The MRI
2026 · Week 2

Utah State

Pac-12 · 0–2 · MRI Classic #134

Power-8.0#91 of 138
Résumé-1.05#208 · wins above average
Movement+20up from #111 last week
Worst lossIdaho State (17–29)
Schedule faced-11.2 avg opponent
Schedule ahead-0.2 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 vs Idaho State FCS L 17–29 +30.9 -42.9
2 at Washington L 14–16 -24.5 +22.5

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
3 at Utah -38.7 1%
4 vs Troy +7.4 67%
5 at Boise State -23.2 8%
6 vs Washington State -4.8 39%
8 at Texas State -7.0 34%
9 vs Colorado State +6.4 65%
10 vs Fresno State -3.3 42%
11 at San Diego State -10.7 26%

Season by season

Best finish: #11 in 2018. 23 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 150 2003: #92 of 117 (3-9)2004: #109 of 117 (3-8)2005: #105 of 119 (3-8)2006: #118 of 119 (1-11)2007: #106 of 120 (2-10)2008: #97 of 120 (3-9)2009: #80 of 120 (4-8)2010: #100 of 120 (4-8)2011: #49 of 120 (7-6)2012: #11 of 124 (11-2)2013: #30 of 126 (9-5)2014: #33 of 128 (10-4)2015: #65 of 128 (6-7)2016: #89 of 128 (3-9)2017: #79 of 130 (6-6)2018: #11 of 130 (11-2)2019: #77 of 130 (7-6)2020: #113 of 128 (1-5)2021: #63 of 130 (11-3)2022: #105 of 131 (6-7)2023: #107 of 133 (6-7)2024: #110 of 134 (4-8)2025: #86 of 136 (6-7) 2003 2025

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 150 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025 86 of 136 6–7 -5.01 Power
2024 110 of 134 4–8 -12.54 Power
2023 107 of 133 6–7 -9.72 Power
2022 105 of 131 6–7 -9.51 Power
2021 63 of 130 11–3 1.96 Power
2020 113 of 128 1–5 -13.91 Power
2019 77 of 130 7–6 9.71 MRI
2018 11 of 130 11–2 77.32 MRI
2017 79 of 130 6–6 16.52 MRI
2016 89 of 128 3–9 -1.45 MRI
2015 65 of 128 6–7 24.20 MRI
2014 33 of 128 10–4 45.04 MRI
2013 30 of 126 9–5 56.33 MRI
2012 11 of 124 11–2 74.56 MRI
2011 49 of 120 7–6 31.58 MRI
2010 100 of 120 4–8 -18.60 MRI
2009 80 of 120 4–8 5.69 MRI
2008 97 of 120 3–9 -11.22 MRI
2007 106 of 120 2–10 -21.63 MRI
2006 118 of 119 1–11 -68.33 MRI
2005 105 of 119 3–8 -23.80 MRI
2004 109 of 117 3–8 -29.05 MRI
2003 92 of 117 3–9 -9.72 MRI