The MRI
2026 · Week 11

Miami (OH)

MAC · 6–4 · 4–2 in conference · MRI Classic #78

Power-9.5#102 of 138
Résumé-1.62#195 · wins above average
Playoff chance<0.1%out of the picture
Trendrating by week

Who to root for this week

Nothing this weekend moves the needle.

Nothing this weekend moves the needle.

Best winUConn (24–21)
Worst lossBowling Green (20–24)
Schedule faced-12.7 avg opponent
Schedule ahead-10.7 avg opponent
Roster talent#83 of 127 · worth -3.3, rated -9.5: short of it
Returning production14% of last year's · #108 of 128 · counted against its preseason rating
Home field+2.4 pts · 113th of 131

How this rating is built

Power = w × (average margin counted + average opponent rating) + (1 − w) × preseason prior, where w = games ÷ (games + 4). After 10 games, w is 71%, so the preseason prior is 29% of this rating. Every game played shrinks that share.

PartValueWeightAdds
Margin counted+2.9 avg× 71%+2.1
Opponents faced-12.7 avg× 71%-9.1
Preseason prior-8.6× 29%-2.5
Power-9.5

This explains how the model reached the number. The opponent ratings come out of the same fitted model, so it is not independent proof that the rating is right.

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the result against expectation. Adds is a different question: how many points of Power the game contributes, counting its margin and the strength of the opponent together. A game can beat expectation and still add little, or the reverse. Adds, plus the preseason prior, sum to Power (figures are rounded so the column adds up). Hover an Adds figure for its arithmetic.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerfAdds
1 at Pittsburgh L 14–59 -19.0 -26.0 -2.5
2 vs Holy Cross FCS W 45–7 +27.2 +10.8 +0.1
3 at Cincinnati L 31–35 -12.9 +8.9 -0.2
4 vs UConn W 24–21 -0.5 +3.5 -0.3
5 vs Bowling Green L 20–24 +12.6 -16.6 -2.0
6 at UMass W 20–19 +6.2 -5.2 -1.0
7 vs Akron W 34–14 +16.3 +3.7 +0.0
8 at Central Michigan W 28–27 -1.2 +2.2 -0.5
10 vs Buffalo L 31–34 +8.2 -11.2 -1.5
11 vs Ohio W 34–17 +0.3 +16.7 +0.9
Preseason prior (29% of the rating)-2.5
Power-9.5

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
12 at Kent State +8.3 69%
13 at Western Michigan -12.0 23%

Coaches

Mean added leaves out 1978–1980, the first seasons rated, which have no preseason prior to measure against.

CoachYearsRecordMean added
Tom Reed1978–198234-19-2-3.2
Tim Rose1983–198931-44-3-5.2
Randy Walker1990–199858-36-5+0.8
Terry Hoeppner1999–200448-25-0.0
Shane Montgomery2005–200817-31-7.6
Michael Haywood2009–201010-15-1.4
Don Treadwell2011–20138-21-10.4
Chuck Martin2014–202678-78-0.5

Season by season

Best finish: #4 in 2003. 48 seasons rated. The two columns' numbers are not comparable; the rank within each is. Season links open that year's game log.

25 1 150 2003 (MRI Classic): #4 of 117 (13-1)2004 (MRI Classic): #50 of 117 (8-5)2005 (MRI Classic): #31 of 119 (7-4)2006 (MRI Classic): #99 of 119 (2-10)2007 (MRI Classic): #87 of 120 (6-7)2008 (MRI Classic): #115 of 120 (2-10)2009 (MRI Classic): #112 of 120 (1-11)2010 (MRI Classic): #62 of 120 (10-4)2011 (MRI Classic): #85 of 120 (4-8)2012 (MRI Classic): #99 of 124 (4-8)2013 (MRI Classic): #126 of 126 (0-12)2014 (MRI Classic): #109 of 128 (2-10)2015 (MRI Classic): #111 of 128 (3-9)2016 (MRI Classic): #79 of 128 (6-7)2017 (MRI Classic): #76 of 130 (5-7)2018 (MRI Classic): #53 of 130 (6-6)2019 (MRI Classic): #80 of 130 (8-6)1978 (MRI 2.0): #43 of 138 (8-3)1979 (MRI 2.0): #39 of 138 (6-5)1980 (MRI 2.0): #53 of 138 (5-6)1981 (MRI 2.0): #61 of 136 (8-3)1982 (MRI 2.0): #69 of 105 (7-4)1983 (MRI 2.0): #81 of 105 (4-7)1984 (MRI 2.0): #84 of 106 (4-7)1985 (MRI 2.0): #65 of 106 (8-3)1986 (MRI 2.0): #53 of 105 (8-4)1987 (MRI 2.0): #74 of 104 (5-6)1988 (MRI 2.0): #102 of 104 (0-11)1989 (MRI 2.0): #104 of 106 (2-9)1990 (MRI 2.0): #94 of 107 (5-6)1991 (MRI 2.0): #75 of 107 (6-5)1992 (MRI 2.0): #82 of 107 (6-5)1993 (MRI 2.0): #93 of 106 (4-7)1994 (MRI 2.0): #80 of 107 (5-6)1995 (MRI 2.0): #52 of 108 (8-3)1996 (MRI 2.0): #55 of 111 (6-5)1997 (MRI 2.0): #32 of 112 (8-3)1998 (MRI 2.0): #40 of 112 (10-1)1999 (MRI 2.0): #65 of 114 (7-4)2000 (MRI 2.0): #87 of 116 (6-5)2001 (MRI 2.0): #75 of 117 (7-5)2002 (MRI 2.0): #64 of 117 (7-5)2003 (MRI 2.0): #11 of 117 (13-1)2004 (MRI 2.0): #42 of 117 (8-5)2005 (MRI 2.0): #53 of 119 (7-4)2006 (MRI 2.0): #97 of 119 (2-10)2007 (MRI 2.0): #95 of 119 (6-7)2008 (MRI 2.0): #117 of 120 (2-10)2009 (MRI 2.0): #116 of 120 (1-11)2010 (MRI 2.0): #93 of 120 (10-4)2011 (MRI 2.0): #87 of 120 (4-8)2012 (MRI 2.0): #107 of 124 (4-8)2013 (MRI 2.0): #123 of 125 (0-12)2014 (MRI 2.0): #123 of 128 (2-10)2015 (MRI 2.0): #121 of 128 (3-9)2016 (MRI 2.0): #100 of 128 (6-7)2017 (MRI 2.0): #99 of 130 (5-7)2018 (MRI 2.0): #86 of 130 (6-6)2019 (MRI 2.0): #88 of 130 (8-6)2020 (MRI 2.0): #93 of 128 (2-1)2021 (MRI 2.0): #82 of 130 (7-6)2022 (MRI 2.0): #104 of 131 (6-7)2023 (MRI 2.0): #68 of 133 (11-3)2024 (MRI 2.0): #69 of 134 (9-5)2025 (MRI 2.0): #90 of 136 (7-7) MRI 2.0Classic 1978 2025

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 150 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Two lines where both ratings cover a season - MRI 2.0 in red, Classic in grey. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRec MRI 2.0MRI Classic
2025 7–7 #90 of 136 · -6.42 –
2024 9–5 #69 of 134 · -1.23 –
2023 11–3 #68 of 133 · -1.28 –
2022 6–7 #104 of 131 · -10.15 –
2021 7–6 #82 of 130 · -2.28 –
2020 2–1 #93 of 128 · -5.88 –
2019 8–6 #88 of 130 · -5.80 #80 of 130 · 9.01
2018 6–6 #86 of 130 · -3.94 #53 of 130 · 29.87
2017 5–7 #99 of 130 · -9.89 #76 of 130 · 16.10
2016 6–7 #100 of 128 · -12.01 #79 of 128 · 8.59
2015 3–9 #121 of 128 · -21.38 #111 of 128 · -29.47
2014 2–10 #123 of 128 · -21.74 #109 of 128 · -21.06
2013 0–12 #123 of 125 · -30.99 #126 of 126 · -100.93
2012 4–8 #107 of 124 · -15.61 #99 of 124 · -15.03
2011 4–8 #87 of 120 · -8.32 #85 of 120 · 3.70
2010 10–4 #93 of 120 · -10.86 #62 of 120 · 21.79
2009 1–11 #116 of 120 · -21.79 #112 of 120 · -45.33
2008 2–10 #117 of 120 · -20.85 #115 of 120 · -51.18
2007 6–7 #95 of 119 · -12.89 #87 of 120 · 3.34
2006 2–10 #97 of 119 · -10.66 #99 of 119 · -9.58
2005 7–4 #53 of 119 · 2.94 #31 of 119 · 49.97
2004 8–5 #42 of 117 · 4.11 #50 of 117 · 33.59
2003 13–1 #11 of 117 · 16.44 #4 of 117 · 115.78
2002 7–5 #64 of 117 · 0.60 –
2001 7–5 #75 of 117 · -3.48 –
2000 6–5 #87 of 116 · -8.28 –
1999 7–4 #65 of 114 · -1.45 –
1998 10–1 #40 of 112 · 5.68 –
1997 8–3 #32 of 112 · 6.85 –
1996 6–5 #55 of 111 · 0.21 –
1995 8–3 #52 of 108 · 1.78 –
1994 5–6 #80 of 107 · -11.28 –
1993 4–7 #93 of 106 · -15.88 –
1992 6–5 #82 of 107 · -7.61 –
1991 6–5 #75 of 107 · -6.97 –
1990 5–6 #94 of 107 · -16.41 –
1989 2–9 #104 of 106 · -24.70 –
1988 0–11 #102 of 104 · -23.91 –
1987 5–6 #74 of 104 · -7.38 –
1986 8–4 #53 of 105 · -0.28 –
1985 8–3 #65 of 106 · -3.65 –
1984 4–7 #84 of 106 · -8.88 –
1983 4–7 #81 of 105 · -8.50 –
1982 7–4 #69 of 105 · -4.65 –
1981 8–3 #61 of 136 · 0.75 –
1980 5–6 #53 of 138 · 2.05 –
1979 6–5 #39 of 138 · 6.52 –
1978 8–3 #43 of 138 · 5.58 –