Wake Forest
ACC · 8–1 · 5–1 in conference · MRI Classic #11
Who to root for this week
The games this week that move its playoff odds most, and the side to cheer. Other teams’ games only; its own game is in the schedule below. How these are worked out.
-
Louisvilleat
North Carolina
Playoff odds21% if they win · 19% if not +2.1 pts -
Tennesseeat
Texas A&M
Playoff odds20% if they win · 19% if not +0.9 pts -
Michiganat
Oregon
Playoff odds20% if they win · 19% if not +0.8 pts -
Ole Missat
Oklahoma
Playoff odds20% if they win · 19% if not +0.8 pts -
Purdueat
Iowa
Playoff odds20% if they win · 19% if not +0.8 pts
How this rating is built
Power = w × (average margin counted + average opponent rating) + (1 − w) × preseason prior, where w = games ÷ (games + 4). After 9 games, w is 69%, so the preseason prior is 31% of this rating. Every game played shrinks that share.
| Part | Value | Weight | Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| Margin counted | +24.8 avg | × 69% | +17.2 |
| Opponents faced | -4.3 avg | × 69% | -3.0 |
| Preseason prior | -0.9 | × 31% | -0.3 |
| Power | +13.9 | ||
This explains how the model reached the number. The opponent ratings come out of the same fitted model, so it is not independent proof that the rating is right.
Results
Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the result against expectation. Adds is a different question: how many points of Power the game contributes, counting its margin and the strength of the opponent together. A game can beat expectation and still add little, or the reverse. Adds, plus the preseason prior, sum to Power (figures are rounded so the column adds up). Hover an Adds figure for its arithmetic.
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Expected | Perf | Adds | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | vs | Akron | W 38–16 | +39.7 | -17.7 | +0.1 |
| 2 | at | Purdue | W 38–36 | +10.6 | -8.6 | +0.5 |
| 3 | vs | Miami (FL) | L 20–33 | -9.3 | -3.7 | +0.5 |
| 4 | at | Louisville | W 30–27 | -3.0 | +6.0 | +1.6 |
| 5 | vs | Stanford | W 57–3 | +26.2 | +27.8 | +2.7 |
| 6 | at | NC State | W 38–14 | +12.1 | +11.9 | +2.4 |
| 7 | at | California | W 41–7 | +18.5 | +15.5 | +2.5 |
| 9 | vs | Virginia | W 51–7 | +16.7 | +27.3 | +3.1 |
| 10 | vs | Merrimack FCS | W 77–0 | +50.6 | +26.4 | +0.8 |
| Preseason prior (31% of the rating) | -0.3 | |||||
| Power | +13.9 | |||||
Remaining schedule
| Wk | Opponent | Projected | Win prob | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | at | SMU | -0.4 | 49% |
| 12 | at | Georgia Tech | +17.7 | 86% |
| 13 | vs | Duke | +7.0 | 66% |
Coaches
Mean added leaves out 1978–1980, the first seasons rated, which have no preseason prior to measure against.
| Coach | Years | Record | Mean added |
|---|---|---|---|
| John Mackovic | 1978–1980 | 14-20 | – |
| Al Groh | 1981–1986 | 26-40 | -2.7 |
| Bill Dooley | 1987–1992 | 29-36-2 | -1.5 |
| Jim Caldwell | 1993–2000 | 26-63 | -4.2 |
| Jim Grobe | 2001–2013 | 77-82 | +0.2 |
| Dave Clawson | 2014–2024 | 67-69 | +0.9 |
| Jake Dickert | 2025–2026 | 17-5 | +5.9 |
Season by season
Best finish: #20 in 2021. 48 seasons rated. The two columns' numbers are not comparable; the rank within each is. Season links open that year's game log.
Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 150 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Two lines where both ratings cover a season - MRI 2.0 in red, Classic in grey. Hover a point for the season.
| Season | Rec | MRI 2.0 | MRI Classic |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 9–4 | #65 of 136 · 2.11 | – |
| 2024 | 4–8 | #93 of 134 · -5.76 | – |
| 2023 | 4–8 | #71 of 133 · -2.18 | – |
| 2022 | 8–5 | #29 of 131 · 10.34 | – |
| 2021 | 11–3 | #20 of 130 · 12.95 | – |
| 2020 | 4–5 | #50 of 128 · 3.70 | – |
| 2019 | 8–5 | #49 of 130 · 3.35 | #48 of 130 · 30.31 |
| 2018 | 7–6 | #53 of 130 · 3.47 | #77 of 130 · 16.14 |
| 2017 | 8–5 | #29 of 130 · 10.10 | #41 of 130 · 41.33 |
| 2016 | 7–6 | #71 of 128 · -2.49 | #67 of 128 · 17.58 |
| 2015 | 3–9 | #89 of 128 · -6.67 | #100 of 128 · -11.91 |
| 2014 | 3–9 | #92 of 128 · -10.08 | #114 of 128 · -26.66 |
| 2013 | 4–8 | #78 of 125 · -5.02 | #81 of 126 · 9.13 |
| 2012 | 5–7 | #95 of 124 · -10.57 | #97 of 124 · -14.10 |
| 2011 | 6–7 | #72 of 120 · -2.41 | #87 of 120 · 1.30 |
| 2010 | 3–9 | #80 of 120 · -6.70 | #103 of 120 · -26.10 |
| 2009 | 5–7 | #52 of 120 · 2.72 | #75 of 120 · 12.38 |
| 2008 | 8–5 | #36 of 120 · 6.14 | #38 of 120 · 43.56 |
| 2007 | 9–4 | #39 of 119 · 7.34 | #36 of 120 · 50.55 |
| 2006 | 11–3 | #39 of 119 · 6.68 | #27 of 119 · 57.31 |
| 2005 | 4–7 | #65 of 119 · -0.25 | #83 of 119 · 11.50 |
| 2004 | 4–7 | #55 of 117 · 1.27 | #75 of 117 · 14.41 |
| 2003 | 5–7 | #49 of 117 · 3.48 | #72 of 117 · 20.09 |
| 2002 | 7–6 | #55 of 117 · 3.21 | – |
| 2001 | 6–5 | #76 of 117 · -3.71 | – |
| 2000 | 2–9 | #94 of 116 · -12.61 | – |
| 1999 | 7–5 | #50 of 114 · 2.78 | – |
| 1998 | 3–8 | #76 of 112 · -6.56 | – |
| 1997 | 5–6 | #73 of 112 · -4.32 | – |
| 1996 | 3–8 | #98 of 111 · -18.95 | – |
| 1995 | 1–10 | #97 of 108 · -17.42 | – |
| 1994 | 3–8 | #97 of 107 · -18.05 | – |
| 1993 | 2–9 | #82 of 106 · -9.04 | – |
| 1992 | 8–4 | #56 of 107 · -0.69 | – |
| 1991 | 3–8 | #90 of 107 · -13.28 | – |
| 1990 | 3–8 | #79 of 107 · -9.56 | – |
| 1989 | 2–9 | #77 of 106 · -9.73 | – |
| 1988 | 6–5 | #52 of 104 · 0.09 | – |
| 1987 | 7–4 | #52 of 104 · -1.42 | – |
| 1986 | 5–6 | #62 of 105 · -2.68 | – |
| 1985 | 4–7 | #71 of 106 · -6.15 | – |
| 1984 | 6–5 | #74 of 106 · -5.37 | – |
| 1983 | 4–7 | #77 of 105 · -6.71 | – |
| 1982 | 3–8 | #82 of 105 · -9.13 | – |
| 1981 | 4–7 | #85 of 136 · -3.72 | – |
| 1980 | 5–6 | #41 of 138 · 5.76 | – |
| 1979 | 8–4 | #67 of 138 · -0.19 | – |
| 1978 | 1–10 | #123 of 138 · -12.91 | – |