The MRI
2026 · Week 11

Oregon State

Pac-12 · 5–4 · 3–2 in conference · MRI Classic #53

Power+0.8#64 of 138
Résumé-0.46#129 · wins above average
Playoff chance0.1%#46 most likely · -0.1 pts this week
Trendrating by week

Who to root for this week

Nothing this weekend moves the needle.

Nothing this weekend moves the needle.

Best winSan Diego State (66–14)
Worst lossFresno State (22–38)
Schedule faced-5.7 avg opponent
Schedule ahead+2.8 avg opponent
Roster talent#74 of 127 · worth -2.5, rated +0.8: in line with it
Returning production58% of last year's · #44 of 128
Home field+3.1 pts · 44th of 131
The Hidden Heisman Hidden HeismanBraden Atkinson · Week 3 · 2 in all

How this rating is built

Power = w × (average margin counted + average opponent rating) + (1 − w) × preseason prior, where w = games ÷ (games + 4). After 9 games, w is 69%, so the preseason prior is 31% of this rating. Every game played shrinks that share.

PartValueWeightAdds
Margin counted+10.2 avg× 69%+7.1
Opponents faced-5.7 avg× 69%-4.0
Preseason prior-7.4× 31%-2.3
Power+0.8

This explains how the model reached the number. The opponent ratings come out of the same fitted model, so it is not independent proof that the rating is right.

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the result against expectation. Adds is a different question: how many points of Power the game contributes, counting its margin and the strength of the opponent together. A game can beat expectation and still add little, or the reverse. Adds, plus the preseason prior, sum to Power (figures are rounded so the column adds up). Hover an Adds figure for its arithmetic.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerfAdds
1 at Houston L 20–33 -14.6 +1.6 -0.1
2 vs Texas Tech L 24–35 -10.3 -0.7 -0.2
3 vs Montana FCS W 52–17 +37.5 -2.5 +0.4
4 at UTEP W 33–7 +23.5 +2.5 +0.6
5 at Colorado State W 56–26 +11.0 +19.0 +1.8
6 vs San Diego State W 66–14 +11.1 +40.9 +2.8
7 vs Washington State W 48–30 +11.9 +6.1 +0.9
9 at Fresno State L 22–38 -2.8 -13.2 -1.3
10 vs Texas State L 21–42 -1.2 -19.8 -1.8
Preseason prior (31% of the rating)-2.3
Power+0.8

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
11 at Boise State -13.6 20%
12 vs Utah State +9.6 72%

The Hidden Heisman Hidden Heisman

The week’s biggest game from outside the power conferences, from a player the Heisman odds were not talking about. How it is picked.

SeasonWkPlayerOpponentLine
20263Braden Atkinsonvs Montana333 pass, 5 TD · 4 rush, 1 TD
20262Jesse Legreevs Texas Tech240 rece, 2 TD

Coaches

Mean added leaves out 1978–1980, the first seasons rated, which have no preseason prior to measure against.

CoachYearsRecordMean added
Craig Fertig1978–19794-17-1–
Joe Avezzano1980–19846-47-2-2.9
Dave Kragthorpe1985–199017-48-2-3.0
Jerry Pettibone1991–199613-52-1-2.0
Mike Riley1997–19988-14+4.0
Dennis Erickson1999–200231-17+4.7
Mike Riley2003–201485-66+1.6
Gary Andersen2015–20177-23-6.0
Jonathan Smith2018–202334-35+3.6
Trent Bray2024–20255-14-8.4
JaMarcus Shephard20265-4+2.3

Season by season

Best finish: #10 in 2000. 48 seasons rated. The two columns' numbers are not comparable; the rank within each is. Season links open that year's game log.

25 1 150 2003 (MRI Classic): #23 of 117 (8-5)2004 (MRI Classic): #25 of 117 (7-5)2005 (MRI Classic): #85 of 119 (5-6)2006 (MRI Classic): #37 of 119 (10-4)2007 (MRI Classic): #25 of 120 (9-4)2008 (MRI Classic): #18 of 120 (9-4)2009 (MRI Classic): #29 of 120 (8-5)2010 (MRI Classic): #59 of 120 (5-7)2011 (MRI Classic): #93 of 120 (3-9)2012 (MRI Classic): #27 of 124 (9-4)2013 (MRI Classic): #61 of 126 (7-6)2014 (MRI Classic): #88 of 128 (5-7)2015 (MRI Classic): #118 of 128 (2-10)2016 (MRI Classic): #86 of 128 (4-8)2017 (MRI Classic): #126 of 130 (1-11)2018 (MRI Classic): #126 of 130 (2-10)2019 (MRI Classic): #75 of 130 (5-7)1978 (MRI 2.0): #110 of 138 (3-8)1979 (MRI 2.0): #125 of 138 (1-10)1980 (MRI 2.0): #132 of 138 (0-11)1981 (MRI 2.0): #130 of 136 (1-10)1982 (MRI 2.0): #95 of 105 (1-10)1983 (MRI 2.0): #92 of 105 (2-9)1984 (MRI 2.0): #89 of 106 (2-9)1985 (MRI 2.0): #94 of 106 (3-8)1986 (MRI 2.0): #75 of 105 (3-8)1987 (MRI 2.0): #83 of 104 (2-9)1988 (MRI 2.0): #48 of 104 (4-7)1989 (MRI 2.0): #59 of 106 (4-8)1990 (MRI 2.0): #91 of 107 (1-10)1991 (MRI 2.0): #93 of 107 (1-10)1992 (MRI 2.0): #88 of 107 (1-10)1993 (MRI 2.0): #53 of 106 (4-7)1994 (MRI 2.0): #46 of 107 (4-7)1995 (MRI 2.0): #78 of 108 (1-10)1996 (MRI 2.0): #90 of 111 (2-9)1997 (MRI 2.0): #78 of 112 (3-8)1998 (MRI 2.0): #50 of 112 (5-6)1999 (MRI 2.0): #41 of 114 (7-5)2000 (MRI 2.0): #10 of 116 (11-1)2001 (MRI 2.0): #38 of 117 (5-6)2002 (MRI 2.0): #23 of 117 (8-5)2003 (MRI 2.0): #26 of 117 (8-5)2004 (MRI 2.0): #21 of 117 (7-5)2005 (MRI 2.0): #56 of 119 (5-6)2006 (MRI 2.0): #34 of 119 (10-4)2007 (MRI 2.0): #24 of 119 (9-4)2008 (MRI 2.0): #17 of 120 (9-4)2009 (MRI 2.0): #24 of 120 (8-5)2010 (MRI 2.0): #36 of 120 (5-7)2011 (MRI 2.0): #67 of 120 (3-9)2012 (MRI 2.0): #21 of 124 (9-4)2013 (MRI 2.0): #33 of 125 (7-6)2014 (MRI 2.0): #61 of 128 (5-7)2015 (MRI 2.0): #96 of 128 (2-10)2016 (MRI 2.0): #70 of 128 (4-8)2017 (MRI 2.0): #113 of 130 (1-11)2018 (MRI 2.0): #112 of 130 (2-10)2019 (MRI 2.0): #75 of 130 (5-7)2020 (MRI 2.0): #74 of 128 (2-5)2021 (MRI 2.0): #45 of 130 (7-6)2022 (MRI 2.0): #17 of 131 (10-3)2023 (MRI 2.0): #21 of 133 (8-5)2024 (MRI 2.0): #94 of 134 (5-7)2025 (MRI 2.0): #111 of 136 (2-10) MRI 2.0Classic 1978 2025

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 150 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Two lines where both ratings cover a season - MRI 2.0 in red, Classic in grey. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRec MRI 2.0MRI Classic
2025 2–10 #111 of 136 · -12.68 –
2024 5–7 #94 of 134 · -6.66 –
2023 8–5 #21 of 133 · 12.94 –
2022 10–3 #17 of 131 · 14.33 –
2021 7–6 #45 of 130 · 6.48 –
2020 2–5 #74 of 128 · -1.12 –
2019 5–7 #75 of 130 · -2.77 #75 of 130 · 11.78
2018 2–10 #112 of 130 · -16.14 #126 of 130 · -52.67
2017 1–11 #113 of 130 · -15.25 #126 of 130 · -63.95
2016 4–8 #70 of 128 · -2.25 #86 of 128 · 2.26
2015 2–10 #96 of 128 · -9.71 #118 of 128 · -42.72
2014 5–7 #61 of 128 · 0.37 #88 of 128 · 1.70
2013 7–6 #33 of 125 · 9.81 #61 of 126 · 28.73
2012 9–4 #21 of 124 · 13.15 #27 of 124 · 55.86
2011 3–9 #67 of 120 · -1.15 #93 of 120 · -10.68
2010 5–7 #36 of 120 · 8.65 #59 of 120 · 24.04
2009 8–5 #24 of 120 · 10.96 #29 of 120 · 50.20
2008 9–4 #17 of 120 · 14.17 #18 of 120 · 59.88
2007 9–4 #24 of 119 · 10.88 #25 of 120 · 55.28
2006 10–4 #34 of 119 · 7.76 #37 of 119 · 47.80
2005 5–6 #56 of 119 · 1.70 #85 of 119 · 8.95
2004 7–5 #21 of 117 · 12.24 #25 of 117 · 60.51
2003 8–5 #26 of 117 · 11.86 #23 of 117 · 67.16
2002 8–5 #23 of 117 · 11.70 –
2001 5–6 #38 of 117 · 7.59 –
2000 11–1 #10 of 116 · 16.83 –
1999 7–5 #41 of 114 · 4.83 –
1998 5–6 #50 of 112 · 1.48 –
1997 3–8 #78 of 112 · -6.72 –
1996 2–9 #90 of 111 · -12.37 –
1995 1–10 #78 of 108 · -7.59 –
1994 4–7 #46 of 107 · 3.08 –
1993 4–7 #53 of 106 · -1.10 –
1992 1–10 #88 of 107 · -9.50 –
1991 1–10 #93 of 107 · -14.82 –
1990 1–10 #91 of 107 · -14.14 –
1989 4–8 #59 of 106 · -2.54 –
1988 4–7 #48 of 104 · 1.18 –
1987 2–9 #83 of 104 · -11.90 –
1986 3–8 #75 of 105 · -8.43 –
1985 3–8 #94 of 106 · -14.59 –
1984 2–9 #89 of 106 · -10.00 –
1983 2–9 #92 of 105 · -14.87 –
1982 1–10 #95 of 105 · -15.67 –
1981 1–10 #130 of 136 · -22.39 –
1980 0–11 #132 of 138 · -20.05 –
1979 1–10 #125 of 138 · -16.47 –
1978 3–8 #110 of 138 · -9.66 –