The MRI
2026 · Week 2

Western Michigan

MAC · 1–1 · MRI Classic #88

Power+2.5#57 of 138
Résumé-0.09#101 · wins above average
Movement+13up from #70 last week
Best winMonmouth (49–14)
Worst lossMichigan (12–13)
Schedule faced-11.1 avg opponent
Schedule ahead-13.0 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 at Michigan L 12–13 -14.3 +13.3
2 vs Monmouth FCS W 49–14 +41.4 -6.4

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
3 at Rice +15.4 82%
4 vs Boise State -4.2 40%
5 at Buffalo +16.2 84%
6 vs Kent State +31.5 97%
7 at Central Michigan +18.6 87%
8 at Toledo -5.1 38%
9 vs Bowling Green +27.8 95%
11 at Akron +16.4 84%

Season by season

Best finish: #6 in 2016. 23 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 150 2003: #83 of 117 (5-7)2004: #114 of 117 (1-10)2005: #79 of 119 (7-4)2006: #46 of 119 (8-5)2007: #78 of 120 (5-7)2008: #59 of 120 (9-4)2009: #106 of 120 (5-7)2010: #65 of 120 (6-6)2011: #63 of 120 (7-6)2012: #86 of 124 (4-8)2013: #115 of 126 (1-11)2014: #54 of 128 (8-5)2015: #46 of 128 (8-5)2016: #6 of 128 (13-1)2017: #59 of 130 (6-6)2018: #89 of 130 (7-6)2019: #54 of 130 (7-6)2020: #60 of 128 (4-2)2021: #65 of 130 (8-5)2022: #109 of 131 (5-7)2023: #116 of 133 (4-8)2024: #105 of 134 (6-7)2025: #77 of 136 (10-4) 2003 2025

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 150 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025 77 of 136 10–4 -2.45 Power
2024 105 of 134 6–7 -10.94 Power
2023 116 of 133 4–8 -14.25 Power
2022 109 of 131 5–7 -10.37 Power
2021 65 of 130 8–5 1.78 Power
2020 60 of 128 4–2 1.36 Power
2019 54 of 130 7–6 23.42 MRI
2018 89 of 130 7–6 4.84 MRI
2017 59 of 130 6–6 28.53 MRI
2016 6 of 128 13–1 86.91 MRI
2015 46 of 128 8–5 42.96 MRI
2014 54 of 128 8–5 33.48 MRI
2013 115 of 126 1–11 -47.86 MRI
2012 86 of 124 4–8 -0.37 MRI
2011 63 of 120 7–6 24.11 MRI
2010 65 of 120 6–6 20.85 MRI
2009 106 of 120 5–7 -23.73 MRI
2008 59 of 120 9–4 25.53 MRI
2007 78 of 120 5–7 11.70 MRI
2006 46 of 119 8–5 39.23 MRI
2005 79 of 119 7–4 15.42 MRI
2004 114 of 117 1–10 -42.66 MRI
2003 83 of 117 5–7 1.88 MRI