The MRI
2026 · Week 11

Army

American · 5–4 · 4–2 in conference · MRI Classic #59

Power+0.3#70 of 138
Résumé-0.71#147 · wins above average
Playoff chance0.1%#49 most likely
Trendrating by week

Who to root for this week

Nothing this weekend moves the needle.

Nothing this weekend moves the needle.

Best winTulsa (38–35)
Worst lossAir Force (21–24)
Schedule faced-6.9 avg opponent
Schedule ahead-8.5 avg opponent
Roster talentnot comparable — recruiting rankings do not measure the service academies
Returning production80% of last year's · #12 of 128
Home field+2.2 pts · 119th of 131

How this rating is built

Power = w × (average margin counted + average opponent rating) + (1 − w) × preseason prior, where w = games ÷ (games + 4). After 9 games, w is 69%, so the preseason prior is 31% of this rating. Every game played shrinks that share.

PartValueWeightAdds
Margin counted+5.6 avg× 69%+3.9
Opponents faced-6.9 avg× 69%-4.8
Preseason prior+3.9× 31%+1.2
Power+0.3

This explains how the model reached the number. The opponent ratings come out of the same fitted model, so it is not independent proof that the rating is right.

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the result against expectation. Adds is a different question: how many points of Power the game contributes, counting its margin and the strength of the opponent together. A game can beat expectation and still add little, or the reverse. Adds, plus the preseason prior, sum to Power (figures are rounded so the column adds up). Hover an Adds figure for its arithmetic.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerfAdds
1 vs Bryant FCS W 59–3 +37.0 +19.0 +0.7
2 vs USF L 24–28 +1.9 -5.9 -0.5
4 at Temple W 21–17 +8.4 -4.4 -0.2
5 at Louisiana Tech L 29–31 -3.0 +1.0 +0.0
6 vs Tulane W 20–17 +11.5 -8.5 -0.6
7 vs Florida Atlantic W 56–24 +9.3 +22.7 +2.1
8 at Tulsa W 38–35 -0.6 +3.6 +0.4
9 at Memphis L 22–49 -6.7 -20.3 -1.9
10 vs Air Force L 21–24 +7.3 -10.3 -0.9
Preseason prior (31% of the rating)+1.2
Power+0.3

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
12 vs East Carolina +8.9 70%
13 at Rice +13.2 79%
15 N Navy +4.3 60%

Coaches

Mean added leaves out 1978–1980, the first seasons rated, which have no preseason prior to measure against.

CoachYearsRecordMean added
Homer Smith19784-6-1–
Lou Saban19792-8-1–
Ed Cavanaugh1980–198210-21-2-6.1
Jim Young1983–199051-39-1-1.5
Bob Sutton1991–199944-55-1-2.7
Todd Berry2000–20035-35-9.7
Bobby Ross2004–20069-25-1.9
Stan Brock2007–20086-18-6.8
Rich Ellerson2009–201320-41-4.0
Jeff Monken2014–202694-67+0.4

Season by season

Best finish: #19 in 2018. 48 seasons rated. The two columns' numbers are not comparable; the rank within each is. Season links open that year's game log.

25 1 150 2003 (MRI Classic): #117 of 117 (0-13)2004 (MRI Classic): #99 of 117 (2-9)2005 (MRI Classic): #90 of 119 (4-7)2006 (MRI Classic): #109 of 119 (3-9)2007 (MRI Classic): #114 of 120 (3-9)2008 (MRI Classic): #108 of 120 (3-9)2009 (MRI Classic): #99 of 120 (5-7)2010 (MRI Classic): #50 of 120 (7-6)2011 (MRI Classic): #95 of 120 (3-9)2012 (MRI Classic): #110 of 124 (2-10)2013 (MRI Classic): #107 of 126 (3-9)2014 (MRI Classic): #108 of 128 (4-8)2015 (MRI Classic): #105 of 128 (2-10)2016 (MRI Classic): #53 of 128 (8-5)2017 (MRI Classic): #38 of 130 (10-3)2018 (MRI Classic): #19 of 130 (11-2)2019 (MRI Classic): #71 of 130 (5-8)1978 (MRI 2.0): #112 of 138 (4-7)1979 (MRI 2.0): #123 of 138 (2-9)1980 (MRI 2.0): #110 of 138 (3-8)1981 (MRI 2.0): #116 of 136 (3-8)1982 (MRI 2.0): #96 of 105 (4-7)1983 (MRI 2.0): #101 of 105 (2-9)1984 (MRI 2.0): #69 of 106 (8-4)1985 (MRI 2.0): #41 of 106 (9-3)1986 (MRI 2.0): #66 of 105 (6-5)1987 (MRI 2.0): #76 of 104 (5-6)1988 (MRI 2.0): #60 of 104 (9-3)1989 (MRI 2.0): #65 of 106 (6-5)1990 (MRI 2.0): #83 of 107 (6-5)1991 (MRI 2.0): #92 of 107 (4-7)1992 (MRI 2.0): #96 of 107 (5-6)1993 (MRI 2.0): #90 of 106 (6-5)1994 (MRI 2.0): #91 of 107 (4-7)1995 (MRI 2.0): #59 of 108 (5-6)1996 (MRI 2.0): #39 of 111 (10-2)1997 (MRI 2.0): #86 of 112 (4-7)1998 (MRI 2.0): #83 of 112 (3-8)1999 (MRI 2.0): #92 of 114 (3-8)2000 (MRI 2.0): #97 of 116 (1-10)2001 (MRI 2.0): #102 of 117 (3-8)2002 (MRI 2.0): #116 of 117 (1-11)2003 (MRI 2.0): #117 of 117 (0-13)2004 (MRI 2.0): #106 of 117 (2-9)2005 (MRI 2.0): #97 of 119 (4-7)2006 (MRI 2.0): #106 of 119 (3-9)2007 (MRI 2.0): #111 of 119 (3-9)2008 (MRI 2.0): #113 of 120 (3-9)2009 (MRI 2.0): #110 of 120 (5-7)2010 (MRI 2.0): #85 of 120 (7-6)2011 (MRI 2.0): #91 of 120 (3-9)2012 (MRI 2.0): #113 of 124 (2-10)2013 (MRI 2.0): #111 of 125 (3-9)2014 (MRI 2.0): #117 of 128 (4-8)2015 (MRI 2.0): #107 of 128 (2-10)2016 (MRI 2.0): #80 of 128 (8-5)2017 (MRI 2.0): #64 of 130 (10-3)2018 (MRI 2.0): #41 of 130 (11-2)2019 (MRI 2.0): #74 of 130 (5-8)2020 (MRI 2.0): #63 of 128 (9-3)2021 (MRI 2.0): #51 of 130 (9-4)2022 (MRI 2.0): #71 of 131 (6-6)2023 (MRI 2.0): #89 of 133 (6-6)2024 (MRI 2.0): #41 of 134 (12-2)2025 (MRI 2.0): #70 of 136 (7-6) MRI 2.0Classic 1978 2025

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 150 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Two lines where both ratings cover a season - MRI 2.0 in red, Classic in grey. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRec MRI 2.0MRI Classic
2025 7–6 #70 of 136 · -1.11 –
2024 12–2 #41 of 134 · 7.30 –
2023 6–6 #89 of 133 · -5.20 –
2022 6–6 #71 of 131 · -1.49 –
2021 9–4 #51 of 130 · 5.05 –
2020 9–3 #63 of 128 · 1.66 –
2019 5–8 #74 of 130 · -2.75 #71 of 130 · 12.34
2018 11–2 #41 of 130 · 6.60 #19 of 130 · 65.08
2017 10–3 #64 of 130 · 1.51 #38 of 130 · 46.92
2016 8–5 #80 of 128 · -5.08 #53 of 128 · 29.42
2015 2–10 #107 of 128 · -16.71 #105 of 128 · -18.82
2014 4–8 #117 of 128 · -17.50 #108 of 128 · -20.48
2013 3–9 #111 of 125 · -16.92 #107 of 126 · -24.16
2012 2–10 #113 of 124 · -17.51 #110 of 124 · -29.96
2011 3–9 #91 of 120 · -9.36 #95 of 120 · -10.87
2010 7–6 #85 of 120 · -7.51 #50 of 120 · 29.49
2009 5–7 #110 of 120 · -16.98 #99 of 120 · -6.88
2008 3–9 #113 of 120 · -18.41 #108 of 120 · -27.02
2007 3–9 #111 of 119 · -17.05 #114 of 120 · -38.63
2006 3–9 #106 of 119 · -14.42 #109 of 119 · -32.90
2005 4–7 #97 of 119 · -13.07 #90 of 119 · 3.02
2004 2–9 #106 of 117 · -18.46 #99 of 117 · -15.94
2003 0–13 #117 of 117 · -27.15 #117 of 117 · -75.76
2002 1–11 #116 of 117 · -25.98 –
2001 3–8 #102 of 117 · -16.43 –
2000 1–10 #97 of 116 · -15.26 –
1999 3–8 #92 of 114 · -10.26 –
1998 3–8 #83 of 112 · -8.33 –
1997 4–7 #86 of 112 · -11.85 –
1996 10–2 #39 of 111 · 6.09 –
1995 5–6 #59 of 108 · -0.85 –
1994 4–7 #91 of 107 · -15.07 –
1993 6–5 #90 of 106 · -13.21 –
1992 5–6 #96 of 107 · -14.05 –
1991 4–7 #92 of 107 · -14.60 –
1990 6–5 #83 of 107 · -11.29 –
1989 6–5 #65 of 106 · -3.72 –
1988 9–3 #60 of 104 · -3.42 –
1987 5–6 #76 of 104 · -9.03 –
1986 6–5 #66 of 105 · -5.97 –
1985 9–3 #41 of 106 · 3.47 –
1984 8–4 #69 of 106 · -2.94 –
1983 2–9 #101 of 105 · -20.03 –
1982 4–7 #96 of 105 · -15.69 –
1981 3–8 #116 of 136 · -9.94 –
1980 3–8 #110 of 138 · -9.95 –
1979 2–9 #123 of 138 · -15.85 –
1978 4–7 #112 of 138 · -9.93 –