The MRI
2026 · Week 11

Louisville

ACC · 6–3 · 5–2 in conference · MRI Classic #32

Power+13.9#24 of 138
Résumé+1.78#33 · wins above average
Playoff chance4.9%#27 most likely · -0.2 pts this week
Trendrating by week

Who to root for this week

1 game · top: SMU over Wake Forest, +2.3 pts playoff odds

The games this week that move its playoff odds most, and the side to cheer. Other teams’ games only; its own game is in the schedule below. How these are worked out.

Best winSMU (41–31)
Worst lossNC State (28–31)
Schedule faced-0.1 avg opponent
Schedule ahead+8.0 avg opponent
HeismanLincoln Kienholz · 1.0% to win
Roster talent#36 of 127 · worth +3.0, rated +13.9: beating it
Returning production35% of last year's · #78 of 128
Home field+3.4 pts · 26th of 131

How this rating is built

Power = w × (average margin counted + average opponent rating) + (1 − w) × preseason prior, where w = games ÷ (games + 4). After 9 games, w is 69%, so the preseason prior is 31% of this rating. Every game played shrinks that share.

PartValueWeightAdds
Margin counted+16.0 avg× 69%+11.1
Opponents faced-0.1 avg× 69%-0.1
Preseason prior+9.3× 31%+2.9
Power+13.9

This explains how the model reached the number. The opponent ratings come out of the same fitted model, so it is not independent proof that the rating is right.

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the result against expectation. Adds is a different question: how many points of Power the game contributes, counting its margin and the strength of the opponent together. A game can beat expectation and still add little, or the reverse. Adds, plus the preseason prior, sum to Power (figures are rounded so the column adds up). Hover an Adds figure for its arithmetic.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerfAdds
1 N Ole Miss L 38–41 -7.6 +4.6 +1.3
2 vs Villanova FCS W 59–13 +50.6 -4.6 +0.4
3 vs SMU W 41–31 +5.6 +4.4 +1.7
4 vs Wake Forest L 27–30 +3.0 -6.0 +0.5
5 at NC State L 28–31 +12.0 -15.0 -0.2
6 vs Florida State W 44–20 +10.2 +13.8 +2.5
7 at Syracuse W 34–26 +11.6 -3.6 +1.0
9 vs Stanford W 52–24 +26.2 +1.8 +1.6
10 at Georgia Tech W 44–17 +17.7 +9.3 +2.2
Preseason prior (31% of the rating)+2.9
Power+13.9

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
11 at North Carolina +4.6 61%
12 vs Pittsburgh +10.4 74%
13 at Kentucky -0.4 49%

Coaches

Mean added leaves out 1978–1980, the first seasons rated, which have no preseason prior to measure against.

CoachYearsRecordMean added
Vince Gibson1978–197911-10-1–
Bob Weber1980–198420-35-6.1
Howard Schnellenberger1985–199454-56-2-0.6
Ron Cooper1995–199713-20-4.5
John Smith1998–200241-21+3.4
Bobby Petrino2003–200641-9+7.7
Steve Kragthorpe2007–200915-21-6.8
Charlie Strong2010–201337-15+5.2
Bobby Petrino2014–201836-26-1.1
Scott Satterfield2019–202225-24+4.2
Jeff Brohm2023–202634-15+6.9

Season by season

Best finish: #3 in 2006. 48 seasons rated. The two columns' numbers are not comparable; the rank within each is. Season links open that year's game log.

25 1 150 2003 (MRI Classic): #43 of 117 (9-4)2004 (MRI Classic): #3 of 117 (11-1)2005 (MRI Classic): #12 of 119 (9-3)2006 (MRI Classic): #4 of 119 (12-1)2007 (MRI Classic): #53 of 120 (6-6)2008 (MRI Classic): #89 of 120 (5-7)2009 (MRI Classic): #90 of 120 (4-8)2010 (MRI Classic): #43 of 120 (7-6)2011 (MRI Classic): #60 of 120 (7-6)2012 (MRI Classic): #31 of 124 (11-2)2013 (MRI Classic): #6 of 126 (12-1)2014 (MRI Classic): #27 of 128 (9-4)2015 (MRI Classic): #51 of 128 (8-5)2016 (MRI Classic): #7 of 128 (9-4)2017 (MRI Classic): #32 of 130 (8-5)2018 (MRI Classic): #125 of 130 (2-10)2019 (MRI Classic): #65 of 130 (8-5)1978 (MRI 2.0): #37 of 138 (7-4)1979 (MRI 2.0): #64 of 138 (4-7)1980 (MRI 2.0): #67 of 138 (5-6)1981 (MRI 2.0): #82 of 136 (5-6)1982 (MRI 2.0): #85 of 105 (5-6)1983 (MRI 2.0): #91 of 105 (3-8)1984 (MRI 2.0): #99 of 106 (2-9)1985 (MRI 2.0): #104 of 106 (2-9)1986 (MRI 2.0): #100 of 105 (3-8)1987 (MRI 2.0): #97 of 104 (3-8)1988 (MRI 2.0): #73 of 104 (8-3)1989 (MRI 2.0): #51 of 106 (6-5)1990 (MRI 2.0): #33 of 107 (10-2)1991 (MRI 2.0): #87 of 107 (2-9)1992 (MRI 2.0): #61 of 107 (5-6)1993 (MRI 2.0): #25 of 106 (9-3)1994 (MRI 2.0): #55 of 107 (6-5)1995 (MRI 2.0): #48 of 108 (7-4)1996 (MRI 2.0): #56 of 111 (5-6)1997 (MRI 2.0): #90 of 112 (1-10)1998 (MRI 2.0): #68 of 112 (7-5)1999 (MRI 2.0): #54 of 114 (7-5)2000 (MRI 2.0): #33 of 116 (9-3)2001 (MRI 2.0): #27 of 117 (11-2)2002 (MRI 2.0): #49 of 117 (7-6)2003 (MRI 2.0): #54 of 117 (9-4)2004 (MRI 2.0): #8 of 117 (11-1)2005 (MRI 2.0): #7 of 119 (9-3)2006 (MRI 2.0): #3 of 119 (12-1)2007 (MRI 2.0): #28 of 119 (6-6)2008 (MRI 2.0): #70 of 120 (5-7)2009 (MRI 2.0): #83 of 120 (4-8)2010 (MRI 2.0): #58 of 120 (7-6)2011 (MRI 2.0): #59 of 120 (7-6)2012 (MRI 2.0): #49 of 124 (11-2)2013 (MRI 2.0): #23 of 125 (12-1)2014 (MRI 2.0): #27 of 128 (9-4)2015 (MRI 2.0): #37 of 128 (8-5)2016 (MRI 2.0): #11 of 128 (9-4)2017 (MRI 2.0): #22 of 130 (8-5)2018 (MRI 2.0): #100 of 130 (2-10)2019 (MRI 2.0): #61 of 130 (8-5)2020 (MRI 2.0): #46 of 128 (4-7)2021 (MRI 2.0): #46 of 130 (6-7)2022 (MRI 2.0): #22 of 131 (8-5)2023 (MRI 2.0): #23 of 133 (10-4)2024 (MRI 2.0): #20 of 134 (9-4)2025 (MRI 2.0): #26 of 136 (9-4) MRI 2.0Classic 1978 2025

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 150 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Two lines where both ratings cover a season - MRI 2.0 in red, Classic in grey. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRec MRI 2.0MRI Classic
2025 9–4 #26 of 136 · 11.22 –
2024 9–4 #20 of 134 · 14.63 –
2023 10–4 #23 of 133 · 11.21 –
2022 8–5 #22 of 131 · 12.32 –
2021 6–7 #46 of 130 · 6.15 –
2020 4–7 #46 of 128 · 4.35 –
2019 8–5 #61 of 130 · 0.52 #65 of 130 · 14.59
2018 2–10 #100 of 130 · -10.63 #125 of 130 · -51.84
2017 8–5 #22 of 130 · 13.89 #32 of 130 · 54.81
2016 9–4 #11 of 128 · 17.17 #7 of 128 · 84.00
2015 8–5 #37 of 128 · 9.30 #51 of 128 · 38.62
2014 9–4 #27 of 128 · 13.12 #27 of 128 · 54.24
2013 12–1 #23 of 125 · 14.29 #6 of 126 · 91.57
2012 11–2 #49 of 124 · 5.20 #31 of 124 · 52.47
2011 7–6 #59 of 120 · 1.48 #60 of 120 · 25.86
2010 7–6 #58 of 120 · 2.16 #43 of 120 · 35.72
2009 4–8 #83 of 120 · -6.25 #90 of 120 · -2.74
2008 5–7 #70 of 120 · -3.27 #89 of 120 · -2.39
2007 6–6 #28 of 119 · 9.55 #53 of 120 · 32.33
2006 12–1 #3 of 119 · 22.54 #4 of 119 · 107.69
2005 9–3 #7 of 119 · 18.87 #12 of 119 · 80.23
2004 11–1 #8 of 117 · 20.51 #3 of 117 · 121.95
2003 9–4 #54 of 117 · 2.61 #43 of 117 · 45.02
2002 7–6 #49 of 117 · 4.03 –
2001 11–2 #27 of 117 · 10.11 –
2000 9–3 #33 of 116 · 7.50 –
1999 7–5 #54 of 114 · 1.53 –
1998 7–5 #68 of 112 · -4.11 –
1997 1–10 #90 of 112 · -12.84 –
1996 5–6 #56 of 111 · 0.11 –
1995 7–4 #48 of 108 · 3.00 –
1994 6–5 #55 of 107 · 1.46 –
1993 9–3 #25 of 106 · 10.60 –
1992 5–6 #61 of 107 · -1.64 –
1991 2–9 #87 of 107 · -12.85 –
1990 10–2 #33 of 107 · 5.97 –
1989 6–5 #51 of 106 · 1.53 –
1988 8–3 #73 of 104 · -6.66 –
1987 3–8 #97 of 104 · -18.53 –
1986 3–8 #100 of 105 · -18.82 –
1985 2–9 #104 of 106 · -24.30 –
1984 2–9 #99 of 106 · -16.40 –
1983 3–8 #91 of 105 · -13.58 –
1982 5–6 #85 of 105 · -10.99 –
1981 5–6 #82 of 136 · -3.35 –
1980 5–6 #67 of 138 · -0.51 –
1979 4–7 #64 of 138 · -0.13 –
1978 7–4 #37 of 138 · 6.83 –