The MRI
2026 · Week 2
MRI Champion · 1 football title 2003

Oklahoma

SEC · 1–1 · MRI Classic #53

Power+16.8#20 of 138
Résumé-0.07#98 · wins above average
Movement-1down from #19 last week
Best winUTEP (51–0)
Worst lossMichigan (10–17)
Schedule faced-4.6 avg opponent
Schedule ahead+14.5 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 vs UTEP W 51–0 +42.9 +8.1
2 at Michigan L 10–17 +0.0 -7.0

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
3 vs New Mexico +19.6 88%
4 at Georgia -13.0 22%
6 N Texas -7.7 32%
7 vs Kentucky +20.8 90%
8 at Mississippi State +2.2 55%
9 vs South Carolina +10.7 74%
10 at Florida +1.6 54%
11 vs Ole Miss +1.0 52%

Season by season

Best finish: #1 in 2003. 23 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 50 2003: #1 of 117 (12-2)2004: #4 of 117 (12-1)2005: #19 of 119 (8-4)2006: #17 of 119 (11-3)2007: #3 of 120 (11-3)2008: #3 of 120 (12-2)2009: #11 of 120 (8-5)2010: #6 of 120 (12-2)2011: #5 of 120 (10-3)2012: #18 of 124 (10-3)2013: #13 of 126 (11-2)2014: #29 of 128 (8-5)2015: #3 of 128 (11-2)2016: #8 of 128 (11-2)2017: #8 of 130 (12-1)2018: #7 of 130 (12-2)2019: #16 of 130 (12-2)2020: #4 of 128 (9-2)2021: #8 of 130 (11-2)2022: #21 of 131 (6-7)2023: #10 of 133 (10-3)2024: #29 of 134 (6-7)2025: #19 of 136 (10-3) 2003 2025

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 50 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025 19 of 136 10–3 16.61 Power
2024 29 of 134 6–7 11.42 Power
2023 10 of 133 10–3 21.09 Power
2022 21 of 131 6–7 12.81 Power
2021 8 of 130 11–2 18.64 Power
2020 4 of 128 9–2 25.05 Power
2019 16 of 130 12–2 72.22 MRI
2018 7 of 130 12–2 82.95 MRI
2017 8 of 130 12–1 96.63 MRI
2016 8 of 128 11–2 79.08 MRI
2015 3 of 128 11–2 99.15 MRI
2014 29 of 128 8–5 53.30 MRI
2013 13 of 126 11–2 77.35 MRI
2012 18 of 124 10–3 64.46 MRI
2011 5 of 120 10–3 106.58 MRI
2010 6 of 120 12–2 102.17 MRI
2009 11 of 120 8–5 70.34 MRI
2008 3 of 120 12–2 126.07 MRI
2007 3 of 120 11–3 105.78 MRI
2006 17 of 119 11–3 76.16 MRI
2005 19 of 119 8–4 65.30 MRI
2004 4 of 117 12–1 120.90 MRI
2003 1 of 117 12–2 143.50 MRI