The MRI
2026 · Week 2

UCLA

Big Ten · 2–0 · MRI Classic #15

Power+5.7#47 of 138
Résumé+0.76#8 · wins above average
Movement+10up from #57 last week
Best winSan Diego State (28–10)
Schedule faced-4.0 avg opponent
Schedule ahead+4.4 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 at California W 45–24 +7.9 +13.1
2 vs San Diego State W 28–10 +11.4 +6.6

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
3 vs Purdue +17.8 86%
4 at Maryland -6.0 36%
6 at Oregon -18.7 13%
7 vs Wisconsin +10.0 73%
8 vs Michigan State +8.1 69%
9 vs Nevada +25.1 94%
10 at Minnesota +3.2 58%
11 vs Illinois +1.9 55%

Season by season

Best finish: #15 in 2013. 23 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 100 2003: #63 of 117 (6-7)2004: #52 of 117 (6-6)2005: #34 of 119 (10-2)2006: #42 of 119 (7-6)2007: #47 of 120 (6-7)2008: #94 of 120 (4-8)2009: #58 of 120 (7-6)2010: #96 of 120 (4-8)2011: #89 of 120 (6-8)2012: #38 of 124 (9-5)2013: #15 of 126 (10-3)2014: #16 of 128 (10-3)2015: #45 of 128 (8-5)2016: #74 of 128 (4-8)2017: #85 of 130 (6-6)2018: #96 of 130 (3-9)2019: #88 of 130 (4-8)2020: #57 of 128 (3-4)2021: #33 of 130 (8-4)2022: #31 of 131 (9-4)2023: #31 of 133 (8-5)2024: #56 of 134 (5-7)2025: #78 of 136 (3-9) 2003 2025

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 100 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025 78 of 136 3–9 -2.66 Power
2024 56 of 134 5–7 4.00 Power
2023 31 of 133 8–5 8.69 Power
2022 31 of 131 9–4 10.30 Power
2021 33 of 130 8–4 9.95 Power
2020 57 of 128 3–4 2.46 Power
2019 88 of 130 4–8 1.23 MRI
2018 96 of 130 3–9 -3.16 MRI
2017 85 of 130 6–6 9.41 MRI
2016 74 of 128 4–8 12.78 MRI
2015 45 of 128 8–5 44.86 MRI
2014 16 of 128 10–3 65.70 MRI
2013 15 of 126 10–3 76.26 MRI
2012 38 of 124 9–5 46.95 MRI
2011 89 of 120 6–8 -1.57 MRI
2010 96 of 120 4–8 -12.80 MRI
2009 58 of 120 7–6 27.16 MRI
2008 94 of 120 4–8 -9.03 MRI
2007 47 of 120 6–7 37.38 MRI
2006 42 of 119 7–6 42.71 MRI
2005 34 of 119 10–2 45.92 MRI
2004 52 of 117 6–6 31.95 MRI
2003 63 of 117 6–7 27.62 MRI