The MRI
2026 · Week 11

Purdue

Big Ten · 3–6 · 2–4 in conference · MRI Classic #92

Power+0.3#68 of 138
Résumé-0.08#80 · wins above average
Playoff chance<0.1%out of the picture
Trendrating by week

Who to root for this week

Nothing this weekend moves the needle.

Nothing this weekend moves the needle.

Best winIllinois (24–17)
Worst lossMaryland (29–34)
Schedule faced+5.5 avg opponent
Schedule ahead+15.2 avg opponent
Roster talent#53 of 127 · worth +0.8, rated +0.3: in line with it
Returning production48% of last year's · #56 of 128
Home field+1.9 pts · 129th of 131

How this rating is built

Power = w × (average margin counted + average opponent rating) + (1 − w) × preseason prior, where w = games ÷ (games + 4). After 9 games, w is 69%, so the preseason prior is 31% of this rating. Every game played shrinks that share.

PartValueWeightAdds
Margin counted-4.3 avg× 69%-3.0
Opponents faced+5.5 avg× 69%+3.8
Preseason prior-1.6× 31%-0.5
Power+0.3

This explains how the model reached the number. The opponent ratings come out of the same fitted model, so it is not independent proof that the rating is right.

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the result against expectation. Adds is a different question: how many points of Power the game contributes, counting its margin and the strength of the opponent together. A game can beat expectation and still add little, or the reverse. Adds, plus the preseason prior, sum to Power (figures are rounded so the column adds up). Hover an Adds figure for its arithmetic.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerfAdds
1 vs Indiana State FCS W 44–19 +37.0 -12.0 -1.1
2 vs Wake Forest L 36–38 -10.6 +8.6 +0.7
3 at UCLA L 38–52 -20.1 +6.1 +0.2
4 vs Notre Dame L 10–49 -26.2 -12.8 -1.1
5 at Illinois W 24–17 -10.5 +17.5 +1.5
6 vs Minnesota W 41–13 -0.0 +28.0 +2.6
7 vs Washington L 26–38 -5.1 -6.9 -0.8
9 at Penn State L 17–31 -14.3 +0.3 -0.3
10 vs Maryland L 29–34 +4.9 -9.9 -0.9
Preseason prior (31% of the rating)-0.5
Power+0.3

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
11 at Iowa -18.0 14%
12 vs Wisconsin -6.4 35%
13 at Indiana -23.1 8%

Coaches

Mean added leaves out 1978–1980, the first seasons rated, which have no preseason prior to measure against.

CoachYearsRecordMean added
Jim Young1978–198133-13-1-2.2
Leon Burtnett1982–198621-34-1-2.6
Fred Akers1987–199012-31-1-2.2
Jim Colletto1991–199620-43-3+1.4
Joe Tiller1997–200887-62+2.6
Danny Hope2009–201219-24-1.8
Darrell Hazell2013–20169-33-6.1
Jeff Brohm2017–202236-34+3.8
Ryan Walters2023–20245-19-7.1
Barry Odom2025–20265-16-0.1

Season by season

Best finish: #11 in 1998. 48 seasons rated. The two columns' numbers are not comparable; the rank within each is. Season links open that year's game log.

25 1 150 2003 (MRI Classic): #22 of 117 (9-4)2004 (MRI Classic): #20 of 117 (7-5)2005 (MRI Classic): #53 of 119 (5-6)2006 (MRI Classic): #68 of 119 (8-6)2007 (MRI Classic): #43 of 120 (8-5)2008 (MRI Classic): #80 of 120 (4-8)2009 (MRI Classic): #65 of 120 (5-7)2010 (MRI Classic): #89 of 120 (4-8)2011 (MRI Classic): #70 of 120 (7-6)2012 (MRI Classic): #85 of 124 (6-7)2013 (MRI Classic): #116 of 126 (1-11)2014 (MRI Classic): #106 of 128 (3-9)2015 (MRI Classic): #112 of 128 (2-10)2016 (MRI Classic): #119 of 128 (3-9)2017 (MRI Classic): #36 of 130 (7-6)2018 (MRI Classic): #54 of 130 (6-7)2019 (MRI Classic): #94 of 130 (4-8)1978 (MRI 2.0): #29 of 138 (9-3)1979 (MRI 2.0): #36 of 138 (10-2)1980 (MRI 2.0): #25 of 138 (9-3)1981 (MRI 2.0): #44 of 136 (5-6)1982 (MRI 2.0): #72 of 105 (3-8)1983 (MRI 2.0): #69 of 105 (3-8)1984 (MRI 2.0): #48 of 106 (7-5)1985 (MRI 2.0): #43 of 106 (5-6)1986 (MRI 2.0): #72 of 105 (3-8)1987 (MRI 2.0): #65 of 104 (3-8)1988 (MRI 2.0): #82 of 104 (4-7)1989 (MRI 2.0): #71 of 106 (3-8)1990 (MRI 2.0): #76 of 107 (2-9)1991 (MRI 2.0): #60 of 107 (4-7)1992 (MRI 2.0): #55 of 107 (4-7)1993 (MRI 2.0): #67 of 106 (1-10)1994 (MRI 2.0): #48 of 107 (4-7)1995 (MRI 2.0): #30 of 108 (4-7)1996 (MRI 2.0): #49 of 111 (3-8)1997 (MRI 2.0): #26 of 112 (9-3)1998 (MRI 2.0): #11 of 112 (9-4)1999 (MRI 2.0): #13 of 114 (7-5)2000 (MRI 2.0): #18 of 116 (8-4)2001 (MRI 2.0): #44 of 117 (6-6)2002 (MRI 2.0): #35 of 117 (7-6)2003 (MRI 2.0): #21 of 117 (9-4)2004 (MRI 2.0): #14 of 117 (7-5)2005 (MRI 2.0): #30 of 119 (5-6)2006 (MRI 2.0): #56 of 119 (8-6)2007 (MRI 2.0): #47 of 119 (8-5)2008 (MRI 2.0): #57 of 120 (4-8)2009 (MRI 2.0): #59 of 120 (5-7)2010 (MRI 2.0): #87 of 120 (4-8)2011 (MRI 2.0): #76 of 120 (7-6)2012 (MRI 2.0): #70 of 124 (6-7)2013 (MRI 2.0): #109 of 125 (1-11)2014 (MRI 2.0): #94 of 128 (3-9)2015 (MRI 2.0): #97 of 128 (2-10)2016 (MRI 2.0): #111 of 128 (3-9)2017 (MRI 2.0): #45 of 130 (7-6)2018 (MRI 2.0): #36 of 130 (6-7)2019 (MRI 2.0): #59 of 130 (4-8)2020 (MRI 2.0): #59 of 128 (2-4)2021 (MRI 2.0): #24 of 130 (9-4)2022 (MRI 2.0): #44 of 131 (8-6)2023 (MRI 2.0): #65 of 133 (4-8)2024 (MRI 2.0): #106 of 134 (1-11)2025 (MRI 2.0): #88 of 136 (2-10) MRI 2.0Classic 1978 2025

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 150 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Two lines where both ratings cover a season - MRI 2.0 in red, Classic in grey. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRec MRI 2.0MRI Classic
2025 2–10 #88 of 136 · -5.58 –
2024 1–11 #106 of 134 · -10.08 –
2023 4–8 #65 of 133 · 0.30 –
2022 8–6 #44 of 131 · 6.55 –
2021 9–4 #24 of 130 · 12.44 –
2020 2–4 #59 of 128 · 2.10 –
2019 4–8 #59 of 130 · 0.93 #94 of 130 · -2.30
2018 6–7 #36 of 130 · 7.94 #54 of 130 · 28.43
2017 7–6 #45 of 130 · 5.30 #36 of 130 · 48.20
2016 3–9 #111 of 128 · -14.32 #119 of 128 · -36.71
2015 2–10 #97 of 128 · -10.71 #112 of 128 · -30.58
2014 3–9 #94 of 128 · -10.41 #106 of 128 · -19.56
2013 1–11 #109 of 125 · -16.55 #116 of 126 · -49.70
2012 6–7 #70 of 124 · -2.74 #85 of 124 · -0.12
2011 7–6 #76 of 120 · -3.55 #70 of 120 · 15.96
2010 4–8 #87 of 120 · -7.91 #89 of 120 · -3.72
2009 5–7 #59 of 120 · 0.39 #65 of 120 · 20.39
2008 4–8 #57 of 120 · 1.05 #80 of 120 · 8.25
2007 8–5 #47 of 119 · 5.20 #43 of 120 · 43.84
2006 8–6 #56 of 119 · 1.12 #68 of 119 · 11.87
2005 5–6 #30 of 119 · 8.69 #53 of 119 · 33.38
2004 7–5 #14 of 117 · 15.49 #20 of 117 · 70.25
2003 9–4 #21 of 117 · 12.71 #22 of 117 · 67.36
2002 7–6 #35 of 117 · 7.71 –
2001 6–6 #44 of 117 · 5.80 –
2000 8–4 #18 of 116 · 13.74 –
1999 7–5 #13 of 114 · 13.89 –
1998 9–4 #11 of 112 · 17.27 –
1997 9–3 #26 of 112 · 10.84 –
1996 3–8 #49 of 111 · 1.59 –
1995 4–7 #30 of 108 · 8.95 –
1994 4–7 #48 of 107 · 2.92 –
1993 1–10 #67 of 106 · -3.97 –
1992 4–7 #55 of 107 · -0.69 –
1991 4–7 #60 of 107 · -2.26 –
1990 2–9 #76 of 107 · -7.93 –
1989 3–8 #71 of 106 · -6.47 –
1988 4–7 #82 of 104 · -11.03 –
1987 3–8 #65 of 104 · -4.90 –
1986 3–8 #72 of 105 · -7.61 –
1985 5–6 #43 of 106 · 3.31 –
1984 7–5 #48 of 106 · 2.01 –
1983 3–8 #69 of 105 · -4.67 –
1982 3–8 #72 of 105 · -5.65 –
1981 5–6 #44 of 136 · 4.97 –
1980 9–3 #25 of 138 · 10.59 –
1979 10–2 #36 of 138 · 7.04 –
1978 9–3 #29 of 138 · 8.76 –