The MRI
2026 · Week 11

Fresno State

Pac-12 · 5–4 · 2–3 in conference · MRI Classic #57

Power+0.7#65 of 138
Résumé-0.42#124 · wins above average
Playoff chance<0.1%out of the picture
Trendrating by week

Who to root for this week

Nothing this weekend moves the needle.

Nothing this weekend moves the needle.

Best winOregon State (38–22)
Worst lossSan Diego State (23–26)
Schedule faced-4.8 avg opponent
Schedule ahead-4.1 avg opponent
Roster talent#85 of 127 · worth -3.9, rated +0.7: in line with it
Returning production38% of last year's · #69 of 128
Home field+3.0 pts · 50th of 131

How this rating is built

Power = w × (average margin counted + average opponent rating) + (1 − w) × preseason prior, where w = games ÷ (games + 4). After 9 games, w is 69%, so the preseason prior is 31% of this rating. Every game played shrinks that share.

PartValueWeightAdds
Margin counted+7.6 avg× 69%+5.2
Opponents faced-4.8 avg× 69%-3.3
Preseason prior-4.0× 31%-1.2
Power+0.7

This explains how the model reached the number. The opponent ratings come out of the same fitted model, so it is not independent proof that the rating is right.

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the result against expectation. Adds is a different question: how many points of Power the game contributes, counting its margin and the strength of the opponent together. A game can beat expectation and still add little, or the reverse. Adds, plus the preseason prior, sum to Power (figures are rounded so the column adds up). Hover an Adds figure for its arithmetic.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerfAdds
1 at USC L 0–39 -19.8 -19.2 -1.6
2 vs Sacramento State W 49–3 +27.1 +18.9 +1.4
3 at San Jose State W 26–10 +10.3 +5.7 +0.8
4 vs Rice W 38–24 +19.6 -5.6 +0.0
5 at Washington State W 26–6 +5.7 +14.3 +1.5
6 vs Boise State L 31–38 -7.7 +0.7 -0.1
7 at San Diego State L 23–26 +4.8 -7.8 -0.6
9 vs Oregon State W 38–22 +2.8 +13.2 +1.4
10 at Utah State L 10–17 +3.4 -10.4 -0.9
Preseason prior (31% of the rating)-1.2
Power+0.7

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
11 at Texas State -7.4 33%
12 vs Colorado State +16.9 85%

Coaches

Mean added leaves out 1978–1980, the first seasons rated, which have no preseason prior to measure against.

CoachYearsRecordMean added
Bob Padilla1978–19797-15–
Jim Sweeney1980–1996129-67-3-0.1
Pat Hill1997–2011112-80+0.2
Tim DeRuyter2012–201630-30-3.3
Jeff Tedford2017–201926-14+5.0
Kalen DeBoer2020–202112-6+2.2
Jeff Tedford2022–202319-8+0.6
Tim Skipper20246-7-1.3
Matt Entz2025–202614-8+4.5

Season by season

Best finish: #10 in 2018. 48 seasons rated. The two columns' numbers are not comparable; the rank within each is. Season links open that year's game log.

25 1 150 2003 (MRI Classic): #64 of 117 (9-5)2004 (MRI Classic): #19 of 117 (9-3)2005 (MRI Classic): #26 of 119 (8-5)2006 (MRI Classic): #71 of 119 (4-8)2007 (MRI Classic): #51 of 120 (9-4)2008 (MRI Classic): #65 of 120 (7-6)2009 (MRI Classic): #62 of 120 (8-5)2010 (MRI Classic): #70 of 120 (8-5)2011 (MRI Classic): #94 of 120 (4-9)2012 (MRI Classic): #26 of 124 (9-4)2013 (MRI Classic): #28 of 126 (11-2)2014 (MRI Classic): #104 of 128 (6-8)2015 (MRI Classic): #119 of 128 (3-9)2016 (MRI Classic): #124 of 128 (1-11)2017 (MRI Classic): #33 of 130 (10-4)2018 (MRI Classic): #10 of 130 (12-2)2019 (MRI Classic): #82 of 130 (4-8)1978 (MRI 2.0): #115 of 138 (3-8)1979 (MRI 2.0): #114 of 138 (4-7)1980 (MRI 2.0): #114 of 138 (5-6)1981 (MRI 2.0): #111 of 136 (5-6)1982 (MRI 2.0): #63 of 105 (11-1)1983 (MRI 2.0): #85 of 105 (6-5)1984 (MRI 2.0): #78 of 106 (6-6)1985 (MRI 2.0): #32 of 106 (11-1)1986 (MRI 2.0): #47 of 105 (9-2)1987 (MRI 2.0): #56 of 104 (6-5)1988 (MRI 2.0): #40 of 104 (10-2)1989 (MRI 2.0): #40 of 106 (11-1)1990 (MRI 2.0): #53 of 107 (8-3)1991 (MRI 2.0): #36 of 107 (10-2)1992 (MRI 2.0): #24 of 107 (9-4)1993 (MRI 2.0): #28 of 106 (8-4)1994 (MRI 2.0): #60 of 107 (5-8)1995 (MRI 2.0): #69 of 108 (5-7)1996 (MRI 2.0): #82 of 111 (4-7)1997 (MRI 2.0): #68 of 112 (6-6)1998 (MRI 2.0): #58 of 112 (5-6)1999 (MRI 2.0): #52 of 114 (8-5)2000 (MRI 2.0): #54 of 116 (7-5)2001 (MRI 2.0): #22 of 117 (11-3)2002 (MRI 2.0): #61 of 117 (9-5)2003 (MRI 2.0): #66 of 117 (9-5)2004 (MRI 2.0): #26 of 117 (9-3)2005 (MRI 2.0): #28 of 119 (8-5)2006 (MRI 2.0): #70 of 119 (4-8)2007 (MRI 2.0): #58 of 119 (9-4)2008 (MRI 2.0): #75 of 120 (7-6)2009 (MRI 2.0): #62 of 120 (8-5)2010 (MRI 2.0): #71 of 120 (8-5)2011 (MRI 2.0): #85 of 120 (4-9)2012 (MRI 2.0): #42 of 124 (9-4)2013 (MRI 2.0): #45 of 125 (11-2)2014 (MRI 2.0): #82 of 128 (6-8)2015 (MRI 2.0): #105 of 128 (3-9)2016 (MRI 2.0): #121 of 128 (1-11)2017 (MRI 2.0): #63 of 130 (10-4)2018 (MRI 2.0): #22 of 130 (12-2)2019 (MRI 2.0): #73 of 130 (4-8)2020 (MRI 2.0): #98 of 128 (3-3)2021 (MRI 2.0): #53 of 130 (10-3)2022 (MRI 2.0): #48 of 131 (10-4)2023 (MRI 2.0): #69 of 133 (9-4)2024 (MRI 2.0): #81 of 134 (6-7)2025 (MRI 2.0): #77 of 136 (9-4) MRI 2.0Classic 1978 2025

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 150 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Two lines where both ratings cover a season - MRI 2.0 in red, Classic in grey. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRec MRI 2.0MRI Classic
2025 9–4 #77 of 136 · -2.59 –
2024 6–7 #81 of 134 · -3.08 –
2023 9–4 #69 of 133 · -1.93 –
2022 10–4 #48 of 131 · 5.64 –
2021 10–3 #53 of 130 · 4.56 –
2020 3–3 #98 of 128 · -7.33 –
2019 4–8 #73 of 130 · -2.26 #82 of 130 · 7.69
2018 12–2 #22 of 130 · 13.12 #10 of 130 · 79.91
2017 10–4 #63 of 130 · 1.89 #33 of 130 · 54.57
2016 1–11 #121 of 128 · -18.97 #124 of 128 · -47.37
2015 3–9 #105 of 128 · -15.37 #119 of 128 · -43.52
2014 6–8 #82 of 128 · -5.71 #104 of 128 · -13.13
2013 11–2 #45 of 125 · 6.70 #28 of 126 · 56.62
2012 9–4 #42 of 124 · 6.42 #26 of 124 · 56.83
2011 4–9 #85 of 120 · -8.16 #94 of 120 · -10.83
2010 8–5 #71 of 120 · -2.98 #70 of 120 · 17.42
2009 8–5 #62 of 120 · -1.06 #62 of 120 · 25.27
2008 7–6 #75 of 120 · -4.21 #65 of 120 · 19.56
2007 9–4 #58 of 119 · 1.41 #51 of 120 · 36.09
2006 4–8 #70 of 119 · -4.21 #71 of 119 · 9.65
2005 8–5 #28 of 119 · 10.90 #26 of 119 · 56.51
2004 9–3 #26 of 117 · 9.75 #19 of 117 · 71.00
2003 9–5 #66 of 117 · -1.89 #64 of 117 · 27.27
2002 9–5 #61 of 117 · 1.71 –
2001 11–3 #22 of 117 · 11.25 –
2000 7–5 #54 of 116 · 3.75 –
1999 8–5 #52 of 114 · 2.49 –
1998 5–6 #58 of 112 · -1.31 –
1997 6–6 #68 of 112 · -3.21 –
1996 4–7 #82 of 111 · -9.20 –
1995 5–7 #69 of 108 · -4.63 –
1994 5–8 #60 of 107 · -1.00 –
1993 8–4 #28 of 106 · 9.22 –
1992 9–4 #24 of 107 · 8.97 –
1991 10–2 #36 of 107 · 4.83 –
1990 8–3 #53 of 107 · -0.09 –
1989 11–1 #40 of 106 · 3.86 –
1988 10–2 #40 of 104 · 3.02 –
1987 6–5 #56 of 104 · -2.25 –
1986 9–2 #47 of 105 · 1.84 –
1985 11–1 #32 of 106 · 6.70 –
1984 6–6 #78 of 106 · -7.59 –
1983 6–5 #85 of 105 · -9.73 –
1982 11–1 #63 of 105 · -3.98 –
1981 5–6 #111 of 136 · -9.28 –
1980 5–6 #114 of 138 · -11.27 –
1979 4–7 #114 of 138 · -9.22 –
1978 3–8 #115 of 138 · -10.82 –