The MRI
2026 · Week 11

Auburn

SEC · 5–4 · 3–4 in conference · MRI Classic #69

Power+9.4#37 of 138
Résumé+2.49#26 · wins above average
Playoff chance0.2%#44 most likely
Trendrating by week

Who to root for this week

Nothing this weekend moves the needle.

Nothing this weekend moves the needle.

Best winGeorgia (27–24)
Worst lossFlorida (39–44)
Schedule faced+12.5 avg opponent
Schedule ahead+1.7 avg opponent
Roster talent#17 of 127 · worth +7.7, rated +9.4: in line with it
Returning production14% of last year's · #105 of 128 · counted against its preseason rating
Home field+3.0 pts · 54th of 131

How this rating is built

Power = w × (average margin counted + average opponent rating) + (1 − w) × preseason prior, where w = games ÷ (games + 4). After 9 games, w is 69%, so the preseason prior is 31% of this rating. Every game played shrinks that share.

PartValueWeightAdds
Margin counted-3.4 avg× 69%-2.3
Opponents faced+12.5 avg× 69%+8.6
Preseason prior+10.0× 31%+3.1
Power+9.4

This explains how the model reached the number. The opponent ratings come out of the same fitted model, so it is not independent proof that the rating is right.

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the result against expectation. Adds is a different question: how many points of Power the game contributes, counting its margin and the strength of the opponent together. A game can beat expectation and still add little, or the reverse. Adds, plus the preseason prior, sum to Power (figures are rounded so the column adds up). Hover an Adds figure for its arithmetic.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerfAdds
1 N Baylor W 17–16 -1.8 +2.8 +1.0
2 vs Southern Miss W 43–8 +27.9 +7.1 +1.5
3 vs Florida L 39–44 -1.8 -3.2 +0.4
4 vs Vanderbilt W 21–15 +9.9 -3.9 +0.6
5 at Tennessee L 14–24 -14.9 +4.9 +0.8
7 at Georgia W 27–24 -26.4 +29.4 +3.0
8 vs LSU L 17–38 -10.9 -10.1 -0.4
9 at Ole Miss L 15–45 -15.2 -14.8 -0.8
10 vs Arkansas W 26–23 +11.2 -8.2 +0.2
Preseason prior (31% of the rating)+3.1
Power+9.4

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
11 at Mississippi State -2.1 45%
12 vs Samford FCS +46.1 100%
13 at Alabama -24.1 7%

Coaches

Mean added leaves out 1978–1980, the first seasons rated, which have no preseason prior to measure against.

CoachYearsRecordMean added
Doug Barfield1978–198019-13-1–
Pat Dye1981–199299-39-4+4.0
Terry Bowden1993–199847-17-1+3.7
Tommy Tuberville1999–200885-40+3.0
Gene Chizik2009–201233-19+1.4
Gus Malzahn2013–202068-35+6.7
Bryan Harsin2021–20229-12-2.9
Hugh Freeze2023–202515-19+1.5
Alex Golesh20265-4+5.6

Season by season

Best finish: #2 in 1983. 48 seasons rated. The two columns' numbers are not comparable; the rank within each is. Season links open that year's game log.

25 1 150 2003 (MRI Classic): #30 of 117 (8-5)2004 (MRI Classic): #5 of 117 (13-0)2005 (MRI Classic): #16 of 119 (9-3)2006 (MRI Classic): #18 of 119 (11-2)2007 (MRI Classic): #35 of 120 (9-4)2008 (MRI Classic): #67 of 120 (5-7)2009 (MRI Classic): #41 of 120 (8-5)2010 (MRI Classic): #7 of 120 (14-0)2011 (MRI Classic): #66 of 120 (8-5)2012 (MRI Classic): #102 of 124 (3-9)2013 (MRI Classic): #12 of 126 (12-2)2014 (MRI Classic): #24 of 128 (8-5)2015 (MRI Classic): #57 of 128 (7-6)2016 (MRI Classic): #24 of 128 (8-5)2017 (MRI Classic): #10 of 130 (10-4)2018 (MRI Classic): #33 of 130 (8-5)2019 (MRI Classic): #27 of 130 (9-4)1978 (MRI 2.0): #50 of 138 (6-5)1979 (MRI 2.0): #26 of 138 (8-3)1980 (MRI 2.0): #37 of 138 (5-6)1981 (MRI 2.0): #33 of 136 (5-6)1982 (MRI 2.0): #26 of 105 (9-3)1983 (MRI 2.0): #2 of 105 (11-1)1984 (MRI 2.0): #7 of 106 (9-4)1985 (MRI 2.0): #11 of 106 (8-4)1986 (MRI 2.0): #7 of 105 (10-2)1987 (MRI 2.0): #6 of 104 (9-3)1988 (MRI 2.0): #8 of 104 (10-2)1989 (MRI 2.0): #10 of 106 (10-2)1990 (MRI 2.0): #23 of 107 (8-4)1991 (MRI 2.0): #34 of 107 (5-6)1992 (MRI 2.0): #43 of 107 (5-6)1993 (MRI 2.0): #21 of 106 (11-0)1994 (MRI 2.0): #14 of 107 (9-2)1995 (MRI 2.0): #17 of 108 (8-4)1996 (MRI 2.0): #27 of 111 (8-4)1997 (MRI 2.0): #19 of 112 (10-3)1998 (MRI 2.0): #43 of 112 (3-8)1999 (MRI 2.0): #43 of 114 (5-6)2000 (MRI 2.0): #28 of 116 (9-4)2001 (MRI 2.0): #51 of 117 (7-5)2002 (MRI 2.0): #20 of 117 (9-4)2003 (MRI 2.0): #24 of 117 (8-5)2004 (MRI 2.0): #7 of 117 (13-0)2005 (MRI 2.0): #10 of 119 (9-3)2006 (MRI 2.0): #15 of 119 (11-2)2007 (MRI 2.0): #18 of 119 (9-4)2008 (MRI 2.0): #47 of 120 (5-7)2009 (MRI 2.0): #32 of 120 (8-5)2010 (MRI 2.0): #8 of 120 (14-0)2011 (MRI 2.0): #38 of 120 (8-5)2012 (MRI 2.0): #69 of 124 (3-9)2013 (MRI 2.0): #17 of 125 (12-2)2014 (MRI 2.0): #10 of 128 (8-5)2015 (MRI 2.0): #33 of 128 (7-6)2016 (MRI 2.0): #12 of 128 (8-5)2017 (MRI 2.0): #9 of 130 (10-4)2018 (MRI 2.0): #13 of 130 (8-5)2019 (MRI 2.0): #11 of 130 (9-4)2020 (MRI 2.0): #16 of 128 (6-5)2021 (MRI 2.0): #23 of 130 (6-7)2022 (MRI 2.0): #49 of 131 (5-7)2023 (MRI 2.0): #34 of 133 (6-7)2024 (MRI 2.0): #37 of 134 (5-7)2025 (MRI 2.0): #29 of 136 (5-7) MRI 2.0Classic 1978 2025

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 150 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Two lines where both ratings cover a season - MRI 2.0 in red, Classic in grey. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRec MRI 2.0MRI Classic
2025 5–7 #29 of 136 · 10.37 –
2024 5–7 #37 of 134 · 8.20 –
2023 6–7 #34 of 133 · 7.75 –
2022 5–7 #49 of 131 · 5.54 –
2021 6–7 #23 of 130 · 12.49 –
2020 6–5 #16 of 128 · 14.11 –
2019 9–4 #11 of 130 · 20.93 #27 of 130 · 60.09
2018 8–5 #13 of 130 · 16.71 #33 of 130 · 48.72
2017 10–4 #9 of 130 · 22.79 #10 of 130 · 90.55
2016 8–5 #12 of 128 · 16.36 #24 of 128 · 59.39
2015 7–6 #33 of 128 · 9.89 #57 of 128 · 32.56
2014 8–5 #10 of 128 · 19.19 #24 of 128 · 58.30
2013 12–2 #17 of 125 · 18.80 #12 of 126 · 80.01
2012 3–9 #69 of 124 · -2.18 #102 of 124 · -18.73
2011 8–5 #38 of 120 · 6.07 #66 of 120 · 21.83
2010 14–0 #8 of 120 · 21.90 #7 of 120 · 95.56
2009 8–5 #32 of 120 · 8.15 #41 of 120 · 39.81
2008 5–7 #47 of 120 · 3.53 #67 of 120 · 17.81
2007 9–4 #18 of 119 · 12.41 #35 of 120 · 51.86
2006 11–2 #15 of 119 · 14.30 #18 of 119 · 74.23
2005 9–3 #10 of 119 · 18.09 #16 of 119 · 75.51
2004 13–0 #7 of 117 · 20.91 #5 of 117 · 113.93
2003 8–5 #24 of 117 · 12.04 #30 of 117 · 55.61
2002 9–4 #20 of 117 · 12.31 –
2001 7–5 #51 of 117 · 4.43 –
2000 9–4 #28 of 116 · 8.31 –
1999 5–6 #43 of 114 · 3.80 –
1998 3–8 #43 of 112 · 4.73 –
1997 10–3 #19 of 112 · 14.62 –
1996 8–4 #27 of 111 · 10.83 –
1995 8–4 #17 of 108 · 13.14 –
1994 9–2 #14 of 107 · 14.62 –
1993 11–0 #21 of 106 · 11.93 –
1992 5–6 #43 of 107 · 1.93 –
1991 5–6 #34 of 107 · 5.83 –
1990 8–4 #23 of 107 · 11.79 –
1989 10–2 #10 of 106 · 19.99 –
1988 10–2 #8 of 104 · 21.90 –
1987 9–3 #6 of 104 · 20.72 –
1986 10–2 #7 of 105 · 20.96 –
1985 8–4 #11 of 106 · 17.33 –
1984 9–4 #7 of 106 · 15.04 –
1983 11–1 #2 of 105 · 19.41 –
1982 9–3 #26 of 105 · 10.09 –
1981 5–6 #33 of 136 · 8.53 –
1980 5–6 #37 of 138 · 6.67 –
1979 8–3 #26 of 138 · 10.28 –
1978 6–5 #50 of 138 · 4.53 –