The MRI
2026 · Week 11

SMU

ACC · 7–2 · 5–2 in conference · MRI Classic #24

Power+11.3#31 of 138
Résumé+1.67#36 · wins above average
Playoff chance5.2%#25 most likely · +0.2 pts this week
Trendrating by week

Who to root for this week

2 games · top: North Carolina over Louisville, +2.1 pts playoff odds

The games this week that move its playoff odds most, and the side to cheer. Other teams’ games only; its own game is in the schedule below. How these are worked out.

Best winFlorida State (27–24)
Worst lossSyracuse (27–30)
Schedule faced-4.8 avg opponent
Schedule ahead+11.4 avg opponent
HeismanKevin Jennings · 2.4% to win
Roster talent#30 of 127 · worth +4.3, rated +11.3: beating it
Returning production57% of last year's · #48 of 128
Home field+3.5 pts · 20th of 131

How this rating is built

Power = w × (average margin counted + average opponent rating) + (1 − w) × preseason prior, where w = games ÷ (games + 4). After 9 games, w is 69%, so the preseason prior is 31% of this rating. Every game played shrinks that share.

PartValueWeightAdds
Margin counted+14.4 avg× 69%+10.0
Opponents faced-4.8 avg× 69%-3.3
Preseason prior+15.1× 31%+4.6
Power+11.3

This explains how the model reached the number. The opponent ratings come out of the same fitted model, so it is not independent proof that the rating is right.

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the result against expectation. Adds is a different question: how many points of Power the game contributes, counting its margin and the strength of the opponent together. A game can beat expectation and still add little, or the reverse. Adds, plus the preseason prior, sum to Power (figures are rounded so the column adds up). Hover an Adds figure for its arithmetic.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerfAdds
1 at Florida State W 27–24 +1.6 +1.4 +1.0
2 vs UC Davis FCS W 56–10 +48.0 -2.0 +0.4
3 at Louisville L 31–41 -5.6 -4.4 +0.3
4 vs Missouri State W 34–24 +29.8 -19.8 -0.4
5 vs Boston College W 25–16 +20.9 -11.9 +0.2
7 vs Virginia W 23–13 +14.0 -4.0 +0.8
8 vs California W 59–20 +21.9 +17.1 +2.3
9 at Syracuse L 27–30 +9.0 -12.0 -0.1
10 vs Virginia Tech W 51–28 +11.6 +11.4 +2.2
Preseason prior (31% of the rating)+4.6
Power+11.3

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
11 vs Wake Forest +0.4 51%
12 at Notre Dame -21.3 10%
13 at Stanford +17.6 86%

Coaches

Mean added leaves out 1978–1980, the first seasons rated, which have no preseason prior to measure against.

CoachYearsRecordMean added
Ron Meyer1978–198127-17-1+10.6
Bobby Collins1982–198643-14-1+0.5
Forrest Gregg1989–19903-19-5.0
Tom Rossley1991–199615-48-3-2.0
Mike Cavan1997–200122-34-3.4
Phil Bennett2002–200718-52-5.9
June Jones2008–201436-43-3.4
Chad Morris2015–201714-23+0.6
Sonny Dykes2018–202130-17+1.9
Rhett Lashlee2022–202645-18+4.2

Season by season

Best finish: #7 in 1981. 46 seasons rated. The two columns' numbers are not comparable; the rank within each is. Season links open that year's game log.

25 1 150 2003 (MRI Classic): #112 of 117 (0-12)2004 (MRI Classic): #115 of 117 (3-8)2005 (MRI Classic): #91 of 119 (5-6)2006 (MRI Classic): #67 of 119 (6-6)2007 (MRI Classic): #110 of 120 (1-11)2008 (MRI Classic): #116 of 120 (1-11)2009 (MRI Classic): #47 of 120 (8-5)2010 (MRI Classic): #61 of 120 (7-7)2011 (MRI Classic): #64 of 120 (8-5)2012 (MRI Classic): #62 of 124 (7-6)2013 (MRI Classic): #95 of 126 (5-7)2014 (MRI Classic): #127 of 128 (1-11)2015 (MRI Classic): #115 of 128 (2-10)2016 (MRI Classic): #99 of 128 (5-7)2017 (MRI Classic): #72 of 130 (7-6)2018 (MRI Classic): #93 of 130 (5-7)2019 (MRI Classic): #29 of 130 (10-3)1978 (MRI 2.0): #36 of 138 (4-7)1979 (MRI 2.0): #45 of 138 (5-6)1980 (MRI 2.0): #17 of 138 (8-4)1981 (MRI 2.0): #7 of 136 (10-1)1982 (MRI 2.0): #9 of 105 (11-1)1983 (MRI 2.0): #26 of 105 (10-2)1984 (MRI 2.0): #18 of 106 (10-2)1985 (MRI 2.0): #25 of 106 (6-5)1986 (MRI 2.0): #37 of 105 (6-5)1989 (MRI 2.0): #98 of 106 (2-9)1990 (MRI 2.0): #100 of 107 (1-10)1991 (MRI 2.0): #95 of 107 (1-10)1992 (MRI 2.0): #85 of 107 (5-6)1993 (MRI 2.0): #78 of 106 (2-9)1994 (MRI 2.0): #79 of 107 (1-10)1995 (MRI 2.0): #96 of 108 (1-10)1996 (MRI 2.0): #72 of 111 (5-6)1997 (MRI 2.0): #65 of 112 (6-5)1998 (MRI 2.0): #66 of 112 (5-7)1999 (MRI 2.0): #87 of 114 (4-6)2000 (MRI 2.0): #99 of 116 (3-9)2001 (MRI 2.0): #92 of 117 (4-7)2002 (MRI 2.0): #105 of 117 (3-9)2003 (MRI 2.0): #112 of 117 (0-12)2004 (MRI 2.0): #114 of 117 (3-8)2005 (MRI 2.0): #96 of 119 (5-6)2006 (MRI 2.0): #84 of 119 (6-6)2007 (MRI 2.0): #108 of 119 (1-11)2008 (MRI 2.0): #116 of 120 (1-11)2009 (MRI 2.0): #86 of 120 (8-5)2010 (MRI 2.0): #75 of 120 (7-7)2011 (MRI 2.0): #65 of 120 (8-5)2012 (MRI 2.0): #61 of 124 (7-6)2013 (MRI 2.0): #82 of 125 (5-7)2014 (MRI 2.0): #124 of 128 (1-11)2015 (MRI 2.0): #115 of 128 (2-10)2016 (MRI 2.0): #98 of 128 (5-7)2017 (MRI 2.0): #83 of 130 (7-6)2018 (MRI 2.0): #95 of 130 (5-7)2019 (MRI 2.0): #44 of 130 (10-3)2020 (MRI 2.0): #44 of 128 (7-3)2021 (MRI 2.0): #48 of 130 (8-4)2022 (MRI 2.0): #56 of 131 (7-6)2023 (MRI 2.0): #27 of 133 (11-3)2024 (MRI 2.0): #11 of 134 (11-3)2025 (MRI 2.0): #20 of 136 (9-4) MRI 2.0Classic 1978 2025

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 150 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Two lines where both ratings cover a season - MRI 2.0 in red, Classic in grey. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRec MRI 2.0MRI Classic
2025 9–4 #20 of 136 · 14.99 –
2024 11–3 #11 of 134 · 17.14 –
2023 11–3 #27 of 133 · 10.38 –
2022 7–6 #56 of 131 · 4.86 –
2021 8–4 #48 of 130 · 5.78 –
2020 7–3 #44 of 128 · 4.79 –
2019 10–3 #44 of 130 · 4.59 #29 of 130 · 52.80
2018 5–7 #95 of 130 · -6.77 #93 of 130 · 0.43
2017 7–6 #83 of 130 · -3.97 #72 of 130 · 18.62
2016 5–7 #98 of 128 · -11.51 #99 of 128 · -12.23
2015 2–10 #115 of 128 · -20.06 #115 of 128 · -38.87
2014 1–11 #124 of 128 · -22.35 #127 of 128 · -76.93
2013 5–7 #82 of 125 · -6.58 #95 of 126 · -9.68
2012 7–6 #61 of 124 · 1.42 #62 of 124 · 25.12
2011 8–5 #65 of 120 · -0.73 #64 of 120 · 22.91
2010 7–7 #75 of 120 · -4.78 #61 of 120 · 22.41
2009 8–5 #86 of 120 · -7.86 #47 of 120 · 32.59
2008 1–11 #116 of 120 · -20.06 #116 of 120 · -52.42
2007 1–11 #108 of 119 · -16.05 #110 of 120 · -30.06
2006 6–6 #84 of 119 · -7.71 #67 of 119 · 13.80
2005 5–6 #96 of 119 · -12.14 #91 of 119 · 1.84
2004 3–8 #114 of 117 · -21.28 #115 of 117 · -43.05
2003 0–12 #112 of 117 · -24.87 #112 of 117 · -47.35
2002 3–9 #105 of 117 · -19.16 –
2001 4–7 #92 of 117 · -11.85 –
2000 3–9 #99 of 116 · -16.55 –
1999 4–6 #87 of 114 · -9.16 –
1998 5–7 #66 of 112 · -3.28 –
1997 6–5 #65 of 112 · -2.93 –
1996 5–6 #72 of 111 · -6.47 –
1995 1–10 #96 of 108 · -16.80 –
1994 1–10 #79 of 107 · -10.36 –
1993 2–9 #78 of 106 · -8.61 –
1992 5–6 #85 of 107 · -9.21 –
1991 1–10 #95 of 107 · -16.69 –
1990 1–10 #100 of 107 · -18.93 –
1989 2–9 #98 of 106 · -21.77 –
1986 6–5 #37 of 105 · 3.54 –
1985 6–5 #25 of 106 · 9.99 –
1984 10–2 #18 of 106 · 10.43 –
1983 10–2 #26 of 105 · 10.58 –
1982 11–1 #9 of 105 · 16.60 –
1981 10–1 #7 of 136 · 20.99 –
1980 8–4 #17 of 138 · 15.17 –
1979 5–6 #45 of 138 · 4.41 –
1978 4–7 #36 of 138 · 7.15 –