The MRI
2026 · Week 11

Nevada

Mountain West · 3–6 · 2–3 in conference · MRI Classic #106

Power-13.2#114 of 138
Résumé-3.26#218 · wins above average
Playoff chance<0.1%out of the picture
Trendrating by week

Who to root for this week

Nothing this weekend moves the needle.

Nothing this weekend moves the needle.

Best winSan Jose State (28–13)
Worst lossMontana State (7–20)
Schedule faced-8.5 avg opponent
Schedule ahead-14.3 avg opponent
Roster talent#112 of 127 · worth -7.1, rated -13.2: short of it
Returning production36% of last year's · #73 of 128
Home field+4.5 pts · 7th of 131

How this rating is built

Power = w × (average margin counted + average opponent rating) + (1 − w) × preseason prior, where w = games ÷ (games + 4). After 9 games, w is 69%, so the preseason prior is 31% of this rating. Every game played shrinks that share.

PartValueWeightAdds
Margin counted-4.1 avg× 69%-2.8
Opponents faced-8.5 avg× 69%-5.9
Preseason prior-14.6× 31%-4.5
Power-13.2

This explains how the model reached the number. The opponent ratings come out of the same fitted model, so it is not independent proof that the rating is right.

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the result against expectation. Adds is a different question: how many points of Power the game contributes, counting its margin and the strength of the opponent together. A game can beat expectation and still add little, or the reverse. Adds, plus the preseason prior, sum to Power (figures are rounded so the column adds up). Hover an Adds figure for its arithmetic.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerfAdds
1 vs Western Kentucky W 49–14 +3.1 +31.9 +1.7
2 vs Montana State FCS L 7–20 +23.5 -36.5 -3.3
3 at Middle Tennessee L 20–27 +0.9 -7.9 -1.8
4 vs Air Force L 33–36 -6.2 +3.2 -0.9
6 at UTEP W 30–13 +9.5 +7.5 -0.1
7 at North Dakota State L 17–31 -13.1 -0.9 -1.4
8 vs San Jose State W 28–13 +2.5 +12.5 +0.3
9 at UCLA L 0–27 -33.6 +6.6 -0.9
10 vs New Mexico L 3–31 -15.8 -12.2 -2.3
Preseason prior (31% of the rating)-4.5
Power-13.2

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
11 at Northern Illinois +8.8 70%
12 vs Hawaii +1.5 54%
13 at UNLV -10.1 27%

Coaches

CoachYearsRecordMean added
Chris Ault19927-5-1.1
Jeff Horton19937-4-0.2
Chris Ault1994–199518-5+2.1
Jeff Tisdel1996–199923-22-3.6
Chris Tormey2000–200316-31-3.9
Chris Ault2004–201270-46+0.3
Brian Polian2013–201623-27-4.5
Jay Norvell2017–202133-26+0.5
Ken Wilson2022–20234-20-10.3
Jeff Choate2024–20269-25-1.1

Season by season

Best finish: #10 in 2010. 34 seasons rated. The two columns' numbers are not comparable; the rank within each is. Season links open that year's game log.

25 1 150 2003 (MRI Classic): #71 of 117 (6-6)2004 (MRI Classic): #96 of 117 (5-7)2005 (MRI Classic): #71 of 119 (9-3)2006 (MRI Classic): #40 of 119 (8-5)2007 (MRI Classic): #70 of 120 (6-7)2008 (MRI Classic): #42 of 120 (7-6)2009 (MRI Classic): #39 of 120 (8-5)2010 (MRI Classic): #10 of 120 (13-1)2011 (MRI Classic): #36 of 120 (7-6)2012 (MRI Classic): #63 of 124 (7-6)2013 (MRI Classic): #87 of 126 (4-8)2014 (MRI Classic): #73 of 128 (7-6)2015 (MRI Classic): #79 of 128 (7-6)2016 (MRI Classic): #98 of 128 (5-7)2017 (MRI Classic): #101 of 130 (3-9)2018 (MRI Classic): #79 of 130 (8-5)2019 (MRI Classic): #103 of 130 (7-6)1992 (MRI 2.0): #93 of 107 (7-5)1993 (MRI 2.0): #80 of 106 (7-4)1994 (MRI 2.0): #70 of 107 (9-2)1995 (MRI 2.0): #58 of 108 (9-3)1996 (MRI 2.0): #46 of 111 (9-3)1997 (MRI 2.0): #62 of 112 (5-6)1998 (MRI 2.0): #72 of 112 (6-5)1999 (MRI 2.0): #98 of 114 (3-8)2000 (MRI 2.0): #110 of 116 (2-10)2001 (MRI 2.0): #101 of 117 (3-8)2002 (MRI 2.0): #84 of 117 (5-7)2003 (MRI 2.0): #88 of 117 (6-6)2004 (MRI 2.0): #100 of 117 (5-7)2005 (MRI 2.0): #83 of 119 (9-3)2006 (MRI 2.0): #51 of 119 (8-5)2007 (MRI 2.0): #74 of 119 (6-7)2008 (MRI 2.0): #60 of 120 (7-6)2009 (MRI 2.0): #56 of 120 (8-5)2010 (MRI 2.0): #21 of 120 (13-1)2011 (MRI 2.0): #45 of 120 (7-6)2012 (MRI 2.0): #64 of 124 (7-6)2013 (MRI 2.0): #81 of 125 (4-8)2014 (MRI 2.0): #71 of 128 (7-6)2015 (MRI 2.0): #92 of 128 (7-6)2016 (MRI 2.0): #105 of 128 (5-7)2017 (MRI 2.0): #102 of 130 (3-9)2018 (MRI 2.0): #89 of 130 (8-5)2019 (MRI 2.0): #114 of 130 (7-6)2020 (MRI 2.0): #70 of 128 (7-2)2021 (MRI 2.0): #57 of 130 (8-5)2022 (MRI 2.0): #124 of 131 (2-10)2023 (MRI 2.0): #130 of 133 (2-10)2024 (MRI 2.0): #109 of 134 (3-10)2025 (MRI 2.0): #118 of 136 (3-9) MRI 2.0Classic 1992 2025

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 150 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Two lines where both ratings cover a season - MRI 2.0 in red, Classic in grey. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRec MRI 2.0MRI Classic
2025 3–9 #118 of 136 · -15.19 –
2024 3–10 #109 of 134 · -11.59 –
2023 2–10 #130 of 133 · -20.96 –
2022 2–10 #124 of 131 · -16.70 –
2021 8–5 #57 of 130 · 4.06 –
2020 7–2 #70 of 128 · -0.66 –
2019 7–6 #114 of 130 · -13.48 #103 of 130 · -9.76
2018 8–5 #89 of 130 · -5.12 #79 of 130 · 15.14
2017 3–9 #102 of 130 · -11.48 #101 of 130 · -8.97
2016 5–7 #105 of 128 · -13.08 #98 of 128 · -12.08
2015 7–6 #92 of 128 · -7.22 #79 of 128 · 10.50
2014 7–6 #71 of 128 · -2.36 #73 of 128 · 18.20
2013 4–8 #81 of 125 · -5.90 #87 of 126 · -2.18
2012 7–6 #64 of 124 · -0.69 #63 of 124 · 23.68
2011 7–6 #45 of 120 · 4.43 #36 of 120 · 43.76
2010 13–1 #21 of 120 · 11.86 #10 of 120 · 83.19
2009 8–5 #56 of 120 · 2.06 #39 of 120 · 40.48
2008 7–6 #60 of 120 · -0.03 #42 of 120 · 40.52
2007 6–7 #74 of 119 · -4.38 #70 of 120 · 18.33
2006 8–5 #51 of 119 · 2.32 #40 of 119 · 43.64
2005 9–3 #83 of 119 · -7.91 #71 of 119 · 21.88
2004 5–7 #100 of 117 · -13.74 #96 of 117 · -8.15
2003 6–6 #88 of 117 · -9.70 #71 of 117 · 21.11
2002 5–7 #84 of 117 · -8.62 –
2001 3–8 #101 of 117 · -15.20 –
2000 2–10 #110 of 116 · -22.37 –
1999 3–8 #98 of 114 · -13.74 –
1998 6–5 #72 of 112 · -4.67 –
1997 5–6 #62 of 112 · -2.11 –
1996 9–3 #46 of 111 · 2.56 –
1995 9–3 #58 of 108 · -0.84 –
1994 9–2 #70 of 107 · -3.88 –
1993 7–4 #80 of 106 · -8.94 –
1992 7–5 #93 of 107 · -12.58 –