The MRI
2026 · Week 11

BYU

Big 12 · 7–2 · 4–2 in conference · MRI Classic #31

Power+14.8#20 of 138
Résumé+3.18#16 · wins above average
Playoff chance16%#20 most likely · +0.4 pts this week
Trendrating by week

Who to root for this week

5 games · top: Oklahoma State over Texas Tech, +2.9 pts playoff odds

The games this week that move its playoff odds most, and the side to cheer. Other teams’ games only; its own game is in the schedule below. How these are worked out.

Best winNotre Dame (28–24)
Worst lossUCF (31–39)
Schedule faced+3.3 avg opponent
Schedule ahead+4.2 avg opponent
Roster talent#57 of 127 · worth +0.3, rated +14.8: beating it
Returning production78% of last year's · #15 of 128
Home field+4.7 pts · 5th of 131

How this rating is built

Power = w × (average margin counted + average opponent rating) + (1 − w) × preseason prior, where w = games ÷ (games + 4). After 9 games, w is 69%, so the preseason prior is 31% of this rating. Every game played shrinks that share.

PartValueWeightAdds
Margin counted+11.5 avg× 69%+7.9
Opponents faced+3.3 avg× 69%+2.3
Preseason prior+14.8× 31%+4.6
Power+14.8

This explains how the model reached the number. The opponent ratings come out of the same fitted model, so it is not independent proof that the rating is right.

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the result against expectation. Adds is a different question: how many points of Power the game contributes, counting its margin and the strength of the opponent together. A game can beat expectation and still add little, or the reverse. Adds, plus the preseason prior, sum to Power (figures are rounded so the column adds up). Hover an Adds figure for its arithmetic.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerfAdds
1 vs Utah Tech FCS W 63–7 +51.5 +4.5 +1.2
2 vs Arizona W 28–17 +5.4 +5.6 +1.8
3 at Colorado State W 41–23 +25.0 -7.0 +1.0
5 at TCU W 17–10 +5.5 +1.5 +1.4
6 vs Iowa State W 24–10 +16.4 -2.4 +1.3
7 vs Notre Dame W 28–24 -11.8 +15.8 +2.5
8 at UCF L 31–39 +10.9 -18.9 -0.5
9 vs Arizona State W 27–20 +17.4 -10.4 +0.5
10 at Utah L 20–28 -8.9 +0.9 +1.0
Preseason prior (31% of the rating)+4.6
Power+14.8

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
11 vs Baylor +6.6 66%
12 at Kansas +10.8 74%
13 vs Cincinnati +17.4 85%

Coaches

Mean added leaves out 1978–1980, the first seasons rated, which have no preseason prior to measure against.

CoachYearsRecordMean added
LaVell Edwards1978–2000214-77-2+2.1
Gary Crowton2001–200426-23-0.7
Bronco Mendenhall2005–201599-43+3.5
Kalani Sitake2016–202691-47+4.3

Season by season

Best finish: #3 in 1984. 48 seasons rated. The two columns' numbers are not comparable; the rank within each is. Season links open that year's game log.

25 1 150 2003 (MRI Classic): #76 of 117 (4-8)2004 (MRI Classic): #63 of 117 (5-6)2005 (MRI Classic): #58 of 119 (6-6)2006 (MRI Classic): #8 of 119 (11-2)2007 (MRI Classic): #16 of 120 (11-2)2008 (MRI Classic): #22 of 120 (10-3)2009 (MRI Classic): #14 of 120 (11-2)2010 (MRI Classic): #44 of 120 (7-6)2011 (MRI Classic): #34 of 120 (10-3)2012 (MRI Classic): #28 of 124 (8-5)2013 (MRI Classic): #31 of 126 (8-5)2014 (MRI Classic): #36 of 128 (8-5)2015 (MRI Classic): #36 of 128 (9-4)2016 (MRI Classic): #34 of 128 (9-4)2017 (MRI Classic): #104 of 130 (4-9)2018 (MRI Classic): #44 of 130 (7-6)2019 (MRI Classic): #55 of 130 (7-6)1978 (MRI 2.0): #26 of 138 (9-4)1979 (MRI 2.0): #5 of 138 (11-1)1980 (MRI 2.0): #5 of 138 (12-1)1981 (MRI 2.0): #15 of 136 (11-2)1982 (MRI 2.0): #24 of 105 (8-4)1983 (MRI 2.0): #6 of 105 (11-1)1984 (MRI 2.0): #3 of 106 (13-0)1985 (MRI 2.0): #8 of 106 (11-3)1986 (MRI 2.0): #27 of 105 (8-5)1987 (MRI 2.0): #40 of 104 (9-4)1988 (MRI 2.0): #31 of 104 (9-4)1989 (MRI 2.0): #24 of 106 (10-3)1990 (MRI 2.0): #19 of 107 (10-3)1991 (MRI 2.0): #20 of 107 (8-5)1992 (MRI 2.0): #20 of 107 (8-5)1993 (MRI 2.0): #43 of 106 (6-6)1994 (MRI 2.0): #35 of 107 (10-3)1995 (MRI 2.0): #44 of 108 (7-4)1996 (MRI 2.0): #18 of 111 (14-1)1997 (MRI 2.0): #55 of 112 (6-5)1998 (MRI 2.0): #46 of 112 (9-5)1999 (MRI 2.0): #36 of 114 (8-4)2000 (MRI 2.0): #57 of 116 (6-6)2001 (MRI 2.0): #35 of 117 (12-2)2002 (MRI 2.0): #74 of 117 (5-7)2003 (MRI 2.0): #75 of 117 (4-8)2004 (MRI 2.0): #60 of 117 (5-6)2005 (MRI 2.0): #50 of 119 (6-6)2006 (MRI 2.0): #11 of 119 (11-2)2007 (MRI 2.0): #15 of 119 (11-2)2008 (MRI 2.0): #26 of 120 (10-3)2009 (MRI 2.0): #20 of 120 (11-2)2010 (MRI 2.0): #47 of 120 (7-6)2011 (MRI 2.0): #41 of 120 (10-3)2012 (MRI 2.0): #25 of 124 (8-5)2013 (MRI 2.0): #24 of 125 (8-5)2014 (MRI 2.0): #39 of 128 (8-5)2015 (MRI 2.0): #30 of 128 (9-4)2016 (MRI 2.0): #29 of 128 (9-4)2017 (MRI 2.0): #91 of 130 (4-9)2018 (MRI 2.0): #60 of 130 (7-6)2019 (MRI 2.0): #62 of 130 (7-6)2020 (MRI 2.0): #11 of 128 (11-1)2021 (MRI 2.0): #37 of 130 (10-3)2022 (MRI 2.0): #63 of 131 (8-5)2023 (MRI 2.0): #74 of 133 (5-7)2024 (MRI 2.0): #24 of 134 (11-2)2025 (MRI 2.0): #18 of 136 (12-2) MRI 2.0Classic 1978 2025

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 150 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Two lines where both ratings cover a season - MRI 2.0 in red, Classic in grey. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRec MRI 2.0MRI Classic
2025 12–2 #18 of 136 · 15.48 –
2024 11–2 #24 of 134 · 12.33 –
2023 5–7 #74 of 133 · -2.23 –
2022 8–5 #63 of 131 · 2.02 –
2021 10–3 #37 of 130 · 9.17 –
2020 11–1 #11 of 128 · 19.23 –
2019 7–6 #62 of 130 · 0.18 #55 of 130 · 23.25
2018 7–6 #60 of 130 · 1.92 #44 of 130 · 36.81
2017 4–9 #91 of 130 · -7.05 #104 of 130 · -15.07
2016 9–4 #29 of 128 · 9.81 #34 of 128 · 47.15
2015 9–4 #30 of 128 · 10.58 #36 of 128 · 50.50
2014 8–5 #39 of 128 · 7.86 #36 of 128 · 43.05
2013 8–5 #24 of 125 · 13.24 #31 of 126 · 55.61
2012 8–5 #25 of 124 · 11.57 #28 of 124 · 54.88
2011 10–3 #41 of 120 · 5.58 #34 of 120 · 46.10
2010 7–6 #47 of 120 · 4.18 #44 of 120 · 35.43
2009 11–2 #20 of 120 · 11.85 #14 of 120 · 65.27
2008 10–3 #26 of 120 · 9.15 #22 of 120 · 56.02
2007 11–2 #15 of 119 · 13.60 #16 of 120 · 71.24
2006 11–2 #11 of 119 · 17.09 #8 of 119 · 96.78
2005 6–6 #50 of 119 · 3.16 #58 of 119 · 29.47
2004 5–6 #60 of 117 · 0.48 #63 of 117 · 25.24
2003 4–8 #75 of 117 · -5.35 #76 of 117 · 9.94
2002 5–7 #74 of 117 · -4.16 –
2001 12–2 #35 of 117 · 8.59 –
2000 6–6 #57 of 116 · 1.86 –
1999 8–4 #36 of 114 · 7.47 –
1998 9–5 #46 of 112 · 3.83 –
1997 6–5 #55 of 112 · 1.38 –
1996 14–1 #18 of 111 · 14.78 –
1995 7–4 #44 of 108 · 4.78 –
1994 10–3 #35 of 107 · 5.96 –
1993 6–6 #43 of 106 · 2.98 –
1992 8–5 #20 of 107 · 9.68 –
1991 8–5 #20 of 107 · 12.35 –
1990 10–3 #19 of 107 · 14.74 –
1989 10–3 #24 of 106 · 11.60 –
1988 9–4 #31 of 104 · 7.49 –
1987 9–4 #40 of 104 · 4.01 –
1986 8–5 #27 of 105 · 8.61 –
1985 11–3 #8 of 106 · 18.44 –
1984 13–0 #3 of 106 · 17.22 –
1983 11–1 #6 of 105 · 17.89 –
1982 8–4 #24 of 105 · 11.47 –
1981 11–2 #15 of 136 · 17.23 –
1980 12–1 #5 of 138 · 24.72 –
1979 11–1 #5 of 138 · 21.62 –
1978 9–4 #26 of 138 · 8.99 –