The MRI
2026 · Week 2
MRI Champion · 1 football title 2004

USC

Big Ten · 3–0 · MRI Classic #5

Power+18.6#17 of 138
Résumé+0.64#20 · wins above average
Movement-2down from #15 last week
Best winFresno State (39–0)
Schedule faced-6.7 avg opponent
Schedule ahead+14.0 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 vs Fresno State W 39–0 +23.2 +15.8
1 vs San Jose State W 42–26 +35.0 -19.0
2 vs Louisiana W 49–30 +30.4 -11.4

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
3 at Rutgers +23.2 92%
4 vs Oregon +2.7 56%
5 vs Washington +10.5 74%
6 at Penn State -7.7 32%
8 at Wisconsin +14.4 81%
9 vs Ohio State -9.9 27%
11 at Indiana -20.2 11%
12 vs Maryland +15.3 82%

Season by season

Best finish: #1 in 2004. 23 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 100 2003: #2 of 117 (12-1)2004: #1 of 117 (13-0)2005: #2 of 119 (12-1)2006: #7 of 119 (11-2)2007: #4 of 120 (11-2)2008: #2 of 120 (12-1)2009: #27 of 120 (9-4)2010: #42 of 120 (8-5)2011: #15 of 120 (10-2)2012: #43 of 124 (7-6)2013: #24 of 126 (10-4)2014: #15 of 128 (9-4)2015: #25 of 128 (8-6)2016: #11 of 128 (10-3)2017: #14 of 130 (11-2)2018: #78 of 130 (5-7)2019: #35 of 130 (8-5)2020: #25 of 128 (5-1)2021: #67 of 130 (4-8)2022: #19 of 131 (11-3)2023: #20 of 133 (8-5)2024: #18 of 134 (7-6)2025: #14 of 136 (9-4) 2003 2025

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 100 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025 14 of 136 9–4 19.06 Power
2024 18 of 134 7–6 15.63 Power
2023 20 of 133 8–5 12.02 Power
2022 19 of 131 11–3 13.68 Power
2021 67 of 130 4–8 1.50 Power
2020 25 of 128 5–1 10.94 Power
2019 35 of 130 8–5 40.60 MRI
2018 78 of 130 5–7 15.91 MRI
2017 14 of 130 11–2 72.73 MRI
2016 11 of 128 10–3 74.77 MRI
2015 25 of 128 8–6 64.61 MRI
2014 15 of 128 9–4 67.47 MRI
2013 24 of 126 10–4 63.29 MRI
2012 43 of 124 7–6 41.31 MRI
2011 15 of 120 10–2 67.80 MRI
2010 42 of 120 8–5 42.53 MRI
2009 27 of 120 9–4 50.90 MRI
2008 2 of 120 12–1 130.36 MRI
2007 4 of 120 11–2 105.26 MRI
2006 7 of 119 11–2 102.08 MRI
2005 2 of 119 12–1 136.77 MRI
2004 1 of 117 13–0 151.53 MRI
2003 2 of 117 12–1 128.72 MRI