The MRI
2026 · Week 11

Arizona

Big 12 · 7–2 · 4–2 in conference · MRI Classic #22

Power+12.4#27 of 138
Résumé+2.23#28 · wins above average
Playoff chance5.0%#26 most likely · +0.1 pts this week
Trendrating by week

Who to root for this week

2 games · top: Oklahoma State over Texas Tech, +1.2 pts playoff odds

The games this week that move its playoff odds most, and the side to cheer. Other teams’ games only; its own game is in the schedule below. How these are worked out.

Best winTCU (29–28)
Worst lossTexas Tech (26–34)
Schedule faced-3.2 avg opponent
Schedule ahead+7.3 avg opponent
HeismanNoah Fifita · 2.1% to win
Roster talent#52 of 127 · worth +0.8, rated +12.4: beating it
Returning production65% of last year's · #33 of 128
Home field+4.1 pts · 10th of 131

How this rating is built

Power = w × (average margin counted + average opponent rating) + (1 − w) × preseason prior, where w = games ÷ (games + 4). After 9 games, w is 69%, so the preseason prior is 31% of this rating. Every game played shrinks that share.

PartValueWeightAdds
Margin counted+16.2 avg× 69%+11.2
Opponents faced-3.2 avg× 69%-2.2
Preseason prior+11.0× 31%+3.4
Power+12.4

This explains how the model reached the number. The opponent ratings come out of the same fitted model, so it is not independent proof that the rating is right.

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the result against expectation. Adds is a different question: how many points of Power the game contributes, counting its margin and the strength of the opponent together. A game can beat expectation and still add little, or the reverse. Adds, plus the preseason prior, sum to Power (figures are rounded so the column adds up). Hover an Adds figure for its arithmetic.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerfAdds
1 vs Northern Arizona FCS W 35–7 +49.1 -21.1 -0.2
2 at BYU L 17–28 -5.4 -5.6 +0.2
3 vs Northern Illinois W 42–17 +40.5 -15.5 +0.2
4 at Washington State W 34–24 +17.4 -7.4 +0.6
5 vs Cincinnati W 34–7 +15.0 +12.0 +2.2
6 at West Virginia W 52–31 +10.2 +10.8 +2.2
8 vs Iowa State W 39–3 +14.0 +22.0 +2.9
9 at Texas Tech L 26–34 -4.8 -3.2 +0.5
10 vs TCU W 29–28 +9.2 -8.2 +0.4
Preseason prior (31% of the rating)+3.4
Power+12.4

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
11 vs Utah -5.3 38%
12 at Kansas State +8.5 70%
13 vs Arizona State +15.0 82%

Coaches

Mean added leaves out 1978–1980, the first seasons rated, which have no preseason prior to measure against.

CoachYearsRecordMean added
Tony Mason1978–197911-11-1–
Larry Smith1980–198648-28-3+4.8
Dick Tomey1987–200095-64-4+2.5
John Mackovic2001–200310-18-6.4
Mike Stoops2004–201141-50+2.4
Rich Rodriguez2012–201743-35+1.9
Kevin Sumlin2018–20209-20-5.6
Jedd Fisch2021–202316-21+2.2
Brent Brennan2024–202620-14+1.1

Season by season

Best finish: #13 in 1998. 48 seasons rated. The two columns' numbers are not comparable; the rank within each is. Season links open that year's game log.

25 1 150 2003 (MRI Classic): #102 of 117 (2-10)2004 (MRI Classic): #81 of 117 (3-8)2005 (MRI Classic): #88 of 119 (3-8)2006 (MRI Classic): #63 of 119 (6-6)2007 (MRI Classic): #55 of 120 (5-7)2008 (MRI Classic): #19 of 120 (8-5)2009 (MRI Classic): #37 of 120 (8-5)2010 (MRI Classic): #30 of 120 (7-6)2011 (MRI Classic): #84 of 120 (4-8)2012 (MRI Classic): #52 of 124 (8-5)2013 (MRI Classic): #32 of 126 (8-5)2014 (MRI Classic): #28 of 128 (10-4)2015 (MRI Classic): #73 of 128 (7-6)2016 (MRI Classic): #107 of 128 (3-9)2017 (MRI Classic): #61 of 130 (7-6)2018 (MRI Classic): #83 of 130 (5-7)2019 (MRI Classic): #105 of 130 (4-8)1978 (MRI 2.0): #51 of 138 (5-6)1979 (MRI 2.0): #49 of 138 (6-6)1980 (MRI 2.0): #77 of 138 (5-6)1981 (MRI 2.0): #56 of 136 (6-5)1982 (MRI 2.0): #29 of 105 (6-5)1983 (MRI 2.0): #25 of 105 (7-4)1984 (MRI 2.0): #29 of 106 (7-4)1985 (MRI 2.0): #24 of 106 (8-4)1986 (MRI 2.0): #14 of 105 (9-3)1987 (MRI 2.0): #26 of 104 (4-7)1988 (MRI 2.0): #23 of 104 (7-4)1989 (MRI 2.0): #20 of 106 (8-4)1990 (MRI 2.0): #37 of 107 (7-5)1991 (MRI 2.0): #51 of 107 (4-7)1992 (MRI 2.0): #16 of 107 (6-6)1993 (MRI 2.0): #16 of 106 (10-2)1994 (MRI 2.0): #20 of 107 (8-4)1995 (MRI 2.0): #36 of 108 (6-5)1996 (MRI 2.0): #34 of 111 (5-6)1997 (MRI 2.0): #28 of 112 (7-5)1998 (MRI 2.0): #13 of 112 (12-1)1999 (MRI 2.0): #40 of 114 (6-6)2000 (MRI 2.0): #30 of 116 (5-6)2001 (MRI 2.0): #62 of 117 (5-6)2002 (MRI 2.0): #71 of 117 (4-8)2003 (MRI 2.0): #93 of 117 (2-10)2004 (MRI 2.0): #77 of 117 (3-8)2005 (MRI 2.0): #64 of 119 (3-8)2006 (MRI 2.0): #48 of 119 (6-6)2007 (MRI 2.0): #41 of 119 (5-7)2008 (MRI 2.0): #18 of 120 (8-5)2009 (MRI 2.0): #30 of 120 (8-5)2010 (MRI 2.0): #31 of 120 (7-6)2011 (MRI 2.0): #56 of 120 (4-8)2012 (MRI 2.0): #34 of 124 (8-5)2013 (MRI 2.0): #26 of 125 (8-5)2014 (MRI 2.0): #25 of 128 (10-4)2015 (MRI 2.0): #51 of 128 (7-6)2016 (MRI 2.0): #87 of 128 (3-9)2017 (MRI 2.0): #53 of 130 (7-6)2018 (MRI 2.0): #67 of 130 (5-7)2019 (MRI 2.0): #91 of 130 (4-8)2020 (MRI 2.0): #105 of 128 (0-5)2021 (MRI 2.0): #109 of 130 (1-11)2022 (MRI 2.0): #78 of 131 (5-7)2023 (MRI 2.0): #18 of 133 (10-3)2024 (MRI 2.0): #82 of 134 (4-8)2025 (MRI 2.0): #27 of 136 (9-4) MRI 2.0Classic 1978 2025

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 150 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Two lines where both ratings cover a season - MRI 2.0 in red, Classic in grey. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRec MRI 2.0MRI Classic
2025 9–4 #27 of 136 · 11.17 –
2024 4–8 #82 of 134 · -3.28 –
2023 10–3 #18 of 133 · 13.95 –
2022 5–7 #78 of 131 · -2.98 –
2021 1–11 #109 of 130 · -11.86 –
2020 0–5 #105 of 128 · -11.50 –
2019 4–8 #91 of 130 · -6.39 #105 of 130 · -14.93
2018 5–7 #67 of 130 · 0.01 #83 of 130 · 10.69
2017 7–6 #53 of 130 · 3.35 #61 of 130 · 27.07
2016 3–9 #87 of 128 · -5.92 #107 of 128 · -23.13
2015 7–6 #51 of 128 · 4.91 #73 of 128 · 15.23
2014 10–4 #25 of 128 · 13.59 #28 of 128 · 54.19
2013 8–5 #26 of 125 · 12.54 #32 of 126 · 55.46
2012 8–5 #34 of 124 · 7.79 #52 of 124 · 35.67
2011 4–8 #56 of 120 · 1.80 #84 of 120 · 3.90
2010 7–6 #31 of 120 · 10.31 #30 of 120 · 55.61
2009 8–5 #30 of 120 · 9.30 #37 of 120 · 41.62
2008 8–5 #18 of 120 · 13.90 #19 of 120 · 59.00
2007 5–7 #41 of 119 · 6.44 #55 of 120 · 31.42
2006 6–6 #48 of 119 · 3.05 #63 of 119 · 21.52
2005 3–8 #64 of 119 · 0.10 #88 of 119 · 6.23
2004 3–8 #77 of 117 · -5.43 #81 of 117 · 2.31
2003 2–10 #93 of 117 · -11.07 #102 of 117 · -28.12
2002 4–8 #71 of 117 · -3.78 –
2001 5–6 #62 of 117 · 0.53 –
2000 5–6 #30 of 116 · 7.95 –
1999 6–6 #40 of 114 · 4.85 –
1998 12–1 #13 of 112 · 16.70 –
1997 7–5 #28 of 112 · 8.61 –
1996 5–6 #34 of 111 · 7.99 –
1995 6–5 #36 of 108 · 6.40 –
1994 8–4 #20 of 107 · 12.73 –
1993 10–2 #16 of 106 · 16.16 –
1992 6–6 #16 of 107 · 11.79 –
1991 4–7 #51 of 107 · 1.27 –
1990 7–5 #37 of 107 · 5.67 –
1989 8–4 #20 of 106 · 13.34 –
1988 7–4 #23 of 104 · 11.65 –
1987 4–7 #26 of 104 · 9.70 –
1986 9–3 #14 of 105 · 16.11 –
1985 8–4 #24 of 106 · 10.13 –
1984 7–4 #29 of 106 · 7.76 –
1983 7–4 #25 of 105 · 11.04 –
1982 6–5 #29 of 105 · 8.19 –
1981 6–5 #56 of 136 · 2.32 –
1980 5–6 #77 of 138 · -1.46 –
1979 6–6 #49 of 138 · 3.62 –
1978 5–6 #51 of 138 · 3.77 –