The MRI
2026 · Week 11

Baylor

Big 12 · 6–3 · 4–2 in conference · MRI Classic #30

Power+11.2#33 of 138
Résumé+1.33#41 · wins above average
Playoff chance2.5%#35 most likely · +0.3 pts this week
Trendrating by week

Who to root for this week

Nothing this weekend moves the needle.

Nothing this weekend moves the needle.

Best winIowa State (42–31)
Worst lossKansas (24–25)
Schedule faced-2.8 avg opponent
Schedule ahead+13.8 avg opponent
Roster talent#42 of 127 · worth +2.1, rated +11.2: beating it
Returning production60% of last year's · #39 of 128
Home field+2.7 pts · 89th of 131

How this rating is built

Power = w × (average margin counted + average opponent rating) + (1 − w) × preseason prior, where w = games ÷ (games + 4). After 9 games, w is 69%, so the preseason prior is 31% of this rating. Every game played shrinks that share.

PartValueWeightAdds
Margin counted+15.9 avg× 69%+11.0
Opponents faced-2.8 avg× 69%-1.9
Preseason prior+6.9× 31%+2.1
Power+11.2

This explains how the model reached the number. The opponent ratings come out of the same fitted model, so it is not independent proof that the rating is right.

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the result against expectation. Adds is a different question: how many points of Power the game contributes, counting its margin and the strength of the opponent together. A game can beat expectation and still add little, or the reverse. Adds, plus the preseason prior, sum to Power (figures are rounded so the column adds up). Hover an Adds figure for its arithmetic.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerfAdds
1 N Auburn L 16–17 +1.8 -2.8 +0.6
2 vs Prairie View A&M FCS W 44–3 +47.9 -6.9 +0.0
3 vs Louisiana Tech W 36–19 +13.9 +3.1 +1.5
4 vs Colorado W 23–13 +19.6 -9.6 +0.4
5 at Arizona State W 55–19 +7.8 +28.2 +3.2
7 vs TCU L 6–17 +7.9 -18.9 -0.8
8 at Kansas L 24–25 +7.2 -8.2 +0.2
9 at UCF W 41–9 +7.3 +24.7 +3.0
10 vs Iowa State W 42–31 +12.8 -1.8 +1.0
Preseason prior (31% of the rating)+2.1
Power+11.2

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
11 at BYU -6.6 34%
12 vs Texas Tech +0.0 50%
13 at Houston -4.2 40%

Coaches

Mean added leaves out 1978–1980, the first seasons rated, which have no preseason prior to measure against.

CoachYearsRecordMean added
Grant Teaff1978–199298-71-3+1.0
Chuck Reedy1993–199623-22-0.2
Dave Roberts1997–19984-18-4.2
Kevin Steele1999–20029-36-7.4
Guy Morriss2003–200718-40-3.2
Art Briles2008–201565-37+6.2
Jim Grobe20167-6-6.0
Matt Rhule2017–201919-20+1.6
Dave Aranda2020–202642-40+1.0

Season by season

Best finish: #2 in 2013. 48 seasons rated. The two columns' numbers are not comparable; the rank within each is. Season links open that year's game log.

25 1 150 2003 (MRI Classic): #105 of 117 (3-9)2004 (MRI Classic): #104 of 117 (3-8)2005 (MRI Classic): #76 of 119 (5-6)2006 (MRI Classic): #103 of 119 (4-8)2007 (MRI Classic): #118 of 120 (3-9)2008 (MRI Classic): #72 of 120 (4-8)2009 (MRI Classic): #104 of 120 (4-8)2010 (MRI Classic): #58 of 120 (7-6)2011 (MRI Classic): #18 of 120 (10-3)2012 (MRI Classic): #42 of 124 (8-5)2013 (MRI Classic): #2 of 126 (11-2)2014 (MRI Classic): #8 of 128 (11-2)2015 (MRI Classic): #13 of 128 (10-3)2016 (MRI Classic): #61 of 128 (7-6)2017 (MRI Classic): #114 of 130 (1-11)2018 (MRI Classic): #82 of 130 (7-6)2019 (MRI Classic): #25 of 130 (11-3)1978 (MRI 2.0): #58 of 138 (3-8)1979 (MRI 2.0): #25 of 138 (8-4)1980 (MRI 2.0): #13 of 138 (10-2)1981 (MRI 2.0): #38 of 136 (5-6)1982 (MRI 2.0): #46 of 105 (4-7)1983 (MRI 2.0): #37 of 105 (7-5)1984 (MRI 2.0): #42 of 106 (5-6)1985 (MRI 2.0): #20 of 106 (9-3)1986 (MRI 2.0): #22 of 105 (9-3)1987 (MRI 2.0): #49 of 104 (6-5)1988 (MRI 2.0): #55 of 104 (6-5)1989 (MRI 2.0): #36 of 106 (5-6)1990 (MRI 2.0): #39 of 107 (6-5)1991 (MRI 2.0): #28 of 107 (8-4)1992 (MRI 2.0): #28 of 107 (7-5)1993 (MRI 2.0): #58 of 106 (5-6)1994 (MRI 2.0): #41 of 107 (7-5)1995 (MRI 2.0): #31 of 108 (7-4)1996 (MRI 2.0): #53 of 111 (4-7)1997 (MRI 2.0): #80 of 112 (2-9)1998 (MRI 2.0): #73 of 112 (2-9)1999 (MRI 2.0): #102 of 114 (1-10)2000 (MRI 2.0): #105 of 116 (2-9)2001 (MRI 2.0): #98 of 117 (3-8)2002 (MRI 2.0): #103 of 117 (3-9)2003 (MRI 2.0): #108 of 117 (3-9)2004 (MRI 2.0): #102 of 117 (3-8)2005 (MRI 2.0): #76 of 119 (5-6)2006 (MRI 2.0): #77 of 119 (4-8)2007 (MRI 2.0): #99 of 119 (3-9)2008 (MRI 2.0): #64 of 120 (4-8)2009 (MRI 2.0): #70 of 120 (4-8)2010 (MRI 2.0): #62 of 120 (7-6)2011 (MRI 2.0): #25 of 120 (10-3)2012 (MRI 2.0): #23 of 124 (8-5)2013 (MRI 2.0): #4 of 125 (11-2)2014 (MRI 2.0): #5 of 128 (11-2)2015 (MRI 2.0): #7 of 128 (10-3)2016 (MRI 2.0): #35 of 128 (7-6)2017 (MRI 2.0): #86 of 130 (1-11)2018 (MRI 2.0): #69 of 130 (7-6)2019 (MRI 2.0): #21 of 130 (11-3)2020 (MRI 2.0): #48 of 128 (2-7)2021 (MRI 2.0): #14 of 130 (12-2)2022 (MRI 2.0): #40 of 131 (6-7)2023 (MRI 2.0): #84 of 133 (3-9)2024 (MRI 2.0): #35 of 134 (8-5)2025 (MRI 2.0): #51 of 136 (5-7) MRI 2.0Classic 1978 2025

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 150 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Two lines where both ratings cover a season - MRI 2.0 in red, Classic in grey. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRec MRI 2.0MRI Classic
2025 5–7 #51 of 136 · 4.13 –
2024 8–5 #35 of 134 · 8.66 –
2023 3–9 #84 of 133 · -4.05 –
2022 6–7 #40 of 131 · 8.26 –
2021 12–2 #14 of 130 · 15.29 –
2020 2–7 #48 of 128 · 4.23 –
2019 11–3 #21 of 130 · 13.14 #25 of 130 · 61.67
2018 7–6 #69 of 130 · -0.32 #82 of 130 · 12.55
2017 1–11 #86 of 130 · -5.24 #114 of 130 · -29.68
2016 7–6 #35 of 128 · 8.52 #61 of 128 · 25.33
2015 10–3 #7 of 128 · 20.14 #13 of 128 · 75.80
2014 11–2 #5 of 128 · 23.69 #8 of 128 · 85.25
2013 11–2 #4 of 125 · 24.94 #2 of 126 · 112.11
2012 8–5 #23 of 124 · 12.75 #42 of 124 · 44.19
2011 10–3 #25 of 120 · 9.74 #18 of 120 · 61.68
2010 7–6 #62 of 120 · 0.84 #58 of 120 · 24.94
2009 4–8 #70 of 120 · -2.69 #104 of 120 · -13.63
2008 4–8 #64 of 120 · -1.40 #72 of 120 · 14.68
2007 3–9 #99 of 119 · -14.09 #118 of 120 · -45.26
2006 4–8 #77 of 119 · -6.20 #103 of 119 · -20.30
2005 5–6 #76 of 119 · -4.18 #76 of 119 · 16.80
2004 3–8 #102 of 117 · -14.70 #104 of 117 · -24.59
2003 3–9 #108 of 117 · -18.18 #105 of 117 · -32.23
2002 3–9 #103 of 117 · -17.94 –
2001 3–8 #98 of 117 · -13.48 –
2000 2–9 #105 of 116 · -18.17 –
1999 1–10 #102 of 114 · -17.23 –
1998 2–9 #73 of 112 · -5.07 –
1997 2–9 #80 of 112 · -7.66 –
1996 4–7 #53 of 111 · 1.06 –
1995 7–4 #31 of 108 · 7.99 –
1994 7–5 #41 of 107 · 4.12 –
1993 5–6 #58 of 106 · -1.99 –
1992 7–5 #28 of 107 · 6.52 –
1991 8–4 #28 of 107 · 8.92 –
1990 6–5 #39 of 107 · 4.86 –
1989 5–6 #36 of 106 · 6.27 –
1988 6–5 #55 of 104 · -1.30 –
1987 6–5 #49 of 104 · -0.13 –
1986 9–3 #22 of 105 · 11.52 –
1985 9–3 #20 of 106 · 13.02 –
1984 5–6 #42 of 106 · 3.15 –
1983 7–5 #37 of 105 · 5.52 –
1982 4–7 #46 of 105 · 0.69 –
1981 5–6 #38 of 136 · 6.92 –
1980 10–2 #13 of 138 · 17.09 –
1979 8–4 #25 of 138 · 10.45 –
1978 3–8 #58 of 138 · 2.38 –