The MRI
2026 · Week 11

UCLA

Big Ten · 9–0 · 6–0 in conference · MRI Classic #3

Power+17.4#14 of 138
Résumé+4.47#4 · wins above average
Playoff chance68%#8 most likely · -0.4 pts this week
Trendrating by week

Who to root for this week

5 games · top: Michigan over Oregon, +3.1 pts playoff odds

The games this week that move its playoff odds most, and the side to cheer. Other teams’ games only; its own game is in the schedule below. How these are worked out.

Best winOregon (17–15)
Schedule faced+0.9 avg opponent
Schedule ahead+11.9 avg opponent
Roster talent#24 of 127 · worth +4.8, rated +17.4: beating it
Returning production57% of last year's · #47 of 128
Home field+2.6 pts · 100th of 131

How this rating is built

Power = w × (average margin counted + average opponent rating) + (1 − w) × preseason prior, where w = games ÷ (games + 4). After 9 games, w is 69%, so the preseason prior is 31% of this rating. Every game played shrinks that share.

PartValueWeightAdds
Margin counted+22.2 avg× 69%+15.4
Opponents faced+0.9 avg× 69%+0.6
Preseason prior+4.6× 31%+1.4
Power+17.4

This explains how the model reached the number. The opponent ratings come out of the same fitted model, so it is not independent proof that the rating is right.

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the result against expectation. Adds is a different question: how many points of Power the game contributes, counting its margin and the strength of the opponent together. A game can beat expectation and still add little, or the reverse. Adds, plus the preseason prior, sum to Power (figures are rounded so the column adds up). Hover an Adds figure for its arithmetic.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerfAdds
1 at California W 45–24 +22.0 -1.0 +1.6
2 vs San Diego State W 28–10 +27.6 -9.6 +1.0
3 vs Purdue W 52–38 +20.1 -6.1 +1.2
4 at Maryland W 54–3 +15.9 +35.1 +3.7
6 at Oregon W 17–15 -7.7 +9.7 +2.1
7 vs Wisconsin W 17–7 +10.6 -0.6 +1.6
8 vs Michigan State W 28–10 +18.5 -0.5 +1.7
9 vs Nevada W 27–0 +33.6 -6.6 +1.2
10 at Minnesota W 34–20 +11.0 +3.0 +1.9
Preseason prior (31% of the rating)+1.4
Power+17.4

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
11 vs Illinois +12.5 78%
12 at Michigan +3.8 59%
13 vs USC +2.9 57%

Coaches

Mean added leaves out 1978–1980, the first seasons rated, which have no preseason prior to measure against.

CoachYearsRecordMean added
Terry Donahue1978–1995135-68-7+4.0
Bob Toledo1996–200249-32+3.9
Karl Dorrell2003–200735-27+1.8
Rick Neuheisel2008–201121-28-2.3
Jim Mora2012–201746-30+3.9
Chip Kelly2018–202335-34+1.4
Deshaun Foster2024–20255-10-6.3
Bob Chesney20269-0+9.0

Season by season

Best finish: #5 in 1988. 48 seasons rated. The two columns' numbers are not comparable; the rank within each is. Season links open that year's game log.

25 1 100 2003 (MRI Classic): #63 of 117 (6-7)2004 (MRI Classic): #52 of 117 (6-6)2005 (MRI Classic): #34 of 119 (10-2)2006 (MRI Classic): #42 of 119 (7-6)2007 (MRI Classic): #47 of 120 (6-7)2008 (MRI Classic): #94 of 120 (4-8)2009 (MRI Classic): #58 of 120 (7-6)2010 (MRI Classic): #96 of 120 (4-8)2011 (MRI Classic): #89 of 120 (6-8)2012 (MRI Classic): #38 of 124 (9-5)2013 (MRI Classic): #15 of 126 (10-3)2014 (MRI Classic): #16 of 128 (10-3)2015 (MRI Classic): #45 of 128 (8-5)2016 (MRI Classic): #74 of 128 (4-8)2017 (MRI Classic): #92 of 130 (6-7)2018 (MRI Classic): #96 of 130 (3-9)2019 (MRI Classic): #88 of 130 (4-8)1978 (MRI 2.0): #27 of 138 (8-4)1979 (MRI 2.0): #32 of 138 (5-6)1980 (MRI 2.0): #12 of 138 (9-2)1981 (MRI 2.0): #14 of 136 (7-5)1982 (MRI 2.0): #6 of 105 (10-2)1983 (MRI 2.0): #12 of 105 (7-5)1984 (MRI 2.0): #31 of 106 (9-3)1985 (MRI 2.0): #10 of 106 (9-3)1986 (MRI 2.0): #8 of 105 (8-4)1987 (MRI 2.0): #5 of 104 (10-2)1988 (MRI 2.0): #5 of 104 (10-2)1989 (MRI 2.0): #26 of 106 (3-8)1990 (MRI 2.0): #29 of 107 (5-6)1991 (MRI 2.0): #13 of 107 (9-3)1992 (MRI 2.0): #36 of 107 (6-5)1993 (MRI 2.0): #12 of 106 (8-4)1994 (MRI 2.0): #33 of 107 (5-6)1995 (MRI 2.0): #27 of 108 (7-5)1996 (MRI 2.0): #30 of 111 (5-6)1997 (MRI 2.0): #8 of 112 (10-2)1998 (MRI 2.0): #7 of 112 (10-2)1999 (MRI 2.0): #44 of 114 (4-7)2000 (MRI 2.0): #39 of 116 (6-6)2001 (MRI 2.0): #14 of 117 (7-4)2002 (MRI 2.0): #21 of 117 (8-5)2003 (MRI 2.0): #52 of 117 (6-7)2004 (MRI 2.0): #32 of 117 (6-6)2005 (MRI 2.0): #27 of 119 (10-2)2006 (MRI 2.0): #27 of 119 (7-6)2007 (MRI 2.0): #29 of 119 (6-7)2008 (MRI 2.0): #66 of 120 (4-8)2009 (MRI 2.0): #53 of 120 (7-6)2010 (MRI 2.0): #66 of 120 (4-8)2011 (MRI 2.0): #70 of 120 (6-8)2012 (MRI 2.0): #32 of 124 (9-5)2013 (MRI 2.0): #15 of 125 (10-3)2014 (MRI 2.0): #13 of 128 (10-3)2015 (MRI 2.0): #24 of 128 (8-5)2016 (MRI 2.0): #53 of 128 (4-8)2017 (MRI 2.0): #60 of 130 (6-7)2018 (MRI 2.0): #75 of 130 (3-9)2019 (MRI 2.0): #79 of 130 (4-8)2020 (MRI 2.0): #37 of 128 (3-4)2021 (MRI 2.0): #18 of 130 (8-4)2022 (MRI 2.0): #25 of 131 (9-4)2023 (MRI 2.0): #29 of 133 (8-5)2024 (MRI 2.0): #51 of 134 (5-7)2025 (MRI 2.0): #73 of 136 (3-9) MRI 2.0Classic 1978 2025

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 100 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Two lines where both ratings cover a season - MRI 2.0 in red, Classic in grey. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRec MRI 2.0MRI Classic
2025 3–9 #73 of 136 · -2.03 –
2024 5–7 #51 of 134 · 4.83 –
2023 8–5 #29 of 133 · 8.62 –
2022 9–4 #25 of 131 · 11.36 –
2021 8–4 #18 of 130 · 13.12 –
2020 3–4 #37 of 128 · 6.51 –
2019 4–8 #79 of 130 · -3.39 #88 of 130 · 1.23
2018 3–9 #75 of 130 · -1.95 #96 of 130 · -3.16
2017 6–7 #60 of 130 · 2.44 #92 of 130 · 1.74
2016 4–8 #53 of 128 · 5.09 #74 of 128 · 12.78
2015 8–5 #24 of 128 · 13.28 #45 of 128 · 44.86
2014 10–3 #13 of 128 · 17.56 #16 of 128 · 65.70
2013 10–3 #15 of 125 · 18.99 #15 of 126 · 76.26
2012 9–5 #32 of 124 · 8.72 #38 of 124 · 46.95
2011 6–8 #70 of 120 · -1.79 #89 of 120 · -1.57
2010 4–8 #66 of 120 · -1.55 #96 of 120 · -12.80
2009 7–6 #53 of 120 · 2.58 #58 of 120 · 27.16
2008 4–8 #66 of 120 · -2.01 #94 of 120 · -9.03
2007 6–7 #29 of 119 · 9.36 #47 of 120 · 37.38
2006 7–6 #27 of 119 · 9.69 #42 of 119 · 42.71
2005 10–2 #27 of 119 · 11.06 #34 of 119 · 45.92
2004 6–6 #32 of 117 · 7.80 #52 of 117 · 31.95
2003 6–7 #52 of 117 · 2.89 #63 of 117 · 27.62
2002 8–5 #21 of 117 · 12.13 –
2001 7–4 #14 of 117 · 13.35 –
2000 6–6 #39 of 116 · 6.33 –
1999 4–7 #44 of 114 · 3.65 –
1998 10–2 #7 of 112 · 20.82 –
1997 10–2 #8 of 112 · 22.62 –
1996 5–6 #30 of 111 · 10.18 –
1995 7–5 #27 of 108 · 10.02 –
1994 5–6 #33 of 107 · 6.94 –
1993 8–4 #12 of 106 · 17.66 –
1992 6–5 #36 of 107 · 4.89 –
1991 9–3 #13 of 107 · 15.56 –
1990 5–6 #29 of 107 · 7.70 –
1989 3–8 #26 of 106 · 10.10 –
1988 10–2 #5 of 104 · 23.86 –
1987 10–2 #5 of 104 · 25.15 –
1986 8–4 #8 of 105 · 20.85 –
1985 9–3 #10 of 106 · 17.67 –
1984 9–3 #31 of 106 · 6.78 –
1983 7–5 #12 of 105 · 15.48 –
1982 10–2 #6 of 105 · 18.55 –
1981 7–5 #14 of 136 · 17.61 –
1980 9–2 #12 of 138 · 17.78 –
1979 5–6 #32 of 138 · 8.27 –
1978 8–4 #27 of 138 · 8.81 –