The MRI
2026 · Week 11

UNLV

Mountain West · 5–4 · 3–2 in conference · MRI Classic #72

Power-6.1#91 of 138
Résumé-1.35#190 · wins above average
Playoff chance<0.1%out of the picture
Trendrating by week

Who to root for this week

Nothing this weekend moves the needle.

Nothing this weekend moves the needle.

Best winNorth Dakota State (13–7)
Worst lossWyoming (35–41)
Schedule faced-8.9 avg opponent
Schedule ahead-6.7 avg opponent
Roster talent#54 of 127 · worth +0.6, rated -6.1: short of it
Returning production15% of last year's · #102 of 128 · counted against its preseason rating
Home field+3.0 pts · 53rd of 131
The Hidden Heisman Hidden HeismanJackson Arnold · Week 5

How this rating is built

Power = w × (average margin counted + average opponent rating) + (1 − w) × preseason prior, where w = games ÷ (games + 4). After 9 games, w is 69%, so the preseason prior is 31% of this rating. Every game played shrinks that share.

PartValueWeightAdds
Margin counted+0.9 avg× 69%+0.6
Opponents faced-8.9 avg× 69%-6.2
Preseason prior-1.8× 31%-0.5
Power-6.1

This explains how the model reached the number. The opponent ratings come out of the same fitted model, so it is not independent proof that the rating is right.

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the result against expectation. Adds is a different question: how many points of Power the game contributes, counting its margin and the strength of the opponent together. A game can beat expectation and still add little, or the reverse. Adds, plus the preseason prior, sum to Power (figures are rounded so the column adds up). Hover an Adds figure for its arithmetic.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerfAdds
1 vs Memphis L 21–27 -7.1 +1.1 -0.5
1 at Hawaii W 21–6 +2.5 +12.5 +0.8
2 at North Texas L 6–44 -12.2 -25.8 -2.6
4 at Akron W 38–10 +13.6 +14.4 +1.0
5 vs California W 39–31 +4.5 +3.5 +0.0
6 vs North Dakota State W 13–7 -0.0 +6.0 +0.1
7 at Air Force L 31–41 -5.2 -4.8 -1.1
9 vs Northern Illinois W 31–24 +21.9 -14.9 -1.4
10 vs Wyoming L 35–41 +10.2 -16.2 -1.9
Preseason prior (31% of the rating)-0.5
Power-6.1

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
11 at New Mexico -14.8 18%
12 at San Jose State +3.5 58%
13 vs Nevada +10.1 73%

The Hidden Heisman Hidden Heisman

The week’s biggest game from outside the power conferences, from a player the Heisman odds were not talking about. How it is picked.

SeasonWkPlayerOpponentLine
20265Jackson Arnoldvs California177 pass, 3 TD · 110 rush, 2 TD

Coaches

Mean added leaves out 1978–1980, the first seasons rated, which have no preseason prior to measure against.

CoachYearsRecordMean added
Tony Knap1978–198129-15-2-10.4
Harvey Hyde1982–198526-19-1-2.6
Wayne Nunnely1986–198919-25-6.2
Jim Strong1990–199317-27-6.0
Jeff Horton1994–199813-44-6.1
John Robinson1999–200428-42-1.3
Mike Sanford Sr.2005–200916-43-4.1
Bobby Hauck2010–201415-49-6.9
Tony Sanchez2015–201920-40-4.1
Marcus Arroyo2020–20227-23-5.8
Barry Odom2023–202420-8+8.7
Dan Mullen2025–202615-8-2.6

Season by season

Best finish: #40 in 1980. 48 seasons rated. The two columns' numbers are not comparable; the rank within each is. Season links open that year's game log.

25 1 150 2003 (MRI Classic): #68 of 117 (6-6)2004 (MRI Classic): #102 of 117 (2-9)2005 (MRI Classic): #109 of 119 (2-9)2006 (MRI Classic): #110 of 119 (2-10)2007 (MRI Classic): #91 of 120 (2-10)2008 (MRI Classic): #92 of 120 (5-7)2009 (MRI Classic): #98 of 120 (5-7)2010 (MRI Classic): #115 of 120 (2-11)2011 (MRI Classic): #116 of 120 (2-10)2012 (MRI Classic): #116 of 124 (2-11)2013 (MRI Classic): #80 of 126 (7-6)2014 (MRI Classic): #125 of 128 (2-11)2015 (MRI Classic): #102 of 128 (3-9)2016 (MRI Classic): #106 of 128 (4-8)2017 (MRI Classic): #96 of 130 (5-7)2018 (MRI Classic): #108 of 130 (4-8)2019 (MRI Classic): #118 of 130 (4-8)1978 (MRI 2.0): #55 of 138 (7-4)1979 (MRI 2.0): #54 of 138 (9-3)1980 (MRI 2.0): #40 of 138 (7-4)1981 (MRI 2.0): #97 of 136 (6-6)1982 (MRI 2.0): #90 of 105 (3-8)1983 (MRI 2.0): #67 of 105 (7-4)1984 (MRI 2.0): #51 of 106 (11-2)1985 (MRI 2.0): #79 of 106 (5-6)1986 (MRI 2.0): #70 of 105 (6-5)1987 (MRI 2.0): #88 of 104 (5-6)1988 (MRI 2.0): #95 of 104 (4-7)1989 (MRI 2.0): #96 of 106 (4-7)1990 (MRI 2.0): #101 of 107 (4-7)1991 (MRI 2.0): #102 of 107 (4-7)1992 (MRI 2.0): #100 of 107 (6-5)1993 (MRI 2.0): #100 of 106 (3-8)1994 (MRI 2.0): #90 of 107 (7-5)1995 (MRI 2.0): #108 of 108 (2-9)1996 (MRI 2.0): #107 of 111 (1-11)1997 (MRI 2.0): #94 of 112 (3-8)1998 (MRI 2.0): #104 of 112 (0-11)1999 (MRI 2.0): #104 of 114 (3-8)2000 (MRI 2.0): #64 of 116 (8-5)2001 (MRI 2.0): #67 of 117 (4-7)2002 (MRI 2.0): #79 of 117 (5-7)2003 (MRI 2.0): #69 of 117 (6-6)2004 (MRI 2.0): #91 of 117 (2-9)2005 (MRI 2.0): #106 of 119 (2-9)2006 (MRI 2.0): #107 of 119 (2-10)2007 (MRI 2.0): #94 of 119 (2-10)2008 (MRI 2.0): #97 of 120 (5-7)2009 (MRI 2.0): #92 of 120 (5-7)2010 (MRI 2.0): #108 of 120 (2-11)2011 (MRI 2.0): #115 of 120 (2-10)2012 (MRI 2.0): #116 of 124 (2-11)2013 (MRI 2.0): #97 of 125 (7-6)2014 (MRI 2.0): #120 of 128 (2-11)2015 (MRI 2.0): #102 of 128 (3-9)2016 (MRI 2.0): #112 of 128 (4-8)2017 (MRI 2.0): #101 of 130 (5-7)2018 (MRI 2.0): #108 of 130 (4-8)2019 (MRI 2.0): #117 of 130 (4-8)2020 (MRI 2.0): #120 of 128 (0-6)2021 (MRI 2.0): #111 of 130 (2-10)2022 (MRI 2.0): #106 of 131 (5-7)2023 (MRI 2.0): #73 of 133 (9-5)2024 (MRI 2.0): #42 of 134 (11-3)2025 (MRI 2.0): #68 of 136 (10-4) MRI 2.0Classic 1978 2025

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 150 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Two lines where both ratings cover a season - MRI 2.0 in red, Classic in grey. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRec MRI 2.0MRI Classic
2025 10–4 #68 of 136 · -0.40 –
2024 11–3 #42 of 134 · 7.13 –
2023 9–5 #73 of 133 · -2.22 –
2022 5–7 #106 of 131 · -10.90 –
2021 2–10 #111 of 130 · -14.76 –
2020 0–6 #120 of 128 · -19.07 –
2019 4–8 #117 of 130 · -16.60 #118 of 130 · -37.74
2018 4–8 #108 of 130 · -15.16 #108 of 130 · -28.11
2017 5–7 #101 of 130 · -11.40 #96 of 130 · 0.99
2016 4–8 #112 of 128 · -14.57 #106 of 128 · -21.36
2015 3–9 #102 of 128 · -14.42 #102 of 128 · -16.52
2014 2–11 #120 of 128 · -19.55 #125 of 128 · -54.66
2013 7–6 #97 of 125 · -10.46 #80 of 126 · 11.20
2012 2–11 #116 of 124 · -19.33 #116 of 124 · -40.84
2011 2–10 #115 of 120 · -23.00 #116 of 120 · -66.02
2010 2–11 #108 of 120 · -18.22 #115 of 120 · -51.79
2009 5–7 #92 of 120 · -10.13 #98 of 120 · -6.10
2008 5–7 #97 of 120 · -10.82 #92 of 120 · -7.00
2007 2–10 #94 of 119 · -12.32 #91 of 120 · -6.04
2006 2–10 #107 of 119 · -15.24 #110 of 119 · -34.71
2005 2–9 #106 of 119 · -17.59 #109 of 119 · -28.99
2004 2–9 #91 of 117 · -10.32 #102 of 117 · -20.34
2003 6–6 #69 of 117 · -3.29 #68 of 117 · 22.95
2002 5–7 #79 of 117 · -6.76 –
2001 4–7 #67 of 117 · -0.18 –
2000 8–5 #64 of 116 · -0.16 –
1999 3–8 #104 of 114 · -17.99 –
1998 0–11 #104 of 112 · -17.91 –
1997 3–8 #94 of 112 · -14.47 –
1996 1–11 #107 of 111 · -24.25 –
1995 2–9 #108 of 108 · -34.13 –
1994 7–5 #90 of 107 · -13.53 –
1993 3–8 #100 of 106 · -19.49 –
1992 6–5 #100 of 107 · -18.59 –
1991 4–7 #102 of 107 · -22.93 –
1990 4–7 #101 of 107 · -19.06 –
1989 4–7 #96 of 106 · -20.02 –
1988 4–7 #95 of 104 · -20.08 –
1987 5–6 #88 of 104 · -13.27 –
1986 6–5 #70 of 105 · -7.33 –
1985 5–6 #79 of 106 · -9.84 –
1984 11–2 #51 of 106 · 1.39 –
1983 7–4 #67 of 105 · -4.39 –
1982 3–8 #90 of 105 · -12.84 –
1981 6–6 #97 of 136 · -6.52 –
1980 7–4 #40 of 138 · 5.91 –
1979 9–3 #54 of 138 · 2.94 –
1978 7–4 #55 of 138 · 3.05 –