The MRI
2026 · Week 11

Toledo

MAC · 8–2 · 5–1 in conference · MRI Classic #23

Power-2.1#77 of 138
Résumé-0.20#99 · wins above average
Playoff chance<0.1%out of the picture
Trendrating by week

Who to root for this week

Nothing this weekend moves the needle.

Nothing this weekend moves the needle.

Best winWestern Michigan (45–38)
Worst lossBuffalo (8–23)
Schedule faced-16.3 avg opponent
Schedule ahead-13.0 avg opponent
Roster talent#110 of 127 · worth -6.8, rated -2.1: in line with it
Returning production66% of last year's · #30 of 128
Home field+2.6 pts · 98th of 131

How this rating is built

Power = w × (average margin counted + average opponent rating) + (1 − w) × preseason prior, where w = games ÷ (games + 4). After 10 games, w is 71%, so the preseason prior is 29% of this rating. Every game played shrinks that share.

PartValueWeightAdds
Margin counted+12.7 avg× 71%+9.1
Opponents faced-16.3 avg× 71%-11.7
Preseason prior+1.6× 29%+0.5
Power-2.1

This explains how the model reached the number. The opponent ratings come out of the same fitted model, so it is not independent proof that the rating is right.

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the result against expectation. Adds is a different question: how many points of Power the game contributes, counting its margin and the strength of the opponent together. A game can beat expectation and still add little, or the reverse. Adds, plus the preseason prior, sum to Power (figures are rounded so the column adds up). Hover an Adds figure for its arithmetic.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerfAdds
1 at Michigan State L 20–30 -7.0 -3.0 -0.6
2 vs Central Connecticut FCS W 63–10 +34.6 +18.4 -0.4
3 vs Temple W 49–48 +12.1 -11.1 -0.9
4 vs San Diego State W 41–16 +8.1 +16.9 +1.4
5 at Ball State W 39–24 +17.7 -2.7 +0.0
6 vs Buffalo L 8–23 +15.6 -30.6 -2.6
7 at Eastern Michigan W 34–14 +11.7 +8.3 +0.8
8 vs Western Michigan W 45–38 +1.5 +5.5 +0.4
10 at Sacramento State W 20–17 +18.3 -15.3 -1.2
11 vs UMass W 24–0 +19.6 +4.4 +0.5
Preseason prior (29% of the rating)+0.5
Power-2.1

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
12 vs Bowling Green +20.0 89%
13 at Ohio +1.6 54%

Coaches

Mean added leaves out 1978–1980, the first seasons rated, which have no preseason prior to measure against.

CoachYearsRecordMean added
Chuck Stobart1978–198122-22-1+5.8
Dan Simrell1982–198949-38-2-4.7
Nick Saban19909-2+3.8
Gary Pinkel1991–200073-37-3-0.6
Tom Amstutz2001–200858-41-3.4
Tim Beckman2009–201013-12-0.4
Matt Campbell2011–201535-15+2.4
Jason Candle2016–202580-44-0.2
Mike Jacobs20268-2-1.7

Season by season

Best finish: #16 in 2015. 48 seasons rated. The two columns' numbers are not comparable; the rank within each is. Season links open that year's game log.

25 1 150 2003 (MRI Classic): #52 of 117 (8-4)2004 (MRI Classic): #60 of 117 (9-4)2005 (MRI Classic): #22 of 119 (9-3)2006 (MRI Classic): #91 of 119 (5-7)2007 (MRI Classic): #92 of 120 (5-7)2008 (MRI Classic): #101 of 120 (3-9)2009 (MRI Classic): #100 of 120 (5-7)2010 (MRI Classic): #51 of 120 (8-5)2011 (MRI Classic): #22 of 120 (9-4)2012 (MRI Classic): #57 of 124 (9-4)2013 (MRI Classic): #62 of 126 (7-5)2014 (MRI Classic): #47 of 128 (9-4)2015 (MRI Classic): #16 of 128 (10-2)2016 (MRI Classic): #29 of 128 (9-4)2017 (MRI Classic): #34 of 130 (11-3)2018 (MRI Classic): #66 of 130 (7-6)2019 (MRI Classic): #111 of 130 (6-6)1978 (MRI 2.0): #124 of 138 (2-9)1979 (MRI 2.0): #81 of 138 (7-4)1980 (MRI 2.0): #95 of 138 (4-7)1981 (MRI 2.0): #59 of 136 (9-3)1982 (MRI 2.0): #79 of 105 (6-5)1983 (MRI 2.0): #66 of 105 (9-2)1984 (MRI 2.0): #77 of 106 (8-4)1985 (MRI 2.0): #89 of 106 (4-7)1986 (MRI 2.0): #81 of 105 (7-4)1987 (MRI 2.0): #93 of 104 (3-8)1988 (MRI 2.0): #91 of 104 (6-5)1989 (MRI 2.0): #90 of 106 (6-5)1990 (MRI 2.0): #75 of 107 (9-2)1991 (MRI 2.0): #78 of 107 (5-6)1992 (MRI 2.0): #64 of 107 (8-3)1993 (MRI 2.0): #89 of 106 (4-7)1994 (MRI 2.0): #89 of 107 (6-5)1995 (MRI 2.0): #60 of 108 (11-1)1996 (MRI 2.0): #88 of 111 (7-4)1997 (MRI 2.0): #66 of 112 (9-3)1998 (MRI 2.0): #69 of 112 (7-5)1999 (MRI 2.0): #79 of 114 (6-5)2000 (MRI 2.0): #31 of 116 (10-1)2001 (MRI 2.0): #55 of 117 (10-2)2002 (MRI 2.0): #53 of 117 (9-5)2003 (MRI 2.0): #59 of 117 (8-4)2004 (MRI 2.0): #63 of 117 (9-4)2005 (MRI 2.0): #48 of 119 (9-3)2006 (MRI 2.0): #86 of 119 (5-7)2007 (MRI 2.0): #103 of 119 (5-7)2008 (MRI 2.0): #109 of 120 (3-9)2009 (MRI 2.0): #107 of 120 (5-7)2010 (MRI 2.0): #84 of 120 (8-5)2011 (MRI 2.0): #46 of 120 (9-4)2012 (MRI 2.0): #66 of 124 (9-4)2013 (MRI 2.0): #65 of 125 (7-5)2014 (MRI 2.0): #70 of 128 (9-4)2015 (MRI 2.0): #41 of 128 (10-2)2016 (MRI 2.0): #42 of 128 (9-4)2017 (MRI 2.0): #46 of 130 (11-3)2018 (MRI 2.0): #63 of 130 (7-6)2019 (MRI 2.0): #104 of 130 (6-6)2020 (MRI 2.0): #81 of 128 (4-2)2021 (MRI 2.0): #76 of 130 (7-6)2022 (MRI 2.0): #77 of 131 (9-5)2023 (MRI 2.0): #66 of 133 (11-3)2024 (MRI 2.0): #87 of 134 (8-5)2025 (MRI 2.0): #48 of 136 (8-5) MRI 2.0Classic 1978 2025

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 150 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Two lines where both ratings cover a season - MRI 2.0 in red, Classic in grey. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRec MRI 2.0MRI Classic
2025 8–5 #48 of 136 · 4.76 –
2024 8–5 #87 of 134 · -4.14 –
2023 11–3 #66 of 133 · 0.13 –
2022 9–5 #77 of 131 · -2.75 –
2021 7–6 #76 of 130 · -0.27 –
2020 4–2 #81 of 128 · -3.55 –
2019 6–6 #104 of 130 · -10.36 #111 of 130 · -24.12
2018 7–6 #63 of 130 · 1.54 #66 of 130 · 22.97
2017 11–3 #46 of 130 · 5.27 #34 of 130 · 51.05
2016 9–4 #42 of 128 · 7.03 #29 of 128 · 53.33
2015 10–2 #41 of 128 · 7.72 #16 of 128 · 71.36
2014 9–4 #70 of 128 · -1.76 #47 of 128 · 35.33
2013 7–5 #65 of 125 · -1.05 #62 of 126 · 27.78
2012 9–4 #66 of 124 · -1.08 #57 of 124 · 29.96
2011 9–4 #46 of 120 · 4.36 #22 of 120 · 59.85
2010 8–5 #84 of 120 · -7.35 #51 of 120 · 27.70
2009 5–7 #107 of 120 · -15.31 #100 of 120 · -8.21
2008 3–9 #109 of 120 · -15.91 #101 of 120 · -19.93
2007 5–7 #103 of 119 · -14.46 #92 of 120 · -6.34
2006 5–7 #86 of 119 · -8.06 #91 of 119 · -2.02
2005 9–3 #48 of 119 · 3.64 #22 of 119 · 60.39
2004 9–4 #63 of 117 · -0.31 #60 of 117 · 26.54
2003 8–4 #59 of 117 · 0.87 #52 of 117 · 39.02
2002 9–5 #53 of 117 · 3.32 –
2001 10–2 #55 of 117 · 3.15 –
2000 10–1 #31 of 116 · 7.84 –
1999 6–5 #79 of 114 · -5.60 –
1998 7–5 #69 of 112 · -4.53 –
1997 9–3 #66 of 112 · -2.97 –
1996 7–4 #88 of 111 · -12.05 –
1995 11–1 #60 of 108 · -0.90 –
1994 6–5 #89 of 107 · -12.83 –
1993 4–7 #89 of 106 · -12.11 –
1992 8–3 #64 of 107 · -2.70 –
1991 5–6 #78 of 107 · -7.34 –
1990 9–2 #75 of 107 · -6.38 –
1989 6–5 #90 of 106 · -14.81 –
1988 6–5 #91 of 104 · -14.65 –
1987 3–8 #93 of 104 · -14.30 –
1986 7–4 #81 of 105 · -10.46 –
1985 4–7 #89 of 106 · -13.09 –
1984 8–4 #77 of 106 · -6.90 –
1983 9–2 #66 of 105 · -4.39 –
1982 6–5 #79 of 105 · -7.67 –
1981 9–3 #59 of 136 · 1.41 –
1980 4–7 #95 of 138 · -5.96 –
1979 7–4 #81 of 138 · -2.55 –
1978 2–9 #124 of 138 · -13.55 –