19.04 #107 of 120 · -22.28
2006 6–6 #105 of 119 · -13.26 #85 of 119 · 0.96
2005 6–5 #98 of 119 · -13.65 #80 of 119 · 15.13
2004 4–7 #103 of 117 · -16.48 #83 of 117 · 1.00
2003 4–8 #109 of 117 · -19.01 #98 of 117 · -17.81
2002 3–9 #110 of 117 · -20.04 –
2001 3–8 #113 of 117 · -24.78 –
2000 1–10 #114 of 116 · -29.71 –
1999 2–9 #112 of 114 · -25.45 –
1998 2–9 #111 of 112 · -26.72 –
1997 1–10 #109 of 112 · -28.39 –
1996 5–6 #80 of 111 · -8.82 –
1995 6–5 #76 of 108 · -7.40 –
1994 6–5 #88 of 107 · -12.51 –
1993 8–3 #85 of 106 · -9.60 –
1992 2–9 #102 of 107 · -20.98 –
1991 2–9 #89 of 107 · -13.21 –
1990 5–6 #74 of 107 · -5.99 –
1989 7–4 #67 of 106 · -5.39 –
1988 6–5 #62 of 104 · -4.04 –
1987 6–5 #78 of 104 · -9.53 –
1986 6–5 #79 of 105 · -9.01 –
1985 4–7 #95 of 106 · -15.69 –
1984 6–5 #76 of 106 · -6.32 –
1983 4–6 #87 of 105 · -10.28 –
1982 7–4 #81 of 105 · -8.98 –
1981 1–10 #115 of 136 · -9.88 –
1980 7–4 #88 of 138 · -4.10 –
1979 4–7 #109 of 138 · -8.00 –
1978 3–8 #117 of 138 · -11.58 –