The MRI
2026 · Week 11

Indiana

Big Ten · 8–1 · 5–1 in conference · MRI Classic #9

Power+20.4#12 of 138
Résumé+3.99#9 · wins above average
Playoff chance63%#9 most likely · -0.5 pts this week
Trendrating by week

Who to root for this week

5 games · top: Michigan over Oregon, +4.0 pts playoff odds

The games this week that move its playoff odds most, and the side to cheer. Other teams’ games only; its own game is in the schedule below. How these are worked out.

Best winNebraska (20–17)
Worst lossOhio State (15–19)
Schedule faced+0.8 avg opponent
Schedule ahead+8.7 avg opponent
Roster talent#37 of 127 · worth +2.7, rated +20.4: beating it
Returning production17% of last year's · #99 of 128 · counted against its preseason rating
Home field+2.7 pts · 92nd of 131

How this rating is built

Power = w × (average margin counted + average opponent rating) + (1 − w) × preseason prior, where w = games ÷ (games + 4). After 9 games, w is 69%, so the preseason prior is 31% of this rating. Every game played shrinks that share.

PartValueWeightAdds
Margin counted+19.9 avg× 69%+13.8
Opponents faced+0.8 avg× 69%+0.6
Preseason prior+19.5× 31%+6.0
Power+20.4

This explains how the model reached the number. The opponent ratings come out of the same fitted model, so it is not independent proof that the rating is right.

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the result against expectation. Adds is a different question: how many points of Power the game contributes, counting its margin and the strength of the opponent together. A game can beat expectation and still add little, or the reverse. Adds, plus the preseason prior, sum to Power (figures are rounded so the column adds up). Hover an Adds figure for its arithmetic.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerfAdds
1 vs North Texas W 52–16 +20.3 +15.7 +3.0
2 vs Howard FCS W 55–0 +57.1 -2.1 +0.2
3 vs Western Kentucky W 38–0 +36.7 +1.3 +1.9
4 vs Northwestern W 29–23 +11.3 -5.3 +1.3
5 at Rutgers W 47–15 +23.1 +8.9 +2.5
6 at Nebraska W 20–17 +4.8 -1.8 +1.5
7 vs Ohio State L 15–19 -3.4 -0.6 +1.4
8 at Michigan W 13–6 +6.8 +0.2 +1.8
9 vs Minnesota W 23–16 +20.0 -13.0 +0.8
Preseason prior (31% of the rating)+6.0
Power+20.4

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
11 vs USC +5.9 64%
12 at Washington +8.9 70%
13 vs Purdue +23.1 92%

Coaches

Mean added leaves out 1978–1980, the first seasons rated, which have no preseason prior to measure against.

CoachYearsRecordMean added
Lee Corso1978–198226-30-3.9
Sam Wyche19833-8-6.7
Bill Mallory1984–199668-78-3+1.4
Cam Cameron1997–200118-37-0.3
Gerry DiNardo2002–20048-27-6.4
Terry Hoeppner2005–20069-14-2.9
Bill Lynch2007–201019-30-2.4
Kevin Wilson2011–201626-47-0.7
Tom Allen2017–202333-48+0.3
Curt Cignetti2024–202635-3+17.5

Season by season

Best finish: #2 in 2025. 48 seasons rated. The two columns' numbers are not comparable; the rank within each is. Season links open that year's game log.

25 1 150 2003 (MRI Classic): #106 of 117 (2-10)2004 (MRI Classic): #97 of 117 (3-8)2005 (MRI Classic): #96 of 119 (4-7)2006 (MRI Classic): #88 of 119 (5-7)2007 (MRI Classic): #65 of 120 (7-6)2008 (MRI Classic): #112 of 120 (3-9)2009 (MRI Classic): #97 of 120 (4-8)2010 (MRI Classic): #87 of 120 (5-7)2011 (MRI Classic): #108 of 120 (1-11)2012 (MRI Classic): #93 of 124 (4-8)2013 (MRI Classic): #73 of 126 (5-7)2014 (MRI Classic): #96 of 128 (4-8)2015 (MRI Classic): #69 of 128 (6-7)2016 (MRI Classic): #58 of 128 (6-7)2017 (MRI Classic): #55 of 130 (5-7)2018 (MRI Classic): #72 of 130 (5-7)2019 (MRI Classic): #34 of 130 (8-5)1978 (MRI 2.0): #94 of 138 (4-7)1979 (MRI 2.0): #51 of 138 (8-4)1980 (MRI 2.0): #54 of 138 (6-5)1981 (MRI 2.0): #98 of 136 (3-8)1982 (MRI 2.0): #62 of 105 (5-6)1983 (MRI 2.0): #83 of 105 (3-8)1984 (MRI 2.0): #86 of 106 (0-11)1985 (MRI 2.0): #74 of 106 (4-7)1986 (MRI 2.0): #45 of 105 (6-6)1987 (MRI 2.0): #34 of 104 (8-4)1988 (MRI 2.0): #20 of 104 (8-4)1989 (MRI 2.0): #37 of 106 (5-6)1990 (MRI 2.0): #31 of 107 (6-6)1991 (MRI 2.0): #27 of 107 (7-5)1992 (MRI 2.0): #45 of 107 (5-6)1993 (MRI 2.0): #35 of 106 (8-4)1994 (MRI 2.0): #37 of 107 (6-5)1995 (MRI 2.0): #67 of 108 (2-9)1996 (MRI 2.0): #51 of 111 (3-8)1997 (MRI 2.0): #82 of 112 (2-9)1998 (MRI 2.0): #60 of 112 (4-7)1999 (MRI 2.0): #69 of 114 (4-7)2000 (MRI 2.0): #69 of 116 (3-8)2001 (MRI 2.0): #52 of 117 (5-6)2002 (MRI 2.0): #91 of 117 (3-9)2003 (MRI 2.0): #100 of 117 (2-10)2004 (MRI 2.0): #81 of 117 (3-8)2005 (MRI 2.0): #86 of 119 (4-7)2006 (MRI 2.0): #87 of 119 (5-7)2007 (MRI 2.0): #66 of 119 (7-6)2008 (MRI 2.0): #101 of 120 (3-9)2009 (MRI 2.0): #89 of 120 (4-8)2010 (MRI 2.0): #90 of 120 (5-7)2011 (MRI 2.0): #105 of 120 (1-11)2012 (MRI 2.0): #89 of 124 (4-8)2013 (MRI 2.0): #64 of 125 (5-7)2014 (MRI 2.0): #81 of 128 (4-8)2015 (MRI 2.0): #76 of 128 (6-7)2016 (MRI 2.0): #66 of 128 (6-7)2017 (MRI 2.0): #54 of 130 (5-7)2018 (MRI 2.0): #61 of 130 (5-7)2019 (MRI 2.0): #40 of 130 (8-5)2020 (MRI 2.0): #15 of 128 (6-2)2021 (MRI 2.0): #86 of 130 (2-10)2022 (MRI 2.0): #80 of 131 (4-8)2023 (MRI 2.0): #80 of 133 (3-9)2024 (MRI 2.0): #10 of 134 (11-2)2025 (MRI 2.0): #2 of 136 (16-0) MRI 2.0Classic 1978 2025

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 150 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Two lines where both ratings cover a season - MRI 2.0 in red, Classic in grey. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRec MRI 2.0MRI Classic
2025 16–0 #2 of 136 · 30.43 –
2024 11–2 #10 of 134 · 17.75 –
2023 3–9 #80 of 133 · -3.32 –
2022 4–8 #80 of 131 · -3.44 –
2021 2–10 #86 of 130 · -2.76 –
2020 6–2 #15 of 128 · 15.22 –
2019 8–5 #40 of 130 · 6.98 #34 of 130 · 41.44
2018 5–7 #61 of 130 · 1.88 #72 of 130 · 20.27
2017 5–7 #54 of 130 · 3.32 #55 of 130 · 29.40
2016 6–7 #66 of 128 · -0.37 #58 of 128 · 26.14
2015 6–7 #76 of 128 · -1.46 #69 of 128 · 21.28
2014 4–8 #81 of 128 · -5.36 #96 of 128 · -7.24
2013 5–7 #64 of 125 · 0.38 #73 of 126 · 18.37
2012 4–8 #89 of 124 · -8.28 #93 of 124 · -5.84
2011 1–11 #105 of 120 · -14.46 #108 of 120 · -36.50
2010 5–7 #90 of 120 · -8.74 #87 of 120 · -1.97
2009 4–8 #89 of 120 · -8.35 #97 of 120 · -5.95
2008 3–9 #101 of 120 · -12.67 #112 of 120 · -43.94
2007 7–6 #66 of 119 · -0.79 #65 of 120 · 23.52
2006 5–7 #87 of 119 · -8.13 #88 of 119 · -0.42
2005 4–7 #86 of 119 · -8.37 #96 of 119 · -11.52
2004 3–8 #81 of 117 · -7.52 #97 of 117 · -8.99
2003 2–10 #100 of 117 · -14.22 #106 of 117 · -33.88
2002 3–9 #91 of 117 · -10.45 –
2001 5–6 #52 of 117 · 4.26 –
2000 3–8 #69 of 116 · -2.52 –
1999 4–7 #69 of 114 · -3.38 –
1998 4–7 #60 of 112 · -1.45 –
1997 2–9 #82 of 112 · -8.72 –
1996 3–8 #51 of 111 · 1.33 –
1995 2–9 #67 of 108 · -4.19 –
1994 6–5 #37 of 107 · 5.06 –
1993 8–4 #35 of 106 · 5.67 –
1992 5–6 #45 of 107 · 1.51 –
1991 7–5 #27 of 107 · 9.32 –
1990 6–6 #31 of 107 · 7.25 –
1989 5–6 #37 of 106 · 5.86 –
1988 8–4 #20 of 104 · 13.83 –
1987 8–4 #34 of 104 · 6.98 –
1986 6–6 #45 of 105 · 2.50 –
1985 4–7 #74 of 106 · -7.77 –
1984 0–11 #86 of 106 · -9.84 –
1983 3–8 #83 of 105 · -9.46 –
1982 5–6 #62 of 105 · -3.66 –
1981 3–8 #98 of 136 · -7.26 –
1980 6–5 #54 of 138 · 1.95 –
1979 8–4 #51 of 138 · 3.15 –
1978 4–7 #94 of 138 · -5.03 –