The MRI
2026 · Week 11

Virginia Tech

ACC · 6–3 · 3–3 in conference · MRI Classic #51

Power+2.7#54 of 138
Résumé+0.87#50 · wins above average
Playoff chance<0.1%out of the picture
Trendrating by week

Who to root for this week

Nothing this weekend moves the needle.

Nothing this weekend moves the needle.

Best winClemson (20–16)
Worst lossCalifornia (20–25)
Schedule faced-6.4 avg opponent
Schedule ahead+5.7 avg opponent
Roster talent#26 of 127 · worth +4.5, rated +2.7: in line with it
Returning production37% of last year's · #72 of 128
Home field+3.8 pts · 16th of 131

How this rating is built

Power = w × (average margin counted + average opponent rating) + (1 − w) × preseason prior, where w = games ÷ (games + 4). After 9 games, w is 69%, so the preseason prior is 31% of this rating. Every game played shrinks that share.

PartValueWeightAdds
Margin counted+9.4 avg× 69%+6.5
Opponents faced-6.4 avg× 69%-4.4
Preseason prior+1.9× 31%+0.6
Power+2.7

This explains how the model reached the number. The opponent ratings come out of the same fitted model, so it is not independent proof that the rating is right.

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the result against expectation. Adds is a different question: how many points of Power the game contributes, counting its margin and the strength of the opponent together. A game can beat expectation and still add little, or the reverse. Adds, plus the preseason prior, sum to Power (figures are rounded so the column adds up). Hover an Adds figure for its arithmetic.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerfAdds
1 vs VMI FCS W 73–3 +39.4 +30.6 +0.3
2 vs Old Dominion W 44–21 +21.5 +1.5 +0.7
3 at Maryland W 35–26 +1.2 +7.8 +1.0
4 at Boston College W 21–14 +6.2 +0.8 +0.4
5 vs Pittsburgh L 33–35 -0.8 -1.2 +0.1
6 at California L 20–25 +7.3 -12.3 -0.9
7 vs Georgia Tech W 34–24 +12.5 -2.5 +0.3
8 at Clemson W 20–16 -8.6 +12.6 +1.3
10 at SMU L 28–51 -11.6 -11.4 -1.1
Preseason prior (31% of the rating)+0.6
Power+2.7

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
11 vs Stanford +15.0 82%
12 at Miami (FL) -26.6 5%
13 vs Virginia +5.4 63%

Coaches

Mean added leaves out 1978–1980, the first seasons rated, which have no preseason prior to measure against.

CoachYearsRecordMean added
Bill Dooley1978–198663-38-1+0.8
Frank Beamer1987–2015238-121-2+3.5
Justin Fuente2016–202143-31+1.3
Brent Pry2022–202516-24+0.0
James Franklin20266-3+7.0

Season by season

Best finish: #3 in 2005. 48 seasons rated. The two columns' numbers are not comparable; the rank within each is. Season links open that year's game log.

25 1 100 2003 (MRI Classic): #24 of 117 (8-5)2004 (MRI Classic): #13 of 117 (10-3)2005 (MRI Classic): #3 of 119 (11-2)2006 (MRI Classic): #16 of 119 (10-3)2007 (MRI Classic): #10 of 120 (11-3)2008 (MRI Classic): #24 of 120 (10-4)2009 (MRI Classic): #7 of 120 (10-3)2010 (MRI Classic): #14 of 120 (11-3)2011 (MRI Classic): #16 of 120 (11-3)2012 (MRI Classic): #61 of 124 (7-6)2013 (MRI Classic): #33 of 126 (8-5)2014 (MRI Classic): #46 of 128 (7-6)2015 (MRI Classic): #60 of 128 (7-6)2016 (MRI Classic): #26 of 128 (10-4)2017 (MRI Classic): #27 of 130 (9-4)2018 (MRI Classic): #91 of 130 (6-7)2019 (MRI Classic): #61 of 130 (8-5)1978 (MRI 2.0): #97 of 138 (4-7)1979 (MRI 2.0): #73 of 138 (5-6)1980 (MRI 2.0): #42 of 138 (8-4)1981 (MRI 2.0): #37 of 136 (7-4)1982 (MRI 2.0): #50 of 105 (7-4)1983 (MRI 2.0): #33 of 105 (9-2)1984 (MRI 2.0): #39 of 106 (8-4)1985 (MRI 2.0): #46 of 106 (6-5)1986 (MRI 2.0): #44 of 105 (9-3)1987 (MRI 2.0): #61 of 104 (2-9)1988 (MRI 2.0): #68 of 104 (3-8)1989 (MRI 2.0): #42 of 106 (6-5)1990 (MRI 2.0): #34 of 107 (6-5)1991 (MRI 2.0): #37 of 107 (5-6)1992 (MRI 2.0): #50 of 107 (2-9)1993 (MRI 2.0): #24 of 106 (9-3)1994 (MRI 2.0): #25 of 107 (8-4)1995 (MRI 2.0): #14 of 108 (10-2)1996 (MRI 2.0): #16 of 111 (10-2)1997 (MRI 2.0): #31 of 112 (7-5)1998 (MRI 2.0): #15 of 112 (9-3)1999 (MRI 2.0): #4 of 114 (11-1)2000 (MRI 2.0): #5 of 116 (11-1)2001 (MRI 2.0): #8 of 117 (8-4)2002 (MRI 2.0): #15 of 117 (10-4)2003 (MRI 2.0): #19 of 117 (8-5)2004 (MRI 2.0): #10 of 117 (10-3)2005 (MRI 2.0): #3 of 119 (11-2)2006 (MRI 2.0): #10 of 119 (10-3)2007 (MRI 2.0): #11 of 119 (11-3)2008 (MRI 2.0): #25 of 120 (10-4)2009 (MRI 2.0): #7 of 120 (10-3)2010 (MRI 2.0): #11 of 120 (11-3)2011 (MRI 2.0): #21 of 120 (11-3)2012 (MRI 2.0): #48 of 124 (7-6)2013 (MRI 2.0): #43 of 125 (8-5)2014 (MRI 2.0): #40 of 128 (7-6)2015 (MRI 2.0): #43 of 128 (7-6)2016 (MRI 2.0): #18 of 128 (10-4)2017 (MRI 2.0): #19 of 130 (9-4)2018 (MRI 2.0): #58 of 130 (6-7)2019 (MRI 2.0): #48 of 130 (8-5)2020 (MRI 2.0): #45 of 128 (5-6)2021 (MRI 2.0): #72 of 130 (6-7)2022 (MRI 2.0): #94 of 131 (3-8)2023 (MRI 2.0): #46 of 133 (7-6)2024 (MRI 2.0): #31 of 134 (6-7)2025 (MRI 2.0): #76 of 136 (3-9) MRI 2.0Classic 1978 2025

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 100 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Two lines where both ratings cover a season - MRI 2.0 in red, Classic in grey. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRec MRI 2.0MRI Classic
2025 3–9 #76 of 136 · -2.48 –
2024 6–7 #31 of 134 · 10.66 –
2023 7–6 #46 of 133 · 5.09 –
2022 3–8 #94 of 131 · -6.72 –
2021 6–7 #72 of 130 · 0.48 –
2020 5–6 #45 of 128 · 4.64 –
2019 8–5 #48 of 130 · 3.78 #61 of 130 · 19.40
2018 6–7 #58 of 130 · 2.19 #91 of 130 · 3.03
2017 9–4 #19 of 130 · 14.71 #27 of 130 · 59.83
2016 10–4 #18 of 128 · 13.14 #26 of 128 · 55.30
2015 7–6 #43 of 128 · 6.66 #60 of 128 · 29.10
2014 7–6 #40 of 128 · 7.48 #46 of 128 · 36.24
2013 8–5 #43 of 125 · 7.20 #33 of 126 · 51.91
2012 7–6 #48 of 124 · 5.51 #61 of 124 · 26.43
2011 11–3 #21 of 120 · 11.46 #16 of 120 · 67.61
2010 11–3 #11 of 120 · 18.19 #14 of 120 · 75.90
2009 10–3 #7 of 120 · 19.19 #7 of 120 · 88.75
2008 10–4 #25 of 120 · 9.57 #24 of 120 · 52.84
2007 11–3 #11 of 119 · 16.96 #10 of 120 · 83.47
2006 10–3 #10 of 119 · 17.39 #16 of 119 · 77.46
2005 11–2 #3 of 119 · 25.25 #3 of 119 · 122.56
2004 10–3 #10 of 117 · 18.13 #13 of 117 · 80.30
2003 8–5 #19 of 117 · 13.01 #24 of 117 · 65.32
2002 10–4 #15 of 117 · 14.90 –
2001 8–4 #8 of 117 · 18.75 –
2000 11–1 #5 of 116 · 23.22 –
1999 11–1 #4 of 114 · 22.78 –
1998 9–3 #15 of 112 · 16.06 –
1997 7–5 #31 of 112 · 7.39 –
1996 10–2 #16 of 111 · 16.29 –
1995 10–2 #14 of 108 · 14.50 –
1994 8–4 #25 of 107 · 9.11 –
1993 9–3 #24 of 106 · 11.44 –
1992 2–9 #50 of 107 · 0.99 –
1991 5–6 #37 of 107 · 4.65 –
1990 6–5 #34 of 107 · 5.87 –
1989 6–5 #42 of 106 · 3.21 –
1988 3–8 #68 of 104 · -4.83 –
1987 2–9 #61 of 104 · -3.46 –
1986 9–3 #44 of 105 · 2.56 –
1985 6–5 #46 of 106 · 2.48 –
1984 8–4 #39 of 106 · 4.10 –
1983 9–2 #33 of 105 · 7.37 –
1982 7–4 #50 of 105 · -0.45 –
1981 7–4 #37 of 136 · 7.09 –
1980 8–4 #42 of 138 · 4.93 –
1979 5–6 #73 of 138 · -1.15 –
1978 4–7 #97 of 138 · -5.48 –