The MRI
2026 · Week 11

Texas A&M

SEC · 4–5 · 1–5 in conference · MRI Classic #71

Power+16.0#16 of 138
Résumé+0.50#57 · wins above average
Playoff chance0.2%#45 most likely
Trendrating by week

Who to root for this week

Nothing this weekend moves the needle.

Nothing this weekend moves the needle.

Best winArkansas (34–7)
Worst lossKentucky (21–31)
Schedule faced+5.3 avg opponent
Schedule ahead+21.6 avg opponent
Roster talent#7 of 127 · worth +13.2, rated +16.0: in line with it
Returning production73% of last year's · #18 of 128
Home field+3.1 pts · 46th of 131

How this rating is built

Power = w × (average margin counted + average opponent rating) + (1 − w) × preseason prior, where w = games ÷ (games + 4). After 9 games, w is 69%, so the preseason prior is 31% of this rating. Every game played shrinks that share.

PartValueWeightAdds
Margin counted+5.7 avg× 69%+4.0
Opponents faced+5.3 avg× 69%+3.7
Preseason prior+27.1× 31%+8.3
Power+16.0

This explains how the model reached the number. The opponent ratings come out of the same fitted model, so it is not independent proof that the rating is right.

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the result against expectation. Adds is a different question: how many points of Power the game contributes, counting its margin and the strength of the opponent together. A game can beat expectation and still add little, or the reverse. Adds, plus the preseason prior, sum to Power (figures are rounded so the column adds up). Hover an Adds figure for its arithmetic.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerfAdds
1 vs Missouri State W 50–0 +34.5 +15.5 +2.1
2 vs Arizona State W 48–20 +18.6 +9.4 +2.4
3 vs Kentucky L 21–31 +7.7 -17.7 -0.4
4 at LSU L 6–35 -10.4 -18.6 -0.6
5 vs Arkansas W 34–7 +17.8 +9.2 +2.3
6 at Missouri L 6–27 -1.9 -19.1 -0.6
7 vs The Citadel FCS W 41–0 +52.7 -11.7 +0.3
8 at Alabama L 20–31 -17.5 +6.5 +1.5
10 at South Carolina L 9–17 -3.9 -4.1 +0.7
Preseason prior (31% of the rating)+8.3
Power+16.0

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
11 vs Tennessee -2.2 45%
12 at Oklahoma -2.6 44%
13 vs Texas -8.9 29%

Coaches

Mean added leaves out 1978–1980, the first seasons rated, which have no preseason prior to measure against.

CoachYearsRecordMean added
Emory Bellard19784-2–
Tom Wilson1979–198117-17+7.6
Jackie Sherrill1982–198852-28-1+2.4
R.C. Slocum1989–2002123-47-2+4.4
Dennis Franchione2003–200732-29+0.7
Mike Sherman2008–201125-25+3.0
Kevin Sumlin2012–201751-26+3.4
Jimbo Fisher2018–202345-25+3.9
Mike Elko2024–202623-12+5.3

Season by season

Best finish: #3 in 2012. 48 seasons rated. The two columns' numbers are not comparable; the rank within each is. Season links open that year's game log.

25 1 150 2003 (MRI Classic): #89 of 117 (4-8)2004 (MRI Classic): #23 of 117 (7-5)2005 (MRI Classic): #68 of 119 (5-6)2006 (MRI Classic): #30 of 119 (9-4)2007 (MRI Classic): #52 of 120 (7-6)2008 (MRI Classic): #104 of 120 (4-8)2009 (MRI Classic): #69 of 120 (6-7)2010 (MRI Classic): #24 of 120 (9-4)2011 (MRI Classic): #26 of 120 (7-6)2012 (MRI Classic): #6 of 124 (11-2)2013 (MRI Classic): #27 of 126 (9-4)2014 (MRI Classic): #53 of 128 (8-5)2015 (MRI Classic): #49 of 128 (8-5)2016 (MRI Classic): #40 of 128 (8-5)2017 (MRI Classic): #64 of 130 (7-6)2018 (MRI Classic): #23 of 130 (9-4)2019 (MRI Classic): #37 of 130 (8-5)1978 (MRI 2.0): #32 of 138 (8-4)1979 (MRI 2.0): #17 of 138 (6-5)1980 (MRI 2.0): #47 of 138 (4-7)1981 (MRI 2.0): #29 of 136 (7-5)1982 (MRI 2.0): #54 of 105 (5-6)1983 (MRI 2.0): #44 of 105 (5-6)1984 (MRI 2.0): #54 of 106 (6-5)1985 (MRI 2.0): #19 of 106 (10-2)1986 (MRI 2.0): #17 of 105 (9-3)1987 (MRI 2.0): #14 of 104 (10-2)1988 (MRI 2.0): #27 of 104 (7-5)1989 (MRI 2.0): #14 of 106 (8-4)1990 (MRI 2.0): #13 of 107 (9-4)1991 (MRI 2.0): #7 of 107 (10-2)1992 (MRI 2.0): #10 of 107 (12-1)1993 (MRI 2.0): #5 of 106 (10-2)1994 (MRI 2.0): #10 of 107 (10-1)1995 (MRI 2.0): #13 of 108 (9-3)1996 (MRI 2.0): #28 of 111 (6-6)1997 (MRI 2.0): #21 of 112 (9-4)1998 (MRI 2.0): #12 of 112 (11-3)1999 (MRI 2.0): #15 of 114 (8-4)2000 (MRI 2.0): #15 of 116 (7-5)2001 (MRI 2.0): #33 of 117 (8-4)2002 (MRI 2.0): #33 of 117 (6-6)2003 (MRI 2.0): #71 of 117 (4-8)2004 (MRI 2.0): #30 of 117 (7-5)2005 (MRI 2.0): #46 of 119 (5-6)2006 (MRI 2.0): #35 of 119 (9-4)2007 (MRI 2.0): #42 of 119 (7-6)2008 (MRI 2.0): #83 of 120 (4-8)2009 (MRI 2.0): #57 of 120 (6-7)2010 (MRI 2.0): #22 of 120 (9-4)2011 (MRI 2.0): #13 of 120 (7-6)2012 (MRI 2.0): #3 of 124 (11-2)2013 (MRI 2.0): #16 of 125 (9-4)2014 (MRI 2.0): #24 of 128 (8-5)2015 (MRI 2.0): #27 of 128 (8-5)2016 (MRI 2.0): #22 of 128 (8-5)2017 (MRI 2.0): #40 of 130 (7-6)2018 (MRI 2.0): #15 of 130 (9-4)2019 (MRI 2.0): #19 of 130 (8-5)2020 (MRI 2.0): #7 of 128 (9-1)2021 (MRI 2.0): #12 of 130 (8-4)2022 (MRI 2.0): #32 of 131 (5-7)2023 (MRI 2.0): #20 of 133 (7-6)2024 (MRI 2.0): #18 of 134 (8-5)2025 (MRI 2.0): #8 of 136 (11-2) MRI 2.0Classic 1978 2025

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 150 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Two lines where both ratings cover a season - MRI 2.0 in red, Classic in grey. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRec MRI 2.0MRI Classic
2025 11–2 #8 of 136 · 21.25 –
2024 8–5 #18 of 134 · 14.84 –
2023 7–6 #20 of 133 · 13.53 –
2022 5–7 #32 of 131 · 9.05 –
2021 8–4 #12 of 130 · 16.88 –
2020 9–1 #7 of 128 · 20.70 –
2019 8–5 #19 of 130 · 13.43 #37 of 130 · 38.66
2018 9–4 #15 of 130 · 14.69 #23 of 130 · 59.49
2017 7–6 #40 of 130 · 6.65 #64 of 130 · 25.43
2016 8–5 #22 of 128 · 12.59 #40 of 128 · 43.24
2015 8–5 #27 of 128 · 11.76 #49 of 128 · 39.40
2014 8–5 #24 of 128 · 13.67 #53 of 128 · 34.17
2013 9–4 #16 of 125 · 18.95 #27 of 126 · 57.15
2012 11–2 #3 of 124 · 25.08 #6 of 124 · 84.03
2011 7–6 #13 of 120 · 14.92 #26 of 120 · 57.21
2010 9–4 #22 of 120 · 11.62 #24 of 120 · 59.63
2009 6–7 #57 of 120 · 1.43 #69 of 120 · 17.89
2008 4–8 #83 of 120 · -6.59 #104 of 120 · -22.44
2007 7–6 #42 of 119 · 5.96 #52 of 120 · 33.33
2006 9–4 #35 of 119 · 7.24 #30 of 119 · 53.41
2005 5–6 #46 of 119 · 4.22 #68 of 119 · 22.47
2004 7–5 #30 of 117 · 8.26 #23 of 117 · 67.74
2003 4–8 #71 of 117 · -4.31 #89 of 117 · -4.56
2002 6–6 #33 of 117 · 8.04 –
2001 8–4 #33 of 117 · 8.74 –
2000 7–5 #15 of 116 · 14.75 –
1999 8–4 #15 of 114 · 12.99 –
1998 11–3 #12 of 112 · 17.15 –
1997 9–4 #21 of 112 · 13.49 –
1996 6–6 #28 of 111 · 10.79 –
1995 9–3 #13 of 108 · 15.20 –
1994 10–1 #10 of 107 · 18.30 –
1993 10–2 #5 of 106 · 22.41 –
1992 12–1 #10 of 107 · 15.59 –
1991 10–2 #7 of 107 · 21.74 –
1990 9–4 #13 of 107 · 17.52 –
1989 8–4 #14 of 106 · 16.02 –
1988 7–5 #27 of 104 · 10.23 –
1987 10–2 #14 of 104 · 15.13 –
1986 9–3 #17 of 105 · 13.22 –
1985 10–2 #19 of 106 · 13.67 –
1984 6–5 #54 of 106 · 0.63 –
1983 5–6 #44 of 105 · 2.33 –
1982 5–6 #54 of 105 · -0.88 –
1981 7–5 #29 of 136 · 9.75 –
1980 4–7 #47 of 138 · 3.40 –
1979 6–5 #17 of 138 · 13.97 –
1978 8–4 #32 of 138 · 7.87 –