The MRI
2026 · Week 11

Ohio

MAC · 7–3 · 5–1 in conference · MRI Classic #75

Power-6.8#93 of 138
Résumé-0.81#162 · wins above average
Playoff chance<0.1%out of the picture
Trendrating by week

Who to root for this week

Nothing this weekend moves the needle.

Nothing this weekend moves the needle.

Best winJacksonville State (29–27)
Worst lossMiami (OH) (17–34)
Schedule faced-13.9 avg opponent
Schedule ahead-12.5 avg opponent
Roster talent#122 of 127 · worth -8.5, rated -6.8: in line with it
Returning production62% of last year's · #38 of 128
Home field+2.6 pts · 93rd of 131

How this rating is built

Power = w × (average margin counted + average opponent rating) + (1 − w) × preseason prior, where w = games ÷ (games + 4). After 10 games, w is 71%, so the preseason prior is 29% of this rating. Every game played shrinks that share.

PartValueWeightAdds
Margin counted+6.4 avg× 71%+4.5
Opponents faced-13.9 avg× 71%-9.9
Preseason prior-4.8× 29%-1.4
Power-6.8

This explains how the model reached the number. The opponent ratings come out of the same fitted model, so it is not independent proof that the rating is right.

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the result against expectation. Adds is a different question: how many points of Power the game contributes, counting its margin and the strength of the opponent together. A game can beat expectation and still add little, or the reverse. Adds, plus the preseason prior, sum to Power (figures are rounded so the column adds up). Hover an Adds figure for its arithmetic.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerfAdds
1 at Nebraska L 21–49 -22.3 -5.7 -1.2
2 vs Jacksonville State W 29–27 +2.1 -0.1 -0.4
3 at South Alabama L 36–41 -1.0 -4.0 -0.9
4 vs Stonehill FCS W 35–7 +29.9 -1.9 -0.2
5 at Kent State W 13–10 +11.0 -8.0 -1.0
6 vs Central Michigan W 31–14 +7.6 +9.4 +0.5
7 at Sacramento State W 48–7 +13.6 +27.4 +1.5
8 vs Eastern Michigan W 24–20 +13.1 -9.1 -1.0
10 at Akron W 28–20 +13.0 -5.0 -0.7
11 at Miami (OH) L 17–34 -0.3 -16.7 -2.0
Preseason prior (29% of the rating)-1.4
Power-6.8

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
12 vs Ball State +19.1 88%
13 vs Toledo -1.6 46%

Coaches

Mean added leaves out 1978–1980, the first seasons rated, which have no preseason prior to measure against.

CoachYearsRecordMean added
Bob Kappes19783-8–
Brian Burke1979–198431-34-1-6.7
Cleve Bryant1985–19899-44-2-8.1
Tom Lichtenberg1990–19948-45-2-8.0
Jim Grobe1995–200033-33-1+0.1
Brian Knorr2001–200411-35-6.4
Frank Solich2005–2020115-82-1.4
Tim Albin2021–202434-19+1.0
John Hauser20267-3-3.6

Season by season

Best finish: #20 in 2018. 48 seasons rated. The two columns' numbers are not comparable; the rank within each is. Season links open that year's game log.

25 1 150 2003 (MRI Classic): #100 of 117 (2-10)2004 (MRI Classic): #86 of 117 (4-7)2005 (MRI Classic): #102 of 119 (4-7)2006 (MRI Classic): #64 of 119 (9-5)2007 (MRI Classic): #79 of 120 (6-6)2008 (MRI Classic): #86 of 120 (4-8)2009 (MRI Classic): #53 of 120 (9-5)2010 (MRI Classic): #67 of 120 (8-5)2011 (MRI Classic): #30 of 120 (10-4)2012 (MRI Classic): #41 of 124 (9-4)2013 (MRI Classic): #84 of 126 (7-6)2014 (MRI Classic): #89 of 128 (6-6)2015 (MRI Classic): #68 of 128 (8-5)2016 (MRI Classic): #56 of 128 (8-6)2017 (MRI Classic): #37 of 130 (9-4)2018 (MRI Classic): #20 of 130 (9-4)2019 (MRI Classic): #53 of 130 (7-6)1978 (MRI 2.0): #122 of 138 (3-8)1979 (MRI 2.0): #80 of 138 (6-5)1980 (MRI 2.0): #87 of 138 (6-5)1981 (MRI 2.0): #101 of 136 (5-6)1982 (MRI 2.0): #97 of 105 (6-5)1983 (MRI 2.0): #95 of 105 (4-7)1984 (MRI 2.0): #100 of 106 (4-7)1985 (MRI 2.0): #103 of 106 (2-9)1986 (MRI 2.0): #104 of 105 (1-10)1987 (MRI 2.0): #103 of 104 (1-10)1988 (MRI 2.0): #97 of 104 (4-7)1989 (MRI 2.0): #103 of 106 (1-10)1990 (MRI 2.0): #106 of 107 (1-10)1991 (MRI 2.0): #104 of 107 (2-9)1992 (MRI 2.0): #103 of 107 (1-10)1993 (MRI 2.0): #103 of 106 (4-7)1994 (MRI 2.0): #106 of 107 (0-11)1995 (MRI 2.0): #104 of 108 (2-9)1996 (MRI 2.0): #79 of 111 (6-6)1997 (MRI 2.0): #61 of 112 (8-3)1998 (MRI 2.0): #79 of 112 (5-6)1999 (MRI 2.0): #93 of 114 (5-6)2000 (MRI 2.0): #70 of 116 (7-4)2001 (MRI 2.0): #95 of 117 (1-10)2002 (MRI 2.0): #97 of 117 (4-8)2003 (MRI 2.0): #105 of 117 (2-10)2004 (MRI 2.0): #97 of 117 (4-7)2005 (MRI 2.0): #103 of 119 (4-7)2006 (MRI 2.0): #82 of 119 (9-5)2007 (MRI 2.0): #88 of 119 (6-6)2008 (MRI 2.0): #96 of 120 (4-8)2009 (MRI 2.0): #81 of 120 (9-5)2010 (MRI 2.0): #83 of 120 (8-5)2011 (MRI 2.0): #73 of 120 (10-4)2012 (MRI 2.0): #74 of 124 (9-4)2013 (MRI 2.0): #91 of 125 (7-6)2014 (MRI 2.0): #111 of 128 (6-6)2015 (MRI 2.0): #90 of 128 (8-5)2016 (MRI 2.0): #83 of 128 (8-6)2017 (MRI 2.0): #62 of 130 (9-4)2018 (MRI 2.0): #48 of 130 (9-4)2019 (MRI 2.0): #67 of 130 (7-6)2020 (MRI 2.0): #91 of 128 (2-1)2021 (MRI 2.0): #114 of 130 (3-9)2022 (MRI 2.0): #93 of 131 (10-4)2023 (MRI 2.0): #81 of 133 (10-3)2024 (MRI 2.0): #67 of 134 (11-3)2025 (MRI 2.0): #78 of 136 (9-4) MRI 2.0Classic 1978 2025

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 150 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Two lines where both ratings cover a season - MRI 2.0 in red, Classic in grey. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRec MRI 2.0MRI Classic
2025 9–4 #78 of 136 · -2.67 –
2024 11–3 #67 of 134 · -0.64 –
2023 10–3 #81 of 133 · -3.59 –
2022 10–4 #93 of 131 · -6.07 –
2021 3–9 #114 of 130 · -15.24 –
2020 2–1 #91 of 128 · -5.43 –
2019 7–6 #67 of 130 · -0.50 #53 of 130 · 24.13
2018 9–4 #48 of 130 · 5.62 #20 of 130 · 64.58
2017 9–4 #62 of 130 · 2.03 #37 of 130 · 47.24
2016 8–6 #83 of 128 · -5.32 #56 of 128 · 28.17
2015 8–5 #90 of 128 · -6.75 #68 of 128 · 21.41
2014 6–6 #111 of 128 · -13.62 #89 of 128 · -1.74
2013 7–6 #91 of 125 · -8.77 #84 of 126 · 1.99
2012 9–4 #74 of 124 · -4.29 #41 of 124 · 44.26
2011 10–4 #73 of 120 · -2.46 #30 of 120 · 52.31
2010 8–5 #83 of 120 · -7.01 #67 of 120 · 19.65
2009 9–5 #81 of 120 · -5.34 #53 of 120 · 28.57
2008 4–8 #96 of 120 · -10.82 #86 of 120 · -0.21
2007 6–6 #88 of 119 · -10.23 #79 of 120 · 11.54
2006 9–5 #82 of 119 · -7.00 #64 of 119 · 19.56
2005 4–7 #103 of 119 · -15.97 #102 of 119 · -17.49
2004 4–7 #97 of 117 · -13.12 #86 of 117 · -1.46
2003 2–10 #105 of 117 · -16.26 #100 of 117 · -23.38
2002 4–8 #97 of 117 · -12.92 –
2001 1–10 #95 of 117 · -12.94 –
2000 7–4 #70 of 116 · -2.58 –
1999 5–6 #93 of 114 · -10.27 –
1998 5–6 #79 of 112 · -7.40 –
1997 8–3 #61 of 112 · -1.77 –
1996 6–6 #79 of 111 · -8.21 –
1995 2–9 #104 of 108 · -26.40 –
1994 0–11 #106 of 107 · -28.39 –
1993 4–7 #103 of 106 · -22.31 –
1992 1–10 #103 of 107 · -21.21 –
1991 2–9 #104 of 107 · -23.36 –
1990 1–10 #106 of 107 · -28.55 –
1989 1–10 #103 of 106 · -24.44 –
1988 4–7 #97 of 104 · -21.95 –
1987 1–10 #103 of 104 · -23.74 –
1986 1–10 #104 of 105 · -25.74 –
1985 2–9 #103 of 106 · -21.68 –
1984 4–7 #100 of 106 · -16.94 –
1983 4–7 #95 of 105 · -17.52 –
1982 6–5 #97 of 105 · -16.47 –
1981 5–6 #101 of 136 · -7.49 –
1980 6–5 #87 of 138 · -3.50 –
1979 6–5 #80 of 138 · -2.31 –
1978 3–8 #122 of 138 · -12.84 –