The MRI
2026 · Week 11

Southern Miss

Sun Belt · 3–6 · 2–3 in conference · MRI Classic #125

Power-15.5#122 of 138
Résumé-3.25#217 · wins above average
Playoff chance<0.1%out of the picture
Trendrating by week

Who to root for this week

Nothing this weekend moves the needle.

Nothing this weekend moves the needle.

Best winLouisiana (35–31)
Worst lossTroy (34–55)
Schedule faced-11.0 avg opponent
Schedule ahead-8.1 avg opponent
Roster talent#90 of 127 · worth -4.3, rated -15.5: short of it
Returning production90% of last year's · #7 of 128
Home field+2.2 pts · 121st of 131

How this rating is built

Power = w × (average margin counted + average opponent rating) + (1 − w) × preseason prior, where w = games ÷ (games + 4). After 9 games, w is 69%, so the preseason prior is 31% of this rating. Every game played shrinks that share.

PartValueWeightAdds
Margin counted-9.4 avg× 69%-6.5
Opponents faced-11.0 avg× 69%-7.6
Preseason prior-4.7× 31%-1.4
Power-15.5

This explains how the model reached the number. The opponent ratings come out of the same fitted model, so it is not independent proof that the rating is right.

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the result against expectation. Adds is a different question: how many points of Power the game contributes, counting its margin and the strength of the opponent together. A game can beat expectation and still add little, or the reverse. Adds, plus the preseason prior, sum to Power (figures are rounded so the column adds up). Hover an Adds figure for its arithmetic.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerfAdds
1 vs Alcorn State FCS W 49–3 +21.2 +24.8 -0.6
2 at Auburn L 8–43 -27.9 -7.1 -2.0
3 vs UConn L 20–48 -6.6 -21.4 -3.2
4 at Tulane L 21–24 -10.3 +7.3 -0.7
6 at Troy L 34–55 -6.2 -14.8 -2.8
7 vs Arkansas State L 13–23 -1.5 -8.5 -2.1
8 vs Louisiana W 35–31 -9.9 +13.9 +0.0
9 at Louisiana-Monroe W 35–21 +5.3 +8.7 -0.2
10 vs James Madison L 23–54 -17.6 -13.4 -2.5
Preseason prior (31% of the rating)-1.4
Power-15.5

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
11 at Louisiana Tech -18.9 13%
12 vs South Alabama -3.8 41%
13 at Old Dominion -2.7 44%

Coaches

Mean added leaves out 1978–1980, the first seasons rated, which have no preseason prior to measure against.

CoachYearsRecordMean added
Bobby Collins1978–198131-13-2+9.1
Jim Carmody1982–198737-29-2.3
Curley Hallman1988–198915-8+4.6
Jeff Bower1990–2007118-84-1+0.7
Larry Fedora2008–201134-19+2.5
Ellis Johnson20120-12-22.6
Todd Monken2013–201513-25-1.2
Jay Hopson2016–202028-23-1.6
Will Hall2021–202414-30-6.8
Blake Anderson20263-6-8.0

Season by season

Best finish: #12 in 2011. 48 seasons rated. The two columns' numbers are not comparable; the rank within each is. Season links open that year's game log.

25 1 150 2003 (MRI Classic): #32 of 117 (9-4)2004 (MRI Classic): #68 of 117 (7-5)2005 (MRI Classic): #44 of 119 (7-5)2006 (MRI Classic): #38 of 119 (9-5)2007 (MRI Classic): #60 of 120 (7-6)2008 (MRI Classic): #34 of 120 (7-6)2009 (MRI Classic): #54 of 120 (7-6)2010 (MRI Classic): #37 of 120 (8-5)2011 (MRI Classic): #12 of 120 (12-2)2012 (MRI Classic): #120 of 124 (0-12)2013 (MRI Classic): #124 of 126 (1-11)2014 (MRI Classic): #112 of 128 (3-9)2015 (MRI Classic): #38 of 128 (9-5)2016 (MRI Classic): #66 of 128 (7-6)2017 (MRI Classic): #70 of 130 (8-5)2018 (MRI Classic): #57 of 130 (6-5)2019 (MRI Classic): #73 of 130 (7-6)1978 (MRI 2.0): #44 of 138 (7-4)1979 (MRI 2.0): #34 of 138 (6-5)1980 (MRI 2.0): #28 of 138 (9-3)1981 (MRI 2.0): #17 of 136 (9-3)1982 (MRI 2.0): #27 of 105 (7-4)1983 (MRI 2.0): #31 of 105 (7-4)1984 (MRI 2.0): #71 of 106 (4-7)1985 (MRI 2.0): #47 of 106 (7-4)1986 (MRI 2.0): #65 of 105 (6-5)1987 (MRI 2.0): #70 of 104 (6-5)1988 (MRI 2.0): #42 of 104 (10-2)1989 (MRI 2.0): #41 of 106 (5-6)1990 (MRI 2.0): #35 of 107 (8-4)1991 (MRI 2.0): #62 of 107 (4-7)1992 (MRI 2.0): #46 of 107 (7-4)1993 (MRI 2.0): #77 of 106 (2-9)1994 (MRI 2.0): #62 of 107 (6-5)1995 (MRI 2.0): #51 of 108 (6-5)1996 (MRI 2.0): #37 of 111 (8-3)1997 (MRI 2.0): #23 of 112 (9-3)1998 (MRI 2.0): #31 of 112 (7-5)1999 (MRI 2.0): #22 of 114 (9-3)2000 (MRI 2.0): #23 of 116 (8-4)2001 (MRI 2.0): #39 of 117 (6-5)2002 (MRI 2.0): #58 of 117 (7-6)2003 (MRI 2.0): #47 of 117 (9-4)2004 (MRI 2.0): #62 of 117 (7-5)2005 (MRI 2.0): #58 of 119 (7-5)2006 (MRI 2.0): #47 of 119 (9-5)2007 (MRI 2.0): #67 of 119 (7-6)2008 (MRI 2.0): #59 of 120 (7-6)2009 (MRI 2.0): #60 of 120 (7-6)2010 (MRI 2.0): #60 of 120 (8-5)2011 (MRI 2.0): #28 of 120 (12-2)2012 (MRI 2.0): #109 of 124 (0-12)2013 (MRI 2.0): #118 of 125 (1-11)2014 (MRI 2.0): #122 of 128 (3-9)2015 (MRI 2.0): #71 of 128 (9-5)2016 (MRI 2.0): #79 of 128 (7-6)2017 (MRI 2.0): #89 of 130 (8-5)2018 (MRI 2.0): #91 of 130 (6-5)2019 (MRI 2.0): #87 of 130 (7-6)2020 (MRI 2.0): #113 of 128 (3-7)2021 (MRI 2.0): #121 of 130 (3-9)2022 (MRI 2.0): #99 of 131 (7-6)2023 (MRI 2.0): #114 of 133 (3-9)2024 (MRI 2.0): #133 of 134 (1-11)2025 (MRI 2.0): #106 of 136 (7-6) MRI 2.0Classic 1978 2025

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 150 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Two lines where both ratings cover a season - MRI 2.0 in red, Classic in grey. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRec MRI 2.0MRI Classic
2025 7–6 #106 of 136 · -11.87 –
2024 1–11 #133 of 134 · -25.65 –
2023 3–9 #114 of 133 · -13.56 –
2022 7–6 #99 of 131 · -7.93 –
2021 3–9 #121 of 130 · -18.35 –
2020 3–7 #113 of 128 · -14.97 –
2019 7–6 #87 of 130 · -5.37 #73 of 130 · 11.95
2018 6–5 #91 of 130 · -6.11 #57 of 130 · 28.02
2017 8–5 #89 of 130 · -6.73 #70 of 130 · 18.67
2016 7–6 #79 of 128 · -4.93 #66 of 128 · 18.18
2015 9–5 #71 of 128 · 0.04 #38 of 128 · 49.46
2014 3–9 #122 of 128 · -21.01 #112 of 128 · -24.23
2013 1–11 #118 of 125 · -28.14 #124 of 126 · -71.63
2012 0–12 #109 of 124 · -16.06 #120 of 124 · -59.77
2011 12–2 #28 of 120 · 9.05 #12 of 120 · 75.27
2010 8–5 #60 of 120 · 1.42 #37 of 120 · 47.95
2009 7–6 #60 of 120 · 0.06 #54 of 120 · 28.29
2008 7–6 #59 of 120 · 0.53 #34 of 120 · 44.76
2007 7–6 #67 of 119 · -1.08 #60 of 120 · 29.05
2006 9–5 #47 of 119 · 3.18 #38 of 119 · 46.32
2005 7–5 #58 of 119 · 1.42 #44 of 119 · 40.00
2004 7–5 #62 of 117 · -0.07 #68 of 117 · 21.39
2003 9–4 #47 of 117 · 3.61 #32 of 117 · 50.31
2002 7–6 #58 of 117 · 2.26 –
2001 6–5 #39 of 117 · 6.78 –
2000 8–4 #23 of 116 · 12.13 –
1999 9–3 #22 of 114 · 11.26 –
1998 7–5 #31 of 112 · 9.73 –
1997 9–3 #23 of 112 · 12.16 –
1996 8–3 #37 of 111 · 6.62 –
1995 6–5 #51 of 108 · 1.79 –
1994 6–5 #62 of 107 · -1.07 –
1993 2–9 #77 of 106 · -8.56 –
1992 7–4 #46 of 107 · 1.46 –
1991 4–7 #62 of 107 · -3.20 –
1990 8–4 #35 of 107 · 5.85 –
1989 5–6 #41 of 106 · 3.61 –
1988 10–2 #42 of 104 · 2.70 –
1987 6–5 #70 of 104 · -6.02 –
1986 6–5 #65 of 105 · -5.12 –
1985 7–4 #47 of 106 · 2.29 –
1984 4–7 #71 of 106 · -3.61 –
1983 7–4 #31 of 105 · 8.68 –
1982 7–4 #27 of 105 · 10.04 –
1981 9–3 #17 of 136 · 15.82 –
1980 9–3 #28 of 138 · 9.90 –
1979 6–5 #34 of 138 · 7.87 –
1978 7–4 #44 of 138 · 5.13 –