The MRI
2026 · Week 2

Oregon

Big Ten · 1–1 · MRI Classic #76

Power+20.1#12 of 138
Résumé+0.02#67 · wins above average
Movement-7down from #5 last week
Best winBoise State (34–27)
Worst lossOklahoma State (31–39)
Schedule faced+0.3 avg opponent
Schedule ahead+6.9 avg opponent

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the number that moves a rating, rather than the win or loss alone.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerf
1 vs Boise State W 34–27 +13.4 -6.4
2 at Oklahoma State L 31–39 +26.2 -34.2

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
3 vs Portland State FCS +59.0 100%
4 at USC -2.7 44%
6 vs UCLA +18.7 87%
7 vs Nebraska +14.0 80%
8 at Illinois +7.8 68%
9 vs Northwestern +22.5 91%
10 at Ohio State -16.8 15%
11 vs Michigan +11.8 76%

Season by season

Best finish: #2 in 2014. 23 rated seasons. Two ratings appear here and their numbers are not comparable; the rank is. Season links open that year's game log.

25ClassicMRI 2.0 1 100 2003: #58 of 117 (8-5)2004: #56 of 117 (5-6)2005: #18 of 119 (10-2)2006: #47 of 119 (7-6)2007: #8 of 120 (9-4)2008: #13 of 120 (10-3)2009: #8 of 120 (10-3)2010: #5 of 120 (12-1)2011: #7 of 120 (12-2)2012: #2 of 124 (12-1)2013: #3 of 126 (11-2)2014: #2 of 128 (13-2)2015: #34 of 128 (9-4)2016: #88 of 128 (4-8)2017: #38 of 130 (7-5)2018: #51 of 130 (9-4)2019: #7 of 130 (12-2)2020: #26 of 128 (4-3)2021: #35 of 130 (10-4)2022: #14 of 131 (10-3)2023: #4 of 133 (12-2)2024: #4 of 134 (13-1)2025: #4 of 136 (13-2) 2003 2025

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 100 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Each row below says what its rank was out of. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRankRec Rating 
2025 4 of 136 13–2 29.05 Power
2024 4 of 134 13–1 27.16 Power
2023 4 of 133 12–2 26.71 Power
2022 14 of 131 10–3 15.11 Power
2021 35 of 130 10–4 9.49 Power
2020 26 of 128 4–3 10.93 Power
2019 7 of 130 12–2 90.94 MRI
2018 51 of 130 9–4 32.41 MRI
2017 38 of 130 7–5 42.28 MRI
2016 88 of 128 4–8 0.50 MRI
2015 34 of 128 9–4 52.17 MRI
2014 2 of 128 13–2 123.51 MRI
2013 3 of 126 11–2 98.69 MRI
2012 2 of 124 12–1 111.26 MRI
2011 7 of 120 12–2 98.78 MRI
2010 5 of 120 12–1 110.99 MRI
2009 8 of 120 10–3 80.05 MRI
2008 13 of 120 10–3 75.05 MRI
2007 8 of 120 9–4 92.35 MRI
2006 47 of 119 7–6 38.03 MRI
2005 18 of 119 10–2 70.90 MRI
2004 56 of 117 5–6 30.93 MRI
2003 58 of 117 8–5 32.77 MRI