The MRI
2026 · Week 11

Arkansas State

Sun Belt · 4–5 · 2–3 in conference · MRI Classic #98

Power-11.0#105 of 138
Résumé-2.37#209 · wins above average
Playoff chance<0.1%out of the picture
Trendrating by week

Who to root for this week

Nothing this weekend moves the needle.

Nothing this weekend moves the needle.

Best winGeorgia State (38–32)
Worst lossLouisiana-Monroe (17–19)
Schedule faced-11.1 avg opponent
Schedule ahead-8.5 avg opponent
Roster talent#87 of 127 · worth -4.1, rated -11.0: short of it
Returning production30% of last year's · #84 of 128
Home field+3.1 pts · 41st of 131

How this rating is built

Power = w × (average margin counted + average opponent rating) + (1 − w) × preseason prior, where w = games ÷ (games + 4). After 9 games, w is 69%, so the preseason prior is 31% of this rating. Every game played shrinks that share.

PartValueWeightAdds
Margin counted-0.2 avg× 69%-0.2
Opponents faced-11.1 avg× 69%-7.7
Preseason prior-10.2× 31%-3.1
Power-11.0

This explains how the model reached the number. The opponent ratings come out of the same fitted model, so it is not independent proof that the rating is right.

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the result against expectation. Adds is a different question: how many points of Power the game contributes, counting its margin and the strength of the opponent together. A game can beat expectation and still add little, or the reverse. Adds, plus the preseason prior, sum to Power (figures are rounded so the column adds up). Hover an Adds figure for its arithmetic.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerfAdds
1 at Memphis L 24–42 -18.0 -0.0 -1.2
2 vs West Georgia FCS W 52–7 +25.7 +19.3 +0.3
3 at TCU L 7–31 -20.3 -3.7 -1.5
4 vs Kennesaw State W 17–14 +5.8 -2.8 -1.0
5 at Louisiana L 20–23 -11.4 +8.4 -0.3
6 vs South Alabama L 49–56 +0.8 -7.8 -1.6
7 at Southern Miss W 23–13 +1.5 +8.5 +0.0
8 vs Georgia State W 38–32 +1.1 +4.9 -0.3
10 vs Louisiana-Monroe L 17–19 +15.9 -17.9 -2.3
Preseason prior (31% of the rating)-3.1
Power-11.0

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
11 at Coastal Carolina -0.4 49%
12 at Louisiana Tech -14.3 19%
13 vs Troy +4.4 60%

Coaches

Mean added leaves out 1978–1980, the first seasons rated, which have no preseason prior to measure against.

CoachYearsRecordMean added
Bill Davidson19787-4–
Larry Lacewell1979–198112-21+8.3
Al Kincaid1990–19914-17-1-12.0
Ray Perkins19922-9-10.9
John Bobo1993–199613-30-1-5.5
Joe Hollis1997–200113-43-8.3
Steve Roberts2002–201045-63-3.3
Hugh Freeze201110-3+4.8
Gus Malzahn20129-3+4.0
Bryan Harsin20137-5-5.7
Blake Anderson2014–202051-37-2.0
Butch Jones2021–202630-42-4.4

Season by season

Best finish: #23 in 2012. 40 seasons rated. The two columns' numbers are not comparable; the rank within each is. Season links open that year's game log.

25 1 150 2003 (MRI Classic): #103 of 117 (5-7)2004 (MRI Classic): #108 of 117 (3-8)2005 (MRI Classic): #93 of 119 (6-6)2006 (MRI Classic): #100 of 119 (6-6)2007 (MRI Classic): #82 of 120 (5-7)2008 (MRI Classic): #58 of 120 (6-6)2009 (MRI Classic): #85 of 120 (4-8)2010 (MRI Classic): #75 of 120 (4-8)2011 (MRI Classic): #28 of 120 (10-3)2012 (MRI Classic): #23 of 124 (10-3)2013 (MRI Classic): #66 of 126 (8-5)2014 (MRI Classic): #68 of 128 (7-6)2015 (MRI Classic): #52 of 128 (9-4)2016 (MRI Classic): #55 of 128 (8-5)2017 (MRI Classic): #47 of 130 (7-5)2018 (MRI Classic): #37 of 130 (8-5)2019 (MRI Classic): #70 of 130 (8-5)1978 (MRI 2.0): #73 of 138 (7-4)1979 (MRI 2.0): #94 of 138 (4-7)1980 (MRI 2.0): #131 of 138 (2-9)1981 (MRI 2.0): #92 of 136 (6-5)1990 (MRI 2.0): #98 of 107 (3-8)1991 (MRI 2.0): #106 of 107 (1-10)1992 (MRI 2.0): #107 of 107 (2-9)1993 (MRI 2.0): #104 of 106 (2-9)1994 (MRI 2.0): #104 of 107 (1-10)1995 (MRI 2.0): #101 of 108 (6-5)1996 (MRI 2.0): #99 of 111 (4-7)1997 (MRI 2.0): #111 of 112 (2-9)1998 (MRI 2.0): #110 of 112 (4-8)1999 (MRI 2.0): #103 of 114 (4-7)2000 (MRI 2.0): #104 of 116 (1-10)2001 (MRI 2.0): #116 of 117 (2-9)2002 (MRI 2.0): #109 of 117 (6-7)2003 (MRI 2.0): #111 of 117 (5-7)2004 (MRI 2.0): #110 of 117 (3-8)2005 (MRI 2.0): #105 of 119 (6-6)2006 (MRI 2.0): #109 of 119 (6-6)2007 (MRI 2.0): #97 of 119 (5-7)2008 (MRI 2.0): #85 of 120 (6-6)2009 (MRI 2.0): #91 of 120 (4-8)2010 (MRI 2.0): #91 of 120 (4-8)2011 (MRI 2.0): #68 of 120 (10-3)2012 (MRI 2.0): #57 of 124 (10-3)2013 (MRI 2.0): #74 of 125 (8-5)2014 (MRI 2.0): #79 of 128 (7-6)2015 (MRI 2.0): #74 of 128 (9-4)2016 (MRI 2.0): #73 of 128 (8-5)2017 (MRI 2.0): #72 of 130 (7-5)2018 (MRI 2.0): #77 of 130 (8-5)2019 (MRI 2.0): #90 of 130 (8-5)2020 (MRI 2.0): #100 of 128 (4-7)2021 (MRI 2.0): #120 of 130 (2-10)2022 (MRI 2.0): #120 of 131 (3-9)2023 (MRI 2.0): #106 of 133 (6-7)2024 (MRI 2.0): #108 of 134 (8-5)2025 (MRI 2.0): #102 of 136 (7-6) MRI 2.0Classic 1978 2025

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 150 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Two lines where both ratings cover a season - MRI 2.0 in red, Classic in grey. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRec MRI 2.0MRI Classic
2025 7–6 #102 of 136 · -10.61 –
2024 8–5 #108 of 134 · -11.05 –
2023 6–7 #106 of 133 · -9.43 –
2022 3–9 #120 of 131 · -15.79 –
2021 2–10 #120 of 130 · -17.82 –
2020 4–7 #100 of 128 · -9.65 –
2019 8–5 #90 of 130 · -6.24 #70 of 130 · 12.87
2018 8–5 #77 of 130 · -2.36 #37 of 130 · 42.78
2017 7–5 #72 of 130 · -1.27 #47 of 130 · 38.08
2016 8–5 #73 of 128 · -2.85 #55 of 128 · 28.30
2015 9–4 #74 of 128 · -0.73 #52 of 128 · 38.11
2014 7–6 #79 of 128 · -4.04 #68 of 128 · 20.49
2013 8–5 #74 of 125 · -3.20 #66 of 126 · 22.61
2012 10–3 #57 of 124 · 3.41 #23 of 124 · 58.68
2011 10–3 #68 of 120 · -1.15 #28 of 120 · 53.57
2010 4–8 #91 of 120 · -9.09 #75 of 120 · 11.15
2009 4–8 #91 of 120 · -10.05 #85 of 120 · 1.12
2008 6–6 #85 of 120 · -8.38 #58 of 120 · 26.31
2007 5–7 #97 of 119 · -13.22 #82 of 120 · 9.93
2006 6–6 #109 of 119 · -17.27 #100 of 119 · -13.17
2005 6–6 #105 of 119 · -16.83 #93 of 119 · -4.55
2004 3–8 #110 of 117 · -20.37 #108 of 117 · -26.98
2003 5–7 #111 of 117 · -22.03 #103 of 117 · -29.50
2002 6–7 #109 of 117 · -19.84 –
2001 2–9 #116 of 117 · -27.78 –
2000 1–10 #104 of 116 · -17.51 –
1999 4–7 #103 of 114 · -17.50 –
1998 4–8 #110 of 112 · -25.78 –
1997 2–9 #111 of 112 · -29.30 –
1996 4–7 #99 of 111 · -19.69 –
1995 6–5 #101 of 108 · -21.13 –
1994 1–10 #104 of 107 · -26.50 –
1993 2–9 #104 of 106 · -26.97 –
1992 2–9 #107 of 107 · -29.23 –
1991 1–10 #106 of 107 · -26.63 –
1990 3–8 #98 of 107 · -17.85 –
1981 6–5 #92 of 136 · -5.35 –
1980 2–9 #131 of 138 · -19.23 –
1979 4–7 #94 of 138 · -5.03 –
1978 7–4 #73 of 138 · -0.14 –