The MRI
2026 · Week 11

Vanderbilt

SEC · 4–5 · 1–5 in conference · MRI Classic #102

Power+2.5#55 of 138
Résumé+0.40#60 · wins above average
Playoff chance<0.1%out of the picture
Trendrating by week

Who to root for this week

Nothing this weekend moves the needle.

Nothing this weekend moves the needle.

Best winMississippi State (25–23)
Worst lossArkansas (21–31)
Schedule faced+5.2 avg opponent
Schedule ahead+22.0 avg opponent
Roster talent#41 of 127 · worth +2.3, rated +2.5: in line with it
Returning production35% of last year's · #74 of 128
Home field+2.2 pts · 123rd of 131

How this rating is built

Power = w × (average margin counted + average opponent rating) + (1 − w) × preseason prior, where w = games ÷ (games + 4). After 9 games, w is 69%, so the preseason prior is 31% of this rating. Every game played shrinks that share.

PartValueWeightAdds
Margin counted-7.7 avg× 69%-5.3
Opponents faced+5.2 avg× 69%+3.6
Preseason prior+13.4× 31%+4.2
Power+2.5

This explains how the model reached the number. The opponent ratings come out of the same fitted model, so it is not independent proof that the rating is right.

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the result against expectation. Adds is a different question: how many points of Power the game contributes, counting its margin and the strength of the opponent together. A game can beat expectation and still add little, or the reverse. Adds, plus the preseason prior, sum to Power (figures are rounded so the column adds up). Hover an Adds figure for its arithmetic.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerfAdds
1 vs Austin Peay FCS W 28–9 +39.2 -20.2 -0.3
2 vs Delaware W 35–26 +15.9 -6.9 -0.1
3 vs NC State W 35–31 +6.7 -2.7 +0.1
4 at Auburn L 15–21 -9.9 +3.9 +0.3
5 at Georgia L 14–38 -33.3 +9.3 +0.5
6 vs Ole Miss L 17–52 -16.0 -19.0 -1.5
7 vs Arkansas L 21–31 +4.3 -14.3 -1.2
8 at Kentucky L 17–34 -11.8 -5.2 -0.6
10 at Mississippi State W 25–23 -9.0 +11.0 +1.1
Preseason prior (31% of the rating)+4.2
Power+2.5

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
11 vs Alabama -25.0 6%
12 at Florida -14.7 19%
13 vs Tennessee -15.8 17%

Coaches

Mean added leaves out 1978–1980, the first seasons rated, which have no preseason prior to measure against.

CoachYearsRecordMean added
Fred Pancoast19782-9–
George MacIntyre1979–198525-52-1+0.9
Watson Brown1986–199010-45-3.9
Gerry DiNardo1991–199418-26+1.0
Ron Dowhower1995–19964-18-3.7
Woody Widenhofer1997–200115-40-2.6
Bobby Johnson2002–200929-66-1.0
Robbie Caldwell20102-10-7.9
James Franklin2011–201324-15+6.4
Derek Mason2014–202027-55-3.8
Clark Lea2021–202630-41+1.1

Season by season

Best finish: #14 in 2025. 48 seasons rated. The two columns' numbers are not comparable; the rank within each is. Season links open that year's game log.

25 1 150 2003 (MRI Classic): #95 of 117 (2-10)2004 (MRI Classic): #87 of 117 (2-9)2005 (MRI Classic): #75 of 119 (5-6)2006 (MRI Classic): #73 of 119 (4-8)2007 (MRI Classic): #68 of 120 (5-7)2008 (MRI Classic): #52 of 120 (7-6)2009 (MRI Classic): #103 of 120 (2-10)2010 (MRI Classic): #114 of 120 (2-10)2011 (MRI Classic): #46 of 120 (6-7)2012 (MRI Classic): #37 of 124 (9-4)2013 (MRI Classic): #49 of 126 (9-4)2014 (MRI Classic): #119 of 128 (3-9)2015 (MRI Classic): #88 of 128 (4-8)2016 (MRI Classic): #77 of 128 (6-7)2017 (MRI Classic): #97 of 130 (5-7)2018 (MRI Classic): #62 of 130 (6-7)2019 (MRI Classic): #123 of 130 (3-9)1978 (MRI 2.0): #136 of 138 (2-9)1979 (MRI 2.0): #134 of 138 (1-10)1980 (MRI 2.0): #127 of 138 (2-9)1981 (MRI 2.0): #84 of 136 (4-7)1982 (MRI 2.0): #39 of 105 (8-4)1983 (MRI 2.0): #51 of 105 (2-9)1984 (MRI 2.0): #43 of 106 (5-6)1985 (MRI 2.0): #73 of 106 (3-8)1986 (MRI 2.0): #83 of 105 (1-10)1987 (MRI 2.0): #60 of 104 (4-7)1988 (MRI 2.0): #65 of 104 (3-8)1989 (MRI 2.0): #73 of 106 (1-10)1990 (MRI 2.0): #96 of 107 (1-10)1991 (MRI 2.0): #71 of 107 (5-6)1992 (MRI 2.0): #63 of 107 (4-7)1993 (MRI 2.0): #70 of 106 (4-7)1994 (MRI 2.0): #68 of 107 (5-6)1995 (MRI 2.0): #79 of 108 (2-9)1996 (MRI 2.0): #75 of 111 (2-9)1997 (MRI 2.0): #76 of 112 (3-8)1998 (MRI 2.0): #93 of 112 (2-9)1999 (MRI 2.0): #71 of 114 (5-6)2000 (MRI 2.0): #80 of 116 (3-8)2001 (MRI 2.0): #86 of 117 (2-9)2002 (MRI 2.0): #88 of 117 (2-10)2003 (MRI 2.0): #85 of 117 (2-10)2004 (MRI 2.0): #84 of 117 (2-9)2005 (MRI 2.0): #70 of 119 (5-6)2006 (MRI 2.0): #64 of 119 (4-8)2007 (MRI 2.0): #62 of 119 (5-7)2008 (MRI 2.0): #49 of 120 (7-6)2009 (MRI 2.0): #77 of 120 (2-10)2010 (MRI 2.0): #92 of 120 (2-10)2011 (MRI 2.0): #48 of 120 (6-7)2012 (MRI 2.0): #29 of 124 (9-4)2013 (MRI 2.0): #38 of 125 (9-4)2014 (MRI 2.0): #89 of 128 (3-9)2015 (MRI 2.0): #81 of 128 (4-8)2016 (MRI 2.0): #62 of 128 (6-7)2017 (MRI 2.0): #79 of 130 (5-7)2018 (MRI 2.0): #54 of 130 (6-7)2019 (MRI 2.0): #100 of 130 (3-9)2020 (MRI 2.0): #115 of 128 (0-9)2021 (MRI 2.0): #115 of 130 (2-10)2022 (MRI 2.0): #85 of 131 (5-7)2023 (MRI 2.0): #101 of 133 (2-10)2024 (MRI 2.0): #49 of 134 (7-6)2025 (MRI 2.0): #14 of 136 (10-3) MRI 2.0Classic 1978 2025

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 150 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Two lines where both ratings cover a season - MRI 2.0 in red, Classic in grey. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRec MRI 2.0MRI Classic
2025 10–3 #14 of 136 · 18.26 –
2024 7–6 #49 of 134 · 5.01 –
2023 2–10 #101 of 133 · -8.29 –
2022 5–7 #85 of 131 · -4.71 –
2021 2–10 #115 of 130 · -15.57 –
2020 0–9 #115 of 128 · -16.48 –
2019 3–9 #100 of 130 · -9.52 #123 of 130 · -48.76
2018 6–7 #54 of 130 · 3.15 #62 of 130 · 24.43
2017 5–7 #79 of 130 · -2.86 #97 of 130 · -0.84
2016 6–7 #62 of 128 · 1.17 #77 of 128 · 10.32
2015 4–8 #81 of 128 · -3.41 #88 of 128 · 0.86
2014 3–9 #89 of 128 · -8.71 #119 of 128 · -37.36
2013 9–4 #38 of 125 · 8.23 #49 of 126 · 38.81
2012 9–4 #29 of 124 · 9.91 #37 of 124 · 47.05
2011 6–7 #48 of 120 · 4.01 #46 of 120 · 33.91
2010 2–10 #92 of 120 · -10.85 #114 of 120 · -44.80
2009 2–10 #77 of 120 · -4.21 #103 of 120 · -11.99
2008 7–6 #49 of 120 · 3.06 #52 of 120 · 31.89
2007 5–7 #62 of 119 · 0.37 #68 of 120 · 20.99
2006 4–8 #64 of 119 · -1.13 #73 of 119 · 8.94
2005 5–6 #70 of 119 · -3.05 #75 of 119 · 17.70
2004 2–9 #84 of 117 · -8.10 #87 of 117 · -1.60
2003 2–10 #85 of 117 · -9.34 #95 of 117 · -11.61
2002 2–10 #88 of 117 · -9.72 –
2001 2–9 #86 of 117 · -9.69 –
2000 3–8 #80 of 116 · -4.88 –
1999 5–6 #71 of 114 · -3.69 –
1998 2–9 #93 of 112 · -13.19 –
1997 3–8 #76 of 112 · -5.01 –
1996 2–9 #75 of 111 · -6.75 –
1995 2–9 #79 of 108 · -7.69 –
1994 5–6 #68 of 107 · -3.15 –
1993 4–7 #70 of 106 · -5.84 –
1992 4–7 #63 of 107 · -2.57 –
1991 5–6 #71 of 107 · -6.26 –
1990 1–10 #96 of 107 · -16.45 –
1989 1–10 #73 of 106 · -8.15 –
1988 3–8 #65 of 104 · -4.30 –
1987 4–7 #60 of 104 · -3.44 –
1986 1–10 #83 of 105 · -11.00 –
1985 3–8 #73 of 106 · -6.96 –
1984 5–6 #43 of 106 · 3.14 –
1983 2–9 #51 of 105 · -1.19 –
1982 8–4 #39 of 105 · 3.23 –
1981 4–7 #84 of 136 · -3.49 –
1980 2–9 #127 of 138 · -15.52 –
1979 1–10 #134 of 138 · -20.00 –
1978 2–9 #136 of 138 · -21.05 –