The MRI
2026 · Week 11

Akron

MAC · 1–9 · 0–6 in conference · MRI Classic #137

Power-22.8#132 of 138
Résumé-5.82#235 · wins above average
Playoff chance<0.1%out of the picture
Trendrating by week

Who to root for this week

Nothing this weekend moves the needle.

Nothing this weekend moves the needle.

Best winRobert Morris (45–10)
Worst lossKent State (20–35)
Schedule faced-9.8 avg opponent
Schedule ahead-16.7 avg opponent
Roster talent#115 of 127 · worth -7.3, rated -22.8: short of it
Returning production92% of last year's · #5 of 128
Home field+2.1 pts · 125th of 131

How this rating is built

Power = w × (average margin counted + average opponent rating) + (1 − w) × preseason prior, where w = games ÷ (games + 4). After 10 games, w is 71%, so the preseason prior is 29% of this rating. Every game played shrinks that share.

PartValueWeightAdds
Margin counted-17.9 avg× 71%-12.8
Opponents faced-9.8 avg× 71%-7.0
Preseason prior-10.5× 29%-3.0
Power-22.8

This explains how the model reached the number. The opponent ratings come out of the same fitted model, so it is not independent proof that the rating is right.

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the result against expectation. Adds is a different question: how many points of Power the game contributes, counting its margin and the strength of the opponent together. A game can beat expectation and still add little, or the reverse. Adds, plus the preseason prior, sum to Power (figures are rounded so the column adds up). Hover an Adds figure for its arithmetic.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerfAdds
1 at Wake Forest L 16–38 -39.7 +17.7 -0.7
2 vs Robert Morris FCS W 45–10 +13.9 +21.1 -0.6
3 at Minnesota L 7–41 -29.1 -4.9 -2.2
4 vs UNLV L 10–38 -13.6 -14.4 -3.0
5 at Central Michigan L 17–41 -14.5 -9.5 -2.7
6 vs Eastern Michigan L 23–25 -2.9 +0.9 -1.6
7 at Miami (OH) L 14–34 -16.3 -3.7 -2.3
8 at Kent State L 20–35 -5.0 -10.0 -2.7
10 vs Ohio L 20–28 -13.0 +5.0 -1.4
11 vs Western Michigan L 14–42 -19.2 -8.8 -2.6
Preseason prior (29% of the rating)-3.0
Power-22.8

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
12 at UMass -7.1 33%
13 vs Buffalo -5.1 38%

Coaches

CoachYearsRecordMean added
Gerry Faust1987–199436-49-3-6.0
Lee Owens1995–200340-61-3.0
J.D. Brookhart2004–200930-42-4.6
Rob Ianello2010–20112-22-13.5
Terry Bowden2012–201835-52-2.6
Tom Arth2019–20213-24-14.2
Joe Moorhead2022–202614-44-5.4

Season by season

Best finish: #58 in 2015. 39 seasons rated. The two columns' numbers are not comparable; the rank within each is. Season links open that year's game log.

25 1 150 2003 (MRI Classic): #62 of 117 (7-5)2004 (MRI Classic): #84 of 117 (6-5)2005 (MRI Classic): #78 of 119 (7-6)2006 (MRI Classic): #79 of 119 (5-7)2007 (MRI Classic): #96 of 120 (4-8)2008 (MRI Classic): #76 of 120 (5-7)2009 (MRI Classic): #110 of 120 (3-9)2010 (MRI Classic): #119 of 120 (1-11)2011 (MRI Classic): #120 of 120 (1-11)2012 (MRI Classic): #112 of 124 (1-11)2013 (MRI Classic): #85 of 126 (5-7)2014 (MRI Classic): #93 of 128 (5-7)2015 (MRI Classic): #58 of 128 (8-5)2016 (MRI Classic): #102 of 128 (5-7)2017 (MRI Classic): #99 of 130 (7-7)2018 (MRI Classic): #111 of 130 (4-8)2019 (MRI Classic): #129 of 130 (0-12)1987 (MRI 2.0): #101 of 104 (4-7)1988 (MRI 2.0): #90 of 104 (5-6)1989 (MRI 2.0): #81 of 106 (6-5)1990 (MRI 2.0): #86 of 107 (3-8)1991 (MRI 2.0): #96 of 107 (5-6)1992 (MRI 2.0): #90 of 107 (7-4)1993 (MRI 2.0): #94 of 106 (5-6)1994 (MRI 2.0): #107 of 107 (1-10)1995 (MRI 2.0): #106 of 108 (2-9)1996 (MRI 2.0): #103 of 111 (4-7)1997 (MRI 2.0): #105 of 112 (2-9)1998 (MRI 2.0): #97 of 112 (4-7)1999 (MRI 2.0): #94 of 114 (7-4)2000 (MRI 2.0): #86 of 116 (6-5)2001 (MRI 2.0): #90 of 117 (4-7)2002 (MRI 2.0): #96 of 117 (4-8)2003 (MRI 2.0): #79 of 117 (7-5)2004 (MRI 2.0): #92 of 117 (6-5)2005 (MRI 2.0): #84 of 119 (7-6)2006 (MRI 2.0): #94 of 119 (5-7)2007 (MRI 2.0): #100 of 119 (4-8)2008 (MRI 2.0): #92 of 120 (5-7)2009 (MRI 2.0): #109 of 120 (3-9)2010 (MRI 2.0): #118 of 120 (1-11)2011 (MRI 2.0): #120 of 120 (1-11)2012 (MRI 2.0): #120 of 124 (1-11)2013 (MRI 2.0): #112 of 125 (5-7)2014 (MRI 2.0): #106 of 128 (5-7)2015 (MRI 2.0): #88 of 128 (8-5)2016 (MRI 2.0): #97 of 128 (5-7)2017 (MRI 2.0): #100 of 130 (7-7)2018 (MRI 2.0): #106 of 130 (4-8)2019 (MRI 2.0): #129 of 130 (0-12)2020 (MRI 2.0): #125 of 128 (1-5)2021 (MRI 2.0): #127 of 130 (2-10)2022 (MRI 2.0): #127 of 131 (2-10)2023 (MRI 2.0): #131 of 133 (2-10)2024 (MRI 2.0): #123 of 134 (4-8)2025 (MRI 2.0): #125 of 136 (5-7) MRI 2.0Classic 1987 2025

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 150 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Two lines where both ratings cover a season - MRI 2.0 in red, Classic in grey. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRec MRI 2.0MRI Classic
2025 5–7 #125 of 136 · -18.00 –
2024 4–8 #123 of 134 · -16.74 –
2023 2–10 #131 of 133 · -21.47 –
2022 2–10 #127 of 131 · -19.59 –
2021 2–10 #127 of 130 · -26.36 –
2020 1–5 #125 of 128 · -29.59 –
2019 0–12 #129 of 130 · -32.82 #129 of 130 · -111.97
2018 4–8 #106 of 130 · -14.22 #111 of 130 · -29.68
2017 7–7 #100 of 130 · -9.94 #99 of 130 · -1.75
2016 5–7 #97 of 128 · -10.84 #102 of 128 · -14.18
2015 8–5 #88 of 128 · -6.62 #58 of 128 · 30.41
2014 5–7 #106 of 128 · -13.05 #93 of 128 · -4.16
2013 5–7 #112 of 125 · -17.37 #85 of 126 · -1.78
2012 1–11 #120 of 124 · -22.34 #112 of 124 · -32.58
2011 1–11 #120 of 120 · -29.85 #120 of 120 · -86.53
2010 1–11 #118 of 120 · -26.84 #119 of 120 · -72.11
2009 3–9 #109 of 120 · -16.20 #110 of 120 · -28.30
2008 5–7 #92 of 120 · -9.82 #76 of 120 · 11.69
2007 4–8 #100 of 119 · -14.11 #96 of 120 · -10.62
2006 5–7 #94 of 119 · -9.67 #79 of 119 · 6.11
2005 7–6 #84 of 119 · -8.17 #78 of 119 · 16.07
2004 6–5 #92 of 117 · -10.54 #84 of 117 · -0.05
2003 7–5 #79 of 117 · -7.32 #62 of 117 · 28.66
2002 4–8 #96 of 117 · -12.85 –
2001 4–7 #90 of 117 · -10.96 –
2000 6–5 #86 of 116 · -8.11 –
1999 7–4 #94 of 114 · -10.70 –
1998 4–7 #97 of 112 · -15.80 –
1997 2–9 #105 of 112 · -21.27 –
1996 4–7 #103 of 111 · -22.16 –
1995 2–9 #106 of 108 · -31.02 –
1994 1–10 #107 of 107 · -31.67 –
1993 5–6 #94 of 106 · -16.00 –
1992 7–4 #90 of 107 · -10.00 –
1991 5–6 #96 of 107 · -16.84 –
1990 3–8 #86 of 107 · -11.64 –
1989 6–5 #81 of 106 · -10.52 –
1988 5–6 #90 of 104 · -14.60 –
1987 4–7 #101 of 104 · -21.77 –