The MRI
2026 · Week 11

Georgia Tech

ACC · 2–7 · 1–5 in conference · MRI Classic #126

Power-6.8#94 of 138
Résumé-2.34#208 · wins above average
Playoff chance<0.1%out of the picture
Trendrating by week

Who to root for this week

Nothing this weekend moves the needle.

Nothing this weekend moves the needle.

Best winDuke (28–25)
Worst lossStanford (27–34)
Schedule faced-0.9 avg opponent
Schedule ahead+18.3 avg opponent
Roster talent#33 of 127 · worth +3.6, rated -6.8: short of it
Returning production13% of last year's · #112 of 128 · counted against its preseason rating
Home field+2.7 pts · 91st of 131

How this rating is built

Power = w × (average margin counted + average opponent rating) + (1 − w) × preseason prior, where w = games ÷ (games + 4). After 9 games, w is 69%, so the preseason prior is 31% of this rating. Every game played shrinks that share.

PartValueWeightAdds
Margin counted-11.7 avg× 69%-8.1
Opponents faced-0.9 avg× 69%-0.6
Preseason prior+6.2× 31%+1.9
Power-6.8

This explains how the model reached the number. The opponent ratings come out of the same fitted model, so it is not independent proof that the rating is right.

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the result against expectation. Adds is a different question: how many points of Power the game contributes, counting its margin and the strength of the opponent together. A game can beat expectation and still add little, or the reverse. Adds, plus the preseason prior, sum to Power (figures are rounded so the column adds up). Hover an Adds figure for its arithmetic.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerfAdds
1 vs Colorado L 13–14 +1.6 -2.6 -0.7
2 vs Tennessee L 24–45 -25.0 +4.0 -0.6
3 vs Mercer FCS W 44–11 +29.9 +3.1 -0.6
4 at Stanford L 27–34 -0.5 -6.5 -1.2
6 vs Duke W 28–25 -13.7 +16.7 +0.8
7 at Virginia Tech L 24–34 -12.5 +2.5 -0.6
8 vs Boston College L 27–49 +2.8 -24.8 -2.8
9 at Pittsburgh L 11–34 -16.3 -6.7 -1.4
10 vs Louisville L 17–44 -17.7 -9.3 -1.6
Preseason prior (31% of the rating)+1.9
Power-6.8

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
11 at Clemson -18.1 14%
12 vs Wake Forest -17.7 14%
13 at Georgia -42.5 0%

Coaches

Mean added leaves out 1978–1980, the first seasons rated, which have no preseason prior to measure against.

CoachYearsRecordMean added
Pepper Rodgers1978–197911-11-1–
Bill Curry1980–198631-43-4+1.6
Bobby Ross1987–199131-26-1+1.9
Bill Lewis1992–199310-12-4.0
George O'Leary1994–200152-33+2.6
Chan Gailey2002–200744-32+1.2
Paul Johnson2008–201883-60+2.3
Geoff Collins2019–202210-28-8.4
Brent Key2023–202625-23+1.9

Season by season

Best finish: #13 in 2014. 48 seasons rated. The two columns' numbers are not comparable; the rank within each is. Season links open that year's game log.

25 1 150 2003 (MRI Classic): #56 of 117 (7-6)2004 (MRI Classic): #38 of 117 (7-5)2005 (MRI Classic): #40 of 119 (7-5)2006 (MRI Classic): #39 of 119 (9-5)2007 (MRI Classic): #48 of 120 (7-6)2008 (MRI Classic): #47 of 120 (9-4)2009 (MRI Classic): #21 of 120 (11-3)2010 (MRI Classic): #73 of 120 (6-7)2011 (MRI Classic): #39 of 120 (8-5)2012 (MRI Classic): #51 of 124 (7-7)2013 (MRI Classic): #44 of 126 (7-6)2014 (MRI Classic): #13 of 128 (11-3)2015 (MRI Classic): #76 of 128 (3-9)2016 (MRI Classic): #47 of 128 (9-4)2017 (MRI Classic): #59 of 130 (5-6)2018 (MRI Classic): #55 of 130 (7-6)2019 (MRI Classic): #115 of 130 (3-9)1978 (MRI 2.0): #68 of 138 (7-5)1979 (MRI 2.0): #77 of 138 (4-7)1980 (MRI 2.0): #93 of 138 (1-10)1981 (MRI 2.0): #104 of 136 (1-10)1982 (MRI 2.0): #67 of 105 (6-5)1983 (MRI 2.0): #63 of 105 (3-8)1984 (MRI 2.0): #32 of 106 (6-5)1985 (MRI 2.0): #26 of 106 (9-3)1986 (MRI 2.0): #32 of 105 (5-6)1987 (MRI 2.0): #69 of 104 (2-9)1988 (MRI 2.0): #61 of 104 (3-8)1989 (MRI 2.0): #46 of 106 (7-4)1990 (MRI 2.0): #18 of 107 (11-1)1991 (MRI 2.0): #24 of 107 (8-5)1992 (MRI 2.0): #48 of 107 (5-6)1993 (MRI 2.0): #52 of 106 (5-6)1994 (MRI 2.0): #78 of 107 (1-10)1995 (MRI 2.0): #62 of 108 (6-5)1996 (MRI 2.0): #57 of 111 (5-6)1997 (MRI 2.0): #34 of 112 (7-5)1998 (MRI 2.0): #20 of 112 (10-2)1999 (MRI 2.0): #18 of 114 (8-4)2000 (MRI 2.0): #16 of 116 (9-3)2001 (MRI 2.0): #25 of 117 (8-5)2002 (MRI 2.0): #42 of 117 (7-6)2003 (MRI 2.0): #41 of 117 (7-6)2004 (MRI 2.0): #35 of 117 (7-5)2005 (MRI 2.0): #35 of 119 (7-5)2006 (MRI 2.0): #32 of 119 (9-5)2007 (MRI 2.0): #46 of 119 (7-6)2008 (MRI 2.0): #41 of 120 (9-4)2009 (MRI 2.0): #18 of 120 (11-3)2010 (MRI 2.0): #54 of 120 (6-7)2011 (MRI 2.0): #42 of 120 (8-5)2012 (MRI 2.0): #41 of 124 (7-7)2013 (MRI 2.0): #31 of 125 (7-6)2014 (MRI 2.0): #14 of 128 (11-3)2015 (MRI 2.0): #42 of 128 (3-9)2016 (MRI 2.0): #45 of 128 (9-4)2017 (MRI 2.0): #36 of 130 (5-6)2018 (MRI 2.0): #47 of 130 (7-6)2019 (MRI 2.0): #99 of 130 (3-9)2020 (MRI 2.0): #95 of 128 (3-7)2021 (MRI 2.0): #85 of 130 (3-9)2022 (MRI 2.0): #86 of 131 (5-7)2023 (MRI 2.0): #54 of 133 (7-6)2024 (MRI 2.0): #43 of 134 (7-6)2025 (MRI 2.0): #33 of 136 (9-4) MRI 2.0Classic 1978 2025

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 150 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Two lines where both ratings cover a season - MRI 2.0 in red, Classic in grey. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRec MRI 2.0MRI Classic
2025 9–4 #33 of 136 · 9.29 –
2024 7–6 #43 of 134 · 7.05 –
2023 7–6 #54 of 133 · 2.87 –
2022 5–7 #86 of 131 · -4.76 –
2021 3–9 #85 of 130 · -2.75 –
2020 3–7 #95 of 128 · -6.71 –
2019 3–9 #99 of 130 · -9.38 #115 of 130 · -33.31
2018 7–6 #47 of 130 · 5.67 #55 of 130 · 28.21
2017 5–6 #36 of 130 · 7.44 #59 of 130 · 28.03
2016 9–4 #45 of 128 · 6.86 #47 of 128 · 34.53
2015 3–9 #42 of 128 · 7.30 #76 of 128 · 11.54
2014 11–3 #14 of 128 · 17.20 #13 of 128 · 72.48
2013 7–6 #31 of 125 · 10.31 #44 of 126 · 42.60
2012 7–7 #41 of 124 · 6.68 #51 of 124 · 36.02
2011 8–5 #42 of 120 · 5.25 #39 of 120 · 41.55
2010 6–7 #54 of 120 · 3.52 #73 of 120 · 13.66
2009 11–3 #18 of 120 · 12.31 #21 of 120 · 56.58
2008 9–4 #41 of 120 · 5.07 #47 of 120 · 34.85
2007 7–6 #46 of 119 · 5.36 #48 of 120 · 36.88
2006 9–5 #32 of 119 · 8.78 #39 of 119 · 46.22
2005 7–5 #35 of 119 · 7.49 #40 of 119 · 43.69
2004 7–5 #35 of 117 · 7.51 #38 of 117 · 41.77
2003 7–6 #41 of 117 · 5.98 #56 of 117 · 34.12
2002 7–6 #42 of 117 · 6.18 –
2001 8–5 #25 of 117 · 10.45 –
2000 9–3 #16 of 116 · 14.69 –
1999 8–4 #18 of 114 · 12.40 –
1998 10–2 #20 of 112 · 12.33 –
1997 7–5 #34 of 112 · 6.49 –
1996 5–6 #57 of 111 · -0.23 –
1995 6–5 #62 of 108 · -1.76 –
1994 1–10 #78 of 107 · -9.08 –
1993 5–6 #52 of 106 · -0.58 –
1992 5–6 #48 of 107 · 1.16 –
1991 8–5 #24 of 107 · 10.53 –
1990 11–1 #18 of 107 · 15.84 –
1989 7–4 #46 of 106 · 2.63 –
1988 3–8 #61 of 104 · -3.64 –
1987 2–9 #69 of 104 · -5.89 –
1986 5–6 #32 of 105 · 6.15 –
1985 9–3 #26 of 106 · 9.76 –
1984 6–5 #32 of 106 · 6.60 –
1983 3–8 #63 of 105 · -3.49 –
1982 6–5 #67 of 105 · -4.35 –
1981 1–10 #104 of 136 · -7.70 –
1980 1–10 #93 of 138 · -5.12 –
1979 4–7 #77 of 138 · -1.96 –
1978 7–5 #68 of 138 · 1.06 –