The MRI
2026 · Week 11

Eastern Michigan

MAC · 4–6 · 3–3 in conference · MRI Classic #119

Power-16.9#125 of 138
Résumé-3.27#220 · wins above average
Playoff chance<0.1%out of the picture
Trendrating by week

Who to root for this week

Nothing this weekend moves the needle.

Nothing this weekend moves the needle.

Best winUMass (38–14)
Worst lossSan Jose State (21–27)
Schedule faced-12.7 avg opponent
Schedule ahead-10.7 avg opponent
Roster talent#99 of 127 · worth -5.5, rated -16.9: short of it
Returning production72% of last year's · #19 of 128
Home field+1.6 pts · 131st of 131

How this rating is built

Power = w × (average margin counted + average opponent rating) + (1 − w) × preseason prior, where w = games ÷ (games + 4). After 10 games, w is 71%, so the preseason prior is 29% of this rating. Every game played shrinks that share.

PartValueWeightAdds
Margin counted-6.7 avg× 71%-4.8
Opponents faced-12.7 avg× 71%-9.1
Preseason prior-10.5× 29%-3.0
Power-16.9

This explains how the model reached the number. The opponent ratings come out of the same fitted model, so it is not independent proof that the rating is right.

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the result against expectation. Adds is a different question: how many points of Power the game contributes, counting its margin and the strength of the opponent together. A game can beat expectation and still add little, or the reverse. Adds, plus the preseason prior, sum to Power (figures are rounded so the column adds up). Hover an Adds figure for its arithmetic.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerfAdds
1 vs Sacramento State W 28–17 +9.6 +1.4 -0.8
1 vs San Jose State L 21–27 -1.2 -4.8 -1.7
2 at Michigan State L 7–35 -21.8 -6.2 -2.0
3 at Wisconsin L 10–54 -29.6 -14.4 -2.2
4 vs Lindenwood FCS W 29–3 +19.8 +6.2 -0.9
5 at UMass W 38–14 -1.2 +25.2 +0.9
6 at Akron W 25–23 +2.9 -0.9 -1.2
7 vs Toledo L 14–34 -11.7 -8.3 -2.1
8 at Ohio L 20–24 -13.1 +9.1 -0.7
10 N Central Michigan L 7–35 -5.5 -22.5 -3.2
Preseason prior (29% of the rating)-3.0
Power-16.9

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
12 at Western Michigan -19.3 12%
13 vs Kent State +7.0 66%

Coaches

Mean added leaves out 1978–1980, the first seasons rated, which have no preseason prior to measure against.

CoachYearsRecordMean added
Mike Stock1978–19826-38-1-7.3
Jim Harkema1983–199241-57-5-5.0
Ron Cooper1993–19949-13-2.3
Rick Rasnick1995–199920-35-4.6
Jeff Woodruff2000–200311-35-10.0
Jeff Genyk2004–200816-42-4.4
Ron English2009–201311-46-9.6
Chris Creighton2014–202665-89-3.0

Season by season

Best finish: #52 in 2018. 48 seasons rated. The two columns' numbers are not comparable; the rank within each is. Season links open that year's game log.

25 1 150 2003 (MRI Classic): #113 of 117 (3-9)2004 (MRI Classic): #101 of 117 (4-7)2005 (MRI Classic): #84 of 119 (4-7)2006 (MRI Classic): #113 of 119 (1-11)2007 (MRI Classic): #105 of 120 (4-8)2008 (MRI Classic): #107 of 120 (3-9)2009 (MRI Classic): #119 of 120 (0-12)2010 (MRI Classic): #118 of 120 (2-10)2011 (MRI Classic): #77 of 120 (6-6)2012 (MRI Classic): #117 of 124 (2-10)2013 (MRI Classic): #125 of 126 (2-10)2014 (MRI Classic): #128 of 128 (2-10)2015 (MRI Classic): #125 of 128 (1-11)2016 (MRI Classic): #83 of 128 (7-6)2017 (MRI Classic): #68 of 130 (5-7)2018 (MRI Classic): #52 of 130 (7-6)2019 (MRI Classic): #97 of 130 (6-7)1978 (MRI 2.0): #125 of 138 (3-7)1979 (MRI 2.0): #128 of 138 (2-9)1980 (MRI 2.0): #137 of 138 (1-9)1981 (MRI 2.0): #136 of 136 (0-11)1982 (MRI 2.0): #105 of 105 (1-10)1983 (MRI 2.0): #105 of 105 (1-10)1984 (MRI 2.0): #102 of 106 (2-9)1985 (MRI 2.0): #100 of 106 (4-7)1986 (MRI 2.0): #95 of 105 (6-5)1987 (MRI 2.0): #67 of 104 (10-2)1988 (MRI 2.0): #84 of 104 (6-4)1989 (MRI 2.0): #83 of 106 (7-4)1990 (MRI 2.0): #102 of 107 (2-9)1991 (MRI 2.0): #97 of 107 (3-8)1992 (MRI 2.0): #104 of 107 (1-10)1993 (MRI 2.0): #102 of 106 (4-7)1994 (MRI 2.0): #92 of 107 (5-6)1995 (MRI 2.0): #86 of 108 (6-5)1996 (MRI 2.0): #96 of 111 (3-8)1997 (MRI 2.0): #91 of 112 (4-7)1998 (MRI 2.0): #106 of 112 (3-8)1999 (MRI 2.0): #100 of 114 (4-7)2000 (MRI 2.0): #109 of 116 (3-8)2001 (MRI 2.0): #115 of 117 (2-9)2002 (MRI 2.0): #117 of 117 (3-9)2003 (MRI 2.0): #114 of 117 (3-9)2004 (MRI 2.0): #115 of 117 (4-7)2005 (MRI 2.0): #99 of 119 (4-7)2006 (MRI 2.0): #112 of 119 (1-11)2007 (MRI 2.0): #105 of 119 (4-8)2008 (MRI 2.0): #112 of 120 (3-9)2009 (MRI 2.0): #120 of 120 (0-12)2010 (MRI 2.0): #119 of 120 (2-10)2011 (MRI 2.0): #107 of 120 (6-6)2012 (MRI 2.0): #119 of 124 (2-10)2013 (MRI 2.0): #125 of 125 (2-10)2014 (MRI 2.0): #128 of 128 (2-10)2015 (MRI 2.0): #128 of 128 (1-11)2016 (MRI 2.0): #103 of 128 (7-6)2017 (MRI 2.0): #88 of 130 (5-7)2018 (MRI 2.0): #80 of 130 (7-6)2019 (MRI 2.0): #97 of 130 (6-7)2020 (MRI 2.0): #107 of 128 (2-4)2021 (MRI 2.0): #99 of 130 (7-6)2022 (MRI 2.0): #102 of 131 (9-4)2023 (MRI 2.0): #127 of 133 (6-7)2024 (MRI 2.0): #120 of 134 (5-7)2025 (MRI 2.0): #123 of 136 (4-8) MRI 2.0Classic 1978 2025

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 150 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Two lines where both ratings cover a season - MRI 2.0 in red, Classic in grey. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRec MRI 2.0MRI Classic
2025 4–8 #123 of 136 · -16.72 –
2024 5–7 #120 of 134 · -15.14 –
2023 6–7 #127 of 133 · -17.79 –
2022 9–4 #102 of 131 · -9.99 –
2021 7–6 #99 of 130 · -9.55 –
2020 2–4 #107 of 128 · -11.64 –
2019 6–7 #97 of 130 · -8.47 #97 of 130 · -4.02
2018 7–6 #80 of 130 · -3.02 #52 of 130 · 31.07
2017 5–7 #88 of 130 · -6.18 #68 of 130 · 21.02
2016 7–6 #103 of 128 · -12.33 #83 of 128 · 6.65
2015 1–11 #128 of 128 · -27.92 #125 of 128 · -65.94
2014 2–10 #128 of 128 · -30.63 #128 of 128 · -84.71
2013 2–10 #125 of 125 · -31.85 #125 of 126 · -84.77
2012 2–10 #119 of 124 · -21.49 #117 of 124 · -45.07
2011 6–6 #107 of 120 · -15.92 #77 of 120 · 8.41
2010 2–10 #119 of 120 · -28.86 #118 of 120 · -67.35
2009 0–12 #120 of 120 · -26.66 #119 of 120 · -77.09
2008 3–9 #112 of 120 · -18.03 #107 of 120 · -25.67
2007 4–8 #105 of 119 · -15.36 #105 of 120 · -20.89
2006 1–11 #112 of 119 · -18.43 #113 of 119 · -45.70
2005 4–7 #99 of 119 · -13.78 #84 of 119 · 9.07
2004 4–7 #115 of 117 · -22.77 #101 of 117 · -18.71
2003 3–9 #114 of 117 · -25.84 #113 of 117 · -50.84
2002 3–9 #117 of 117 · -30.50 –
2001 2–9 #115 of 117 · -27.09 –
2000 3–8 #109 of 116 · -20.60 –
1999 4–7 #100 of 114 · -15.49 –
1998 3–8 #106 of 112 · -19.05 –
1997 4–7 #91 of 112 · -13.40 –
1996 3–8 #96 of 111 · -14.82 –
1995 6–5 #86 of 108 · -11.24 –
1994 5–6 #92 of 107 · -15.26 –
1993 4–7 #102 of 106 · -20.95 –
1992 1–10 #104 of 107 · -23.63 –
1991 3–8 #97 of 107 · -16.87 –
1990 2–9 #102 of 107 · -19.44 –
1989 7–4 #83 of 106 · -10.97 –
1988 6–4 #84 of 104 · -12.03 –
1987 10–2 #67 of 104 · -5.54 –
1986 6–5 #95 of 105 · -16.48 –
1985 4–7 #100 of 106 · -18.24 –
1984 2–9 #102 of 106 · -19.87 –
1983 1–10 #105 of 105 · -26.85 –
1982 1–10 #105 of 105 · -24.81 –
1981 0–11 #136 of 136 · -30.09 –
1980 1–9 #137 of 138 · -28.12 –
1979 2–9 #128 of 138 · -17.38 –
1978 3–7 #125 of 138 · -14.04 –