The MRI
2026 · Week 11

UTEP

Mountain West · 1–8 · 0–5 in conference · MRI Classic #135

Power-25.7#138 of 138
Résumé-4.20#230 · wins above average
Playoff chance<0.1%out of the picture
Trendrating by week

Who to root for this week

Nothing this weekend moves the needle.

Nothing this weekend moves the needle.

Best winTexas Southern (51–10)
Worst lossNevada (13–30)
Schedule faced-6.7 avg opponent
Schedule ahead-14.1 avg opponent
Roster talent#98 of 127 · worth -5.2, rated -25.7: short of it
Returning production0% of last year's · #125 of 128 · counted against its preseason rating
Home field+4.5 pts · 8th of 131

How this rating is built

Power = w × (average margin counted + average opponent rating) + (1 − w) × preseason prior, where w = games ÷ (games + 4). After 9 games, w is 69%, so the preseason prior is 31% of this rating. Every game played shrinks that share.

PartValueWeightAdds
Margin counted-21.7 avg× 69%-15.1
Opponents faced-6.7 avg× 69%-4.6
Preseason prior-19.5× 31%-6.0
Power-25.7

This explains how the model reached the number. The opponent ratings come out of the same fitted model, so it is not independent proof that the rating is right.

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the result against expectation. Adds is a different question: how many points of Power the game contributes, counting its margin and the strength of the opponent together. A game can beat expectation and still add little, or the reverse. Adds, plus the preseason prior, sum to Power (figures are rounded so the column adds up). Hover an Adds figure for its arithmetic.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerfAdds
1 at Oklahoma L 0–51 -44.3 -6.7 -2.2
2 vs Texas Southern FCS W 51–10 +11.0 +30.0 -1.0
3 at Michigan L 17–52 -39.2 +4.2 -1.9
4 vs Oregon State L 7–33 -23.5 -2.5 -2.5
5 at New Mexico L 7–61 -34.4 -19.6 -3.0
6 vs Nevada L 13–30 -9.5 -7.5 -2.9
7 vs San Jose State L 11–24 -10.0 -3.0 -2.5
9 at North Dakota State L 7–31 -25.6 +1.6 -2.3
10 vs Hawaii L 14–17 -11.0 +8.0 -1.4
Preseason prior (31% of the rating)-6.0
Power-25.7

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
11 vs Wyoming -9.3 29%
12 at Air Force -24.7 7%
13 at Northern Illinois -3.6 41%

Coaches

Mean added leaves out 1978–1980, the first seasons rated, which have no preseason prior to measure against.

CoachYearsRecordMean added
Bill Michael1978–19814-33-10.9
Bill Yung1982–19857-39-4.3
Bob Stull1986–198821-15+4.1
David Lee1989–199311-41-1-7.3
Charlie Bailey1994–199919-48-1-3.8
Gary Nord2000–200314-34-8.5
Mike Price2004–201248-61-1.7
Sean Kugler2013–201718-36-8.9
Mike Price20170-7-12.3
Dana Dimel2018–202320-49-5.6
Scotty Walden2024–20266-27-6.0

Season by season

Best finish: #29 in 2004. 48 seasons rated. The two columns' numbers are not comparable; the rank within each is. Season links open that year's game log.

25 1 150 2003 (MRI Classic): #116 of 117 (2-11)2004 (MRI Classic): #29 of 117 (8-4)2005 (MRI Classic): #67 of 119 (8-4)2006 (MRI Classic): #98 of 119 (5-7)2007 (MRI Classic): #98 of 120 (4-8)2008 (MRI Classic): #79 of 120 (5-7)2009 (MRI Classic): #86 of 120 (4-8)2010 (MRI Classic): #93 of 120 (6-7)2011 (MRI Classic): #96 of 120 (5-7)2012 (MRI Classic): #98 of 124 (3-9)2013 (MRI Classic): #114 of 126 (2-10)2014 (MRI Classic): #69 of 128 (7-6)2015 (MRI Classic): #116 of 128 (5-7)2016 (MRI Classic): #117 of 128 (4-8)2017 (MRI Classic): #129 of 130 (0-12)2018 (MRI Classic): #129 of 130 (1-11)2019 (MRI Classic): #128 of 130 (1-11)1978 (MRI 2.0): #137 of 138 (1-11)1979 (MRI 2.0): #132 of 138 (2-9)1980 (MRI 2.0): #134 of 138 (1-11)1981 (MRI 2.0): #133 of 136 (1-10)1982 (MRI 2.0): #103 of 105 (2-10)1983 (MRI 2.0): #100 of 105 (2-10)1984 (MRI 2.0): #101 of 106 (2-9)1985 (MRI 2.0): #98 of 106 (1-10)1986 (MRI 2.0): #82 of 105 (4-8)1987 (MRI 2.0): #57 of 104 (7-4)1988 (MRI 2.0): #39 of 104 (10-3)1989 (MRI 2.0): #88 of 106 (2-10)1990 (MRI 2.0): #92 of 107 (3-8)1991 (MRI 2.0): #76 of 107 (4-8)1992 (MRI 2.0): #95 of 107 (1-10)1993 (MRI 2.0): #99 of 106 (1-11)1994 (MRI 2.0): #94 of 107 (3-8)1995 (MRI 2.0): #103 of 108 (2-10)1996 (MRI 2.0): #102 of 111 (2-9)1997 (MRI 2.0): #102 of 112 (4-7)1998 (MRI 2.0): #91 of 112 (3-8)1999 (MRI 2.0): #88 of 114 (5-7)2000 (MRI 2.0): #62 of 116 (8-4)2001 (MRI 2.0): #104 of 117 (2-9)2002 (MRI 2.0): #114 of 117 (2-10)2003 (MRI 2.0): #116 of 117 (2-11)2004 (MRI 2.0): #69 of 117 (8-4)2005 (MRI 2.0): #72 of 119 (8-4)2006 (MRI 2.0): #92 of 119 (5-7)2007 (MRI 2.0): #89 of 119 (4-8)2008 (MRI 2.0): #88 of 120 (5-7)2009 (MRI 2.0): #90 of 120 (4-8)2010 (MRI 2.0): #94 of 120 (6-7)2011 (MRI 2.0): #98 of 120 (5-7)2012 (MRI 2.0): #99 of 124 (3-9)2013 (MRI 2.0): #117 of 125 (2-10)2014 (MRI 2.0): #100 of 128 (7-6)2015 (MRI 2.0): #118 of 128 (5-7)2016 (MRI 2.0): #124 of 128 (4-8)2017 (MRI 2.0): #130 of 130 (0-12)2018 (MRI 2.0): #130 of 130 (1-11)2019 (MRI 2.0): #128 of 130 (1-11)2020 (MRI 2.0): #123 of 128 (3-5)2021 (MRI 2.0): #105 of 130 (7-6)2022 (MRI 2.0): #110 of 131 (5-7)2023 (MRI 2.0): #119 of 133 (3-9)2024 (MRI 2.0): #128 of 134 (3-9)2025 (MRI 2.0): #128 of 136 (2-10) MRI 2.0Classic 1978 2025

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 150 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Two lines where both ratings cover a season - MRI 2.0 in red, Classic in grey. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRec MRI 2.0MRI Classic
2025 2–10 #128 of 136 · -19.04 –
2024 3–9 #128 of 134 · -21.86 –
2023 3–9 #119 of 133 · -15.81 –
2022 5–7 #110 of 131 · -12.27 –
2021 7–6 #105 of 130 · -10.93 –
2020 3–5 #123 of 128 · -23.57 –
2019 1–11 #128 of 130 · -31.99 #128 of 130 · -74.89
2018 1–11 #130 of 130 · -30.05 #129 of 130 · -74.21
2017 0–12 #130 of 130 · -29.71 #129 of 130 · -75.25
2016 4–8 #124 of 128 · -20.79 #117 of 128 · -32.86
2015 5–7 #118 of 128 · -20.45 #116 of 128 · -38.99
2014 7–6 #100 of 128 · -11.04 #69 of 128 · 20.40
2013 2–10 #117 of 125 · -24.18 #114 of 126 · -47.70
2012 3–9 #99 of 124 · -12.22 #98 of 124 · -14.68
2011 5–7 #98 of 120 · -10.81 #96 of 120 · -11.63
2010 6–7 #94 of 120 · -11.80 #93 of 120 · -7.75
2009 4–8 #90 of 120 · -9.49 #86 of 120 · 0.66
2008 5–7 #88 of 120 · -8.99 #79 of 120 · 9.07
2007 4–8 #89 of 119 · -10.58 #98 of 120 · -10.94
2006 5–7 #92 of 119 · -9.07 #98 of 119 · -8.65
2005 8–4 #72 of 119 · -3.26 #67 of 119 · 23.33
2004 8–4 #69 of 117 · -2.47 #29 of 117 · 55.79
2003 2–11 #116 of 117 · -26.79 #116 of 117 · -68.96
2002 2–10 #114 of 117 · -24.35 –
2001 2–9 #104 of 117 · -17.04 –
2000 8–4 #62 of 116 · 0.87 –
1999 5–7 #88 of 114 · -9.20 –
1998 3–8 #91 of 112 · -12.22 –
1997 4–7 #102 of 112 · -17.84 –
1996 2–9 #102 of 111 · -21.00 –
1995 2–10 #103 of 108 · -22.27 –
1994 3–8 #94 of 107 · -16.55 –
1993 1–11 #99 of 106 · -18.97 –
1992 1–10 #95 of 107 · -13.31 –
1991 4–8 #76 of 107 · -7.00 –
1990 3–8 #92 of 107 · -15.37 –
1989 2–10 #88 of 106 · -13.18 –
1988 10–3 #39 of 104 · 3.30 –
1987 7–4 #57 of 104 · -2.26 –
1986 4–8 #82 of 105 · -10.71 –
1985 1–10 #98 of 106 · -17.96 –
1984 2–9 #101 of 106 · -19.03 –
1983 2–10 #100 of 105 · -19.47 –
1982 2–10 #103 of 105 · -21.27 –
1981 1–10 #133 of 136 · -26.97 –
1980 1–11 #134 of 138 · -22.60 –
1979 2–9 #132 of 138 · -18.61 –
1978 1–11 #137 of 138 · -21.53 –