The MRI
2026 · Week 11

Rutgers

Big Ten · 2–7 · 1–5 in conference · MRI Classic #121

Power-5.7#86 of 138
Résumé-1.81#199 · wins above average
Playoff chance<0.1%out of the picture
Trendrating by week

Who to root for this week

Nothing this weekend moves the needle.

Nothing this weekend moves the needle.

Best winMaryland (37–30)
Worst lossUMass (21–37)
Schedule faced+0.2 avg opponent
Schedule ahead+8.7 avg opponent
Roster talent#47 of 127 · worth +1.3, rated -5.7: short of it
Returning production44% of last year's · #59 of 128
Home field+2.5 pts · 103rd of 131

How this rating is built

Power = w × (average margin counted + average opponent rating) + (1 − w) × preseason prior, where w = games ÷ (games + 4). After 9 games, w is 69%, so the preseason prior is 31% of this rating. Every game played shrinks that share.

PartValueWeightAdds
Margin counted-10.1 avg× 69%-6.9
Opponents faced+0.2 avg× 69%+0.1
Preseason prior+3.6× 31%+1.1
Power-5.7

This explains how the model reached the number. The opponent ratings come out of the same fitted model, so it is not independent proof that the rating is right.

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the result against expectation. Adds is a different question: how many points of Power the game contributes, counting its margin and the strength of the opponent together. A game can beat expectation and still add little, or the reverse. Adds, plus the preseason prior, sum to Power (figures are rounded so the column adds up). Hover an Adds figure for its arithmetic.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerfAdds
1 vs UMass L 21–37 +16.0 -32.0 -3.2
2 at Boston College L 21–28 -2.2 -4.8 -1.0
3 vs USC L 35–42 -20.2 +13.2 +0.4
4 vs Howard FCS W 58–7 +31.0 +20.0 +0.1
5 vs Indiana L 15–47 -23.1 -8.9 -1.4
7 at Maryland W 37–30 -7.2 +14.2 +0.8
8 at Northwestern L 14–42 -20.8 -7.2 -1.4
9 vs Michigan L 21–28 -13.2 +6.2 -0.1
10 at Wisconsin L 10–31 -18.5 -2.5 -1.0
Preseason prior (31% of the rating)+1.1
Power-5.7

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
11 vs Nebraska -15.2 18%
12 at Penn State -20.3 11%
13 vs Michigan State -4.6 39%

Coaches

Mean added leaves out 1978–1980, the first seasons rated, which have no preseason prior to measure against.

CoachYearsRecordMean added
Frank Burns1978–198337-30-6.0
Dick Anderson1984–198927-34-4+0.1
Doug Graber1990–199529-36-1-1.7
Terry Shea1996–200011-44-6.8
Greg Schiano2001–201168-67+0.5
Kyle Flood2012–201527-24-2.5
Chris Ash2016–20198-32-6.3
Greg Schiano2020–202633-48-0.5

Season by season

Best finish: #14 in 2006. 48 seasons rated. The two columns' numbers are not comparable; the rank within each is. Season links open that year's game log.

25 1 150 2003 (MRI Classic): #75 of 117 (5-7)2004 (MRI Classic): #89 of 117 (4-7)2005 (MRI Classic): #59 of 119 (7-5)2006 (MRI Classic): #14 of 119 (11-2)2007 (MRI Classic): #28 of 120 (8-5)2008 (MRI Classic): #29 of 120 (8-5)2009 (MRI Classic): #30 of 120 (9-4)2010 (MRI Classic): #97 of 120 (4-8)2011 (MRI Classic): #38 of 120 (9-4)2012 (MRI Classic): #44 of 124 (9-4)2013 (MRI Classic): #89 of 126 (6-7)2014 (MRI Classic): #71 of 128 (8-5)2015 (MRI Classic): #96 of 128 (4-8)2016 (MRI Classic): #123 of 128 (2-10)2017 (MRI Classic): #107 of 130 (4-8)2018 (MRI Classic): #124 of 130 (1-11)2019 (MRI Classic): #124 of 130 (2-10)1978 (MRI 2.0): #34 of 138 (9-3)1979 (MRI 2.0): #40 of 138 (8-3)1980 (MRI 2.0): #34 of 138 (7-4)1981 (MRI 2.0): #63 of 136 (5-6)1982 (MRI 2.0): #76 of 105 (5-6)1983 (MRI 2.0): #84 of 105 (3-8)1984 (MRI 2.0): #52 of 106 (7-3)1985 (MRI 2.0): #70 of 106 (2-9)1986 (MRI 2.0): #46 of 105 (5-6)1987 (MRI 2.0): #51 of 104 (6-5)1988 (MRI 2.0): #44 of 104 (5-6)1989 (MRI 2.0): #69 of 106 (2-9)1990 (MRI 2.0): #84 of 107 (3-8)1991 (MRI 2.0): #67 of 107 (6-5)1992 (MRI 2.0): #51 of 107 (7-4)1993 (MRI 2.0): #64 of 106 (4-7)1994 (MRI 2.0): #67 of 107 (5-6)1995 (MRI 2.0): #74 of 108 (4-7)1996 (MRI 2.0): #94 of 111 (2-9)1997 (MRI 2.0): #107 of 112 (0-11)1998 (MRI 2.0): #101 of 112 (5-6)1999 (MRI 2.0): #108 of 114 (1-10)2000 (MRI 2.0): #100 of 116 (3-8)2001 (MRI 2.0): #108 of 117 (2-9)2002 (MRI 2.0): #108 of 117 (1-11)2003 (MRI 2.0): #77 of 117 (5-7)2004 (MRI 2.0): #88 of 117 (4-7)2005 (MRI 2.0): #67 of 119 (7-5)2006 (MRI 2.0): #21 of 119 (11-2)2007 (MRI 2.0): #30 of 119 (8-5)2008 (MRI 2.0): #29 of 120 (8-5)2009 (MRI 2.0): #38 of 120 (9-4)2010 (MRI 2.0): #77 of 120 (4-8)2011 (MRI 2.0): #47 of 120 (9-4)2012 (MRI 2.0): #50 of 124 (9-4)2013 (MRI 2.0): #79 of 125 (6-7)2014 (MRI 2.0): #64 of 128 (8-5)2015 (MRI 2.0): #87 of 128 (4-8)2016 (MRI 2.0): #104 of 128 (2-10)2017 (MRI 2.0): #96 of 130 (4-8)2018 (MRI 2.0): #104 of 130 (1-11)2019 (MRI 2.0): #118 of 130 (2-10)2020 (MRI 2.0): #77 of 128 (3-6)2021 (MRI 2.0): #79 of 130 (5-8)2022 (MRI 2.0): #91 of 131 (4-8)2023 (MRI 2.0): #52 of 133 (7-6)2024 (MRI 2.0): #47 of 134 (7-6)2025 (MRI 2.0): #62 of 136 (5-7) MRI 2.0Classic 1978 2025

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 150 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Two lines where both ratings cover a season - MRI 2.0 in red, Classic in grey. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRec MRI 2.0MRI Classic
2025 5–7 #62 of 136 · 2.52 –
2024 7–6 #47 of 134 · 5.23 –
2023 7–6 #52 of 133 · 3.43 –
2022 4–8 #91 of 131 · -5.72 –
2021 5–8 #79 of 130 · -1.15 –
2020 3–6 #77 of 128 · -2.64 –
2019 2–10 #118 of 130 · -18.19 #124 of 130 · -57.57
2018 1–11 #104 of 130 · -13.46 #124 of 130 · -50.44
2017 4–8 #96 of 130 · -8.51 #107 of 130 · -16.57
2016 2–10 #104 of 128 · -12.49 #123 of 128 · -45.15
2015 4–8 #87 of 128 · -6.28 #96 of 128 · -7.19
2014 8–5 #64 of 128 · -0.49 #71 of 128 · 19.55
2013 6–7 #79 of 125 · -5.03 #89 of 126 · -5.00
2012 9–4 #50 of 124 · 5.09 #44 of 124 · 39.98
2011 9–4 #47 of 120 · 4.32 #38 of 120 · 42.50
2010 4–8 #77 of 120 · -5.37 #97 of 120 · -13.07
2009 9–4 #38 of 120 · 7.24 #30 of 120 · 47.41
2008 8–5 #29 of 120 · 8.68 #29 of 120 · 47.20
2007 8–5 #30 of 119 · 9.31 #28 of 120 · 54.35
2006 11–2 #21 of 119 · 12.23 #14 of 119 · 80.58
2005 7–5 #67 of 119 · -1.21 #59 of 119 · 28.78
2004 4–7 #88 of 117 · -9.72 #89 of 117 · -2.04
2003 5–7 #77 of 117 · -6.43 #75 of 117 · 13.93
2002 1–11 #108 of 117 · -19.36 –
2001 2–9 #108 of 117 · -19.76 –
2000 3–8 #100 of 116 · -16.69 –
1999 1–10 #108 of 114 · -19.45 –
1998 5–6 #101 of 112 · -16.88 –
1997 0–11 #107 of 112 · -24.42 –
1996 2–9 #94 of 111 · -14.54 –
1995 4–7 #74 of 108 · -7.19 –
1994 5–6 #67 of 107 · -2.41 –
1993 4–7 #64 of 106 · -3.84 –
1992 7–4 #51 of 107 · 0.37 –
1991 6–5 #67 of 107 · -5.12 –
1990 3–8 #84 of 107 · -11.59 –
1989 2–9 #69 of 106 · -6.29 –
1988 5–6 #44 of 104 · 2.06 –
1987 6–5 #51 of 104 · -0.95 –
1986 5–6 #46 of 105 · 2.11 –
1985 2–9 #70 of 106 · -5.93 –
1984 7–3 #52 of 106 · 1.00 –
1983 3–8 #84 of 105 · -9.64 –
1982 5–6 #76 of 105 · -6.45 –
1981 5–6 #63 of 136 · 0.10 –
1980 7–4 #34 of 138 · 8.68 –
1979 8–3 #40 of 138 · 6.03 –
1978 9–3 #34 of 138 · 7.52 –