The MRI
2026 · Week 11

Colorado

Big 12 · 3–6 · 1–5 in conference · MRI Classic #116

Power-5.4#84 of 138
Résumé-0.34#110 · wins above average
Playoff chance<0.1%out of the picture
Trendrating by week

Who to root for this week

Nothing this weekend moves the needle.

Nothing this weekend moves the needle.

Best winKansas State (27–24)
Worst lossArizona State (10–20)
Schedule faced+2.8 avg opponent
Schedule ahead+4.6 avg opponent
Roster talent#38 of 127 · worth +2.5, rated -5.4: short of it
Returning production14% of last year's · #110 of 128 · counted against its preseason rating
Home field+5.4 pts · 2nd of 131

How this rating is built

Power = w × (average margin counted + average opponent rating) + (1 − w) × preseason prior, where w = games ÷ (games + 4). After 9 games, w is 69%, so the preseason prior is 31% of this rating. Every game played shrinks that share.

PartValueWeightAdds
Margin counted-9.8 avg× 69%-6.8
Opponents faced+2.8 avg× 69%+1.9
Preseason prior-1.7× 31%-0.5
Power-5.4

This explains how the model reached the number. The opponent ratings come out of the same fitted model, so it is not independent proof that the rating is right.

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the result against expectation. Adds is a different question: how many points of Power the game contributes, counting its margin and the strength of the opponent together. A game can beat expectation and still add little, or the reverse. Adds, plus the preseason prior, sum to Power (figures are rounded so the column adds up). Hover an Adds figure for its arithmetic.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerfAdds
1 at Georgia Tech W 14–13 -1.6 +2.6 -0.2
2 vs Weber State FCS W 52–21 +31.3 -0.3 -0.2
3 at Northwestern L 7–41 -20.5 -13.5 -1.7
4 at Baylor L 13–23 -19.6 +9.6 +0.0
5 vs Texas Tech L 7–29 -16.6 -5.4 -1.2
7 vs Utah L 24–27 -23.1 +20.1 +1.1
8 at Oklahoma State L 24–57 -15.5 -17.5 -2.1
9 vs Kansas State W 27–24 -3.3 +6.3 +0.2
10 at Arizona State L 10–20 -8.8 -1.2 -0.8
Preseason prior (31% of the rating)-0.5
Power-5.4

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
11 vs Houston -14.8 18%
12 at Cincinnati -8.9 30%
13 vs UCF -3.3 42%

Coaches

Mean added leaves out 1978–1980, the first seasons rated, which have no preseason prior to measure against.

CoachYearsRecordMean added
Bill Mallory19786-5–
Chuck Fairbanks1979–19817-26+2.4
Bill McCartney1982–199493-55-5+4.4
Rick Neuheisel1995–199833-14+2.7
Gary Barnett1999–200549-38+2.0
Dan Hawkins2006–201019-39-2.2
Jon Embree2011–20124-21-10.6
Mike MacIntyre2013–201830-44+1.6
Mel Tucker20195-7-3.2
Karl Dorrell2020–20228-15-5.3
Deion Sanders2023–202619-27+2.0

Season by season

Best finish: #5 in 1995. 48 seasons rated. The two columns' numbers are not comparable; the rank within each is. Season links open that year's game log.

25 1 150 2003 (MRI Classic): #79 of 117 (5-7)2004 (MRI Classic): #56 of 117 (8-5)2005 (MRI Classic): #37 of 119 (7-6)2006 (MRI Classic): #92 of 119 (2-10)2007 (MRI Classic): #66 of 120 (6-7)2008 (MRI Classic): #87 of 120 (5-7)2009 (MRI Classic): #91 of 120 (3-9)2010 (MRI Classic): #79 of 120 (5-7)2011 (MRI Classic): #109 of 120 (3-10)2012 (MRI Classic): #121 of 124 (1-11)2013 (MRI Classic): #106 of 126 (4-8)2014 (MRI Classic): #94 of 128 (2-10)2015 (MRI Classic): #93 of 128 (4-9)2016 (MRI Classic): #19 of 128 (10-4)2017 (MRI Classic): #90 of 130 (5-7)2018 (MRI Classic): #88 of 130 (5-7)2019 (MRI Classic): #92 of 130 (5-7)1978 (MRI 2.0): #76 of 138 (6-5)1979 (MRI 2.0): #95 of 138 (3-8)1980 (MRI 2.0): #126 of 138 (1-10)1981 (MRI 2.0): #107 of 136 (3-8)1982 (MRI 2.0): #86 of 105 (2-9)1983 (MRI 2.0): #74 of 105 (4-7)1984 (MRI 2.0): #88 of 106 (1-10)1985 (MRI 2.0): #38 of 106 (7-5)1986 (MRI 2.0): #31 of 105 (6-6)1987 (MRI 2.0): #28 of 104 (7-4)1988 (MRI 2.0): #25 of 104 (8-4)1989 (MRI 2.0): #6 of 106 (11-1)1990 (MRI 2.0): #5 of 107 (11-2)1991 (MRI 2.0): #12 of 107 (8-4)1992 (MRI 2.0): #13 of 107 (9-3)1993 (MRI 2.0): #13 of 106 (8-4)1994 (MRI 2.0): #5 of 107 (11-1)1995 (MRI 2.0): #5 of 108 (10-2)1996 (MRI 2.0): #7 of 111 (10-2)1997 (MRI 2.0): #22 of 112 (5-6)1998 (MRI 2.0): #32 of 112 (8-4)1999 (MRI 2.0): #23 of 114 (7-5)2000 (MRI 2.0): #32 of 116 (3-8)2001 (MRI 2.0): #12 of 117 (10-3)2002 (MRI 2.0): #18 of 117 (9-5)2003 (MRI 2.0): #51 of 117 (5-7)2004 (MRI 2.0): #50 of 117 (8-5)2005 (MRI 2.0): #39 of 119 (7-6)2006 (MRI 2.0): #68 of 119 (2-10)2007 (MRI 2.0): #60 of 119 (6-7)2008 (MRI 2.0): #76 of 120 (5-7)2009 (MRI 2.0): #80 of 120 (3-9)2010 (MRI 2.0): #70 of 120 (5-7)2011 (MRI 2.0): #93 of 120 (3-10)2012 (MRI 2.0): #117 of 124 (1-11)2013 (MRI 2.0): #98 of 125 (4-8)2014 (MRI 2.0): #84 of 128 (2-10)2015 (MRI 2.0): #83 of 128 (4-9)2016 (MRI 2.0): #23 of 128 (10-4)2017 (MRI 2.0): #65 of 130 (5-7)2018 (MRI 2.0): #71 of 130 (5-7)2019 (MRI 2.0): #80 of 130 (5-7)2020 (MRI 2.0): #75 of 128 (4-2)2021 (MRI 2.0): #87 of 130 (4-8)2022 (MRI 2.0): #116 of 131 (1-11)2023 (MRI 2.0): #76 of 133 (4-8)2024 (MRI 2.0): #28 of 134 (9-4)2025 (MRI 2.0): #75 of 136 (3-9) MRI 2.0Classic 1978 2025

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 150 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Two lines where both ratings cover a season - MRI 2.0 in red, Classic in grey. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRec MRI 2.0MRI Classic
2025 3–9 #75 of 136 · -2.05 –
2024 9–4 #28 of 134 · 11.09 –
2023 4–8 #76 of 133 · -2.37 –
2022 1–11 #116 of 131 · -14.77 –
2021 4–8 #87 of 130 · -3.40 –
2020 4–2 #75 of 128 · -1.32 –
2019 5–7 #80 of 130 · -3.41 #92 of 130 · -0.81
2018 5–7 #71 of 130 · -0.73 #88 of 130 · 5.96
2017 5–7 #65 of 130 · 0.95 #90 of 130 · 3.96
2016 10–4 #23 of 128 · 11.60 #19 of 128 · 60.90
2015 4–9 #83 of 128 · -3.58 #93 of 128 · -2.35
2014 2–10 #84 of 128 · -6.59 #94 of 128 · -6.01
2013 4–8 #98 of 125 · -10.75 #106 of 126 · -22.95
2012 1–11 #117 of 124 · -19.88 #121 of 124 · -63.57
2011 3–10 #93 of 120 · -9.50 #109 of 120 · -36.88
2010 5–7 #70 of 120 · -2.94 #79 of 120 · 6.59
2009 3–9 #80 of 120 · -5.22 #91 of 120 · -3.46
2008 5–7 #76 of 120 · -4.28 #87 of 120 · -0.61
2007 6–7 #60 of 119 · 0.72 #66 of 120 · 22.44
2006 2–10 #68 of 119 · -2.59 #92 of 119 · -2.42
2005 7–6 #39 of 119 · 6.48 #37 of 119 · 44.95
2004 8–5 #50 of 117 · 3.17 #56 of 117 · 31.05
2003 5–7 #51 of 117 · 3.19 #79 of 117 · 6.56
2002 9–5 #18 of 117 · 13.62 –
2001 10–3 #12 of 117 · 14.38 –
2000 3–8 #32 of 116 · 7.57 –
1999 7–5 #23 of 114 · 10.90 –
1998 8–4 #32 of 112 · 9.27 –
1997 5–6 #22 of 112 · 12.82 –
1996 10–2 #7 of 111 · 22.70 –
1995 10–2 #5 of 108 · 22.77 –
1994 11–1 #5 of 107 · 21.82 –
1993 8–4 #13 of 106 · 16.62 –
1992 9–3 #13 of 107 · 14.46 –
1991 8–4 #12 of 107 · 17.21 –
1990 11–2 #5 of 107 · 21.84 –
1989 11–1 #6 of 106 · 24.48 –
1988 8–4 #25 of 104 · 10.87 –
1987 7–4 #28 of 104 · 8.86 –
1986 6–6 #31 of 105 · 7.41 –
1985 7–5 #38 of 106 · 4.43 –
1984 1–10 #88 of 106 · -9.95 –
1983 4–7 #74 of 105 · -6.04 –
1982 2–9 #86 of 105 · -11.35 –
1981 3–8 #107 of 136 · -8.45 –
1980 1–10 #126 of 138 · -15.24 –
1979 3–8 #95 of 138 · -5.35 –
1978 6–5 #76 of 138 · -0.43 –