The MRI
2026 · Week 11

Illinois

Big Ten · 6–3 · 4–2 in conference · MRI Classic #56

Power+7.8#41 of 138
Résumé+2.15#29 · wins above average
Playoff chance0.8%#38 most likely · +0.1 pts this week
Trendrating by week

Who to root for this week

Nothing this weekend moves the needle.

Nothing this weekend moves the needle.

Best winOregon (21–10)
Worst lossPurdue (17–24)
Schedule faced+3.3 avg opponent
Schedule ahead+14.9 avg opponent
Roster talent#50 of 127 · worth +1.1, rated +7.8: beating it
Returning production21% of last year's · #93 of 128 · counted against its preseason rating
Home field+2.5 pts · 104th of 131

How this rating is built

Power = w × (average margin counted + average opponent rating) + (1 − w) × preseason prior, where w = games ÷ (games + 4). After 9 games, w is 69%, so the preseason prior is 31% of this rating. Every game played shrinks that share.

PartValueWeightAdds
Margin counted+5.2 avg× 69%+3.6
Opponents faced+3.3 avg× 69%+2.2
Preseason prior+6.4× 31%+2.0
Power+7.8

This explains how the model reached the number. The opponent ratings come out of the same fitted model, so it is not independent proof that the rating is right.

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the result against expectation. Adds is a different question: how many points of Power the game contributes, counting its margin and the strength of the opponent together. A game can beat expectation and still add little, or the reverse. Adds, plus the preseason prior, sum to Power (figures are rounded so the column adds up). Hover an Adds figure for its arithmetic.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerfAdds
1 vs UAB W 42–23 +21.4 -2.4 +0.8
2 vs Duke L 27–31 +0.9 -4.9 +0.1
3 vs Southern Illinois FCS W 48–10 +44.5 -6.5 +0.4
4 at Ohio State L 19–42 -21.9 -1.1 +0.1
5 vs Purdue L 17–24 +10.5 -17.5 -0.9
6 at Michigan State W 38–37 +2.9 -1.9 +0.5
8 vs Oregon W 21–10 -11.2 +22.2 +2.6
9 at Maryland W 20–17 +6.4 -3.4 +0.4
10 vs Nebraska W 24–13 -1.6 +12.7 +1.8
Preseason prior (31% of the rating)+2.0
Power+7.8

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
11 at UCLA -12.5 22%
12 vs Iowa -4.4 39%
13 at Northwestern -7.2 33%

Coaches

Mean added leaves out 1978–1980, the first seasons rated, which have no preseason prior to measure against.

CoachYearsRecordMean added
Gary Moeller1978–19793-16-3–
Mike White1980–198747-41-3+2.1
John Mackovic1988–199130-16-1+4.9
Lou Tepper1992–199625-30-2-0.2
Ron Turner1997–200435-57-1.0
Ron Zook2005–201134-51+0.6
Tim Beckman2012–201412-25-4.9
Bill Cubit20155-7+2.3
Lovie Smith2016–202017-39-3.7
Bret Bielema2021–202643-29+4.3

Season by season

Best finish: #13 in 1994. 48 seasons rated. The two columns' numbers are not comparable; the rank within each is. Season links open that year's game log.

25 1 150 2003 (MRI Classic): #104 of 117 (1-11)2004 (MRI Classic): #98 of 117 (3-8)2005 (MRI Classic): #112 of 119 (2-9)2006 (MRI Classic): #90 of 119 (2-10)2007 (MRI Classic): #37 of 120 (9-4)2008 (MRI Classic): #62 of 120 (5-7)2009 (MRI Classic): #93 of 120 (3-9)2010 (MRI Classic): #31 of 120 (7-6)2011 (MRI Classic): #62 of 120 (7-6)2012 (MRI Classic): #113 of 124 (2-10)2013 (MRI Classic): #93 of 126 (4-8)2014 (MRI Classic): #98 of 128 (6-7)2015 (MRI Classic): #72 of 128 (5-7)2016 (MRI Classic): #108 of 128 (3-9)2017 (MRI Classic): #112 of 130 (2-10)2018 (MRI Classic): #109 of 130 (4-8)2019 (MRI Classic): #72 of 130 (6-7)1978 (MRI 2.0): #133 of 138 (1-10)1979 (MRI 2.0): #122 of 138 (2-9)1980 (MRI 2.0): #96 of 138 (3-8)1981 (MRI 2.0): #50 of 136 (7-4)1982 (MRI 2.0): #28 of 105 (7-5)1983 (MRI 2.0): #16 of 105 (10-2)1984 (MRI 2.0): #16 of 106 (7-4)1985 (MRI 2.0): #34 of 106 (6-6)1986 (MRI 2.0): #58 of 105 (4-7)1987 (MRI 2.0): #55 of 104 (3-8)1988 (MRI 2.0): #45 of 104 (6-6)1989 (MRI 2.0): #17 of 106 (10-2)1990 (MRI 2.0): #27 of 107 (8-4)1991 (MRI 2.0): #25 of 107 (6-6)1992 (MRI 2.0): #42 of 107 (6-6)1993 (MRI 2.0): #41 of 106 (5-6)1994 (MRI 2.0): #13 of 107 (7-5)1995 (MRI 2.0): #25 of 108 (5-6)1996 (MRI 2.0): #62 of 111 (2-9)1997 (MRI 2.0): #89 of 112 (0-11)1998 (MRI 2.0): #90 of 112 (3-8)1999 (MRI 2.0): #34 of 114 (8-4)2000 (MRI 2.0): #43 of 116 (5-6)2001 (MRI 2.0): #16 of 117 (10-2)2002 (MRI 2.0): #44 of 117 (5-7)2003 (MRI 2.0): #83 of 117 (1-11)2004 (MRI 2.0): #83 of 117 (3-8)2005 (MRI 2.0): #100 of 119 (2-9)2006 (MRI 2.0): #90 of 119 (2-10)2007 (MRI 2.0): #43 of 119 (9-4)2008 (MRI 2.0): #48 of 120 (5-7)2009 (MRI 2.0): #73 of 120 (3-9)2010 (MRI 2.0): #37 of 120 (7-6)2011 (MRI 2.0): #52 of 120 (7-6)2012 (MRI 2.0): #96 of 124 (2-10)2013 (MRI 2.0): #88 of 125 (4-8)2014 (MRI 2.0): #85 of 128 (6-7)2015 (MRI 2.0): #78 of 128 (5-7)2016 (MRI 2.0): #93 of 128 (3-9)2017 (MRI 2.0): #106 of 130 (2-10)2018 (MRI 2.0): #102 of 130 (4-8)2019 (MRI 2.0): #78 of 130 (6-7)2020 (MRI 2.0): #84 of 128 (2-6)2021 (MRI 2.0): #63 of 130 (5-7)2022 (MRI 2.0): #21 of 131 (8-5)2023 (MRI 2.0): #64 of 133 (5-7)2024 (MRI 2.0): #36 of 134 (10-3)2025 (MRI 2.0): #28 of 136 (9-4) MRI 2.0Classic 1978 2025

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 150 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Two lines where both ratings cover a season - MRI 2.0 in red, Classic in grey. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRec MRI 2.0MRI Classic
2025 9–4 #28 of 136 · 11.03 –
2024 10–3 #36 of 134 · 8.37 –
2023 5–7 #64 of 133 · 0.81 –
2022 8–5 #21 of 131 · 12.58 –
2021 5–7 #63 of 130 · 2.92 –
2020 2–6 #84 of 128 · -3.94 –
2019 6–7 #78 of 130 · -3.35 #72 of 130 · 12.27
2018 4–8 #102 of 130 · -12.36 #109 of 130 · -28.25
2017 2–10 #106 of 130 · -13.37 #112 of 130 · -25.14
2016 3–9 #93 of 128 · -9.34 #108 of 128 · -23.81
2015 5–7 #78 of 128 · -2.55 #72 of 128 · 16.52
2014 6–7 #85 of 128 · -6.76 #98 of 128 · -8.57
2013 4–8 #88 of 125 · -7.85 #93 of 126 · -8.09
2012 2–10 #96 of 124 · -11.07 #113 of 124 · -36.49
2011 7–6 #52 of 120 · 2.41 #62 of 120 · 24.59
2010 7–6 #37 of 120 · 7.29 #31 of 120 · 54.09
2009 3–9 #73 of 120 · -3.61 #93 of 120 · -3.82
2008 5–7 #48 of 120 · 3.39 #62 of 120 · 23.18
2007 9–4 #43 of 119 · 5.84 #37 of 120 · 49.76
2006 2–10 #90 of 119 · -8.80 #90 of 119 · -1.96
2005 2–9 #100 of 119 · -14.44 #112 of 119 · -37.62
2004 3–8 #83 of 117 · -8.09 #98 of 117 · -13.05
2003 1–11 #83 of 117 · -8.55 #104 of 117 · -31.64
2002 5–7 #44 of 117 · 5.82 –
2001 10–2 #16 of 117 · 12.49 –
2000 5–6 #43 of 116 · 5.37 –
1999 8–4 #34 of 114 · 7.93 –
1998 3–8 #90 of 112 · -11.86 –
1997 0–11 #89 of 112 · -12.75 –
1996 2–9 #62 of 111 · -2.79 –
1995 5–6 #25 of 108 · 10.23 –
1994 7–5 #13 of 107 · 15.19 –
1993 5–6 #41 of 106 · 3.99 –
1992 6–6 #42 of 107 · 2.31 –
1991 6–6 #25 of 107 · 10.02 –
1990 8–4 #27 of 107 · 9.74 –
1989 10–2 #17 of 106 · 14.62 –
1988 6–6 #45 of 104 · 1.75 –
1987 3–8 #55 of 104 · -2.13 –
1986 4–7 #58 of 105 · -0.79 –
1985 6–6 #34 of 106 · 6.24 –
1984 7–4 #16 of 106 · 11.53 –
1983 10–2 #16 of 105 · 13.32 –
1982 7–5 #28 of 105 · 8.79 –
1981 7–4 #50 of 136 · 3.03 –
1980 3–8 #96 of 138 · -6.30 –
1979 2–9 #122 of 138 · -12.09 –
1978 1–10 #133 of 138 · -16.16 –